This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Read the latest issue online

GPs buried under trusts' workload dump

NHS 'should look to Babylon model to ease recruitment crisis'

The NHS could learn from the Babylon GP at Hand model to ease the recruitment crisis, according to the official evaluation into the online service provider.

The report, conducted by Ipsos Mori and published yesterday, said that there are ‘learnings for policy makers and the profession as a whole’ with regards to the digital-first model that attracts GPs to work for GP at Hand.

From the evidence, Ipsos Mori evaluated that the model could have ‘positive impact’ on the recruitment and retention of GPs who wouldn’t remain in general practice otherwise.

However, the report questioned that if the Babylon model was rolled out more widely, then the recruitment of GPs in so-called ‘traditional’ practices could become more difficult.

The report states: ‘Regardless of whether the BGPaH model is mainstreamed, there are learnings for policy makers and the profession as a whole about the features that are attracting GPs to work for BGPaHand that keep them satisfied with their work. It may be useful to consider if and how these features can be replicated more widely in conventional general practices.’

It continued: ‘The evidence collected suggests that the digital-first model provided by BGPaH could have a positive impact on the recruitment and retention of a group of GPs who may not remain in or enter into general practice otherwise.’

Yet there were concerns the model would have an effect on 'traditional general practice'.

It summarised: ‘Stakeholders questioned whether that could also make recruiting and retaining GPs in mainstream ‘traditional’ practices (or the workforce as a whole) more challenging, if this was rolled out more widely.’

While the evaluation acknowledged the current workforce crisis in the NHS, it showed findings of the Babylon model offering a 'more attractive' workplace for some GPs.

It said: 'The evidence collected for the evaluation shows that BGPaH, like other similar models of "digital-first" primary care, provides an attractive working environment for some GPs by giving them greater flexibility around how and where they deliver care. '

GPs interviewed for the report stated their ‘varied workload’ was a key factor in their job satisfaction. Furthermore, the work climate, autonomy and flexibility were all factors told to evaluators by GPs.

GP leaders have stated their concern about the digital-first model with regards to its recent application to become a single primary care network. 

Londonwide LMCs chief executive Dr Michelle Drage said the fact that almost one in four of patients de-register from the service 'shows how much the promises match the reality.'

She said: 'The fact that 28% of patients de-register from this service after joining shows how much the promises match the reality. The Independent Evaluation also notes that the GP at Hand model ‘presents a challenge for primary care networks if they are defined geographically’, we hope this point is taken onboard by those making decision on the future of PCNs in London.

'The fact that GP at Hand’s patients are healthier than the average population and fall into social categories defined as ‘city sophisticates’ and ‘career climbers’, once again raises questions about the priorities of this service, at a time when the health needs of London’s most deprived communities are rapidly growing. We will offer further comments once we have had time to consider the full report.'

Babylon's Medical Director of clinical services Dr Matthew Noble said: 'This independent report shows that GP at Hand is loved by all types of patients as they can now access a GP when they need to. I’m particularly pleased that the report has shown how our GPs enjoy their work, aren’t becoming burned out and how our digital-first approach may even be a way of encouraging GPs to stay in the profession and to help recruit more doctors into general practice.'

Earlier this week, Hammersmith and Fulham CCG said it could not confirm its approval of Babylon's network application due to the geographical circumstances of the digital-first model.

The report also found that global sum 'may not work well' for the GP at Hand model.

 

Readers' comments (8)

  • The report, conducted by Ipsos Mori ----- who funded this 'Survey' or Report??? Could we know please so we can get a glimpse of the characters trying to pull strings.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • National Hopeless Service

    Cant wait to spend my sessions reassuring the worried well that their self limiting illness is indeed trivia. Please phone me next week with more dross.

    Mind numbing, skill losing, boring medicine.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Yes, let’s move increasingly rare GPs away from frontline care of the unwell and instead get them to pander to the immediate access demands of the worried well and those with trivial illnesses. It’s not as if there is a workforce crisis.
    More idiocy, that is likely to sink the whole system.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Who will actually be looking after the complex and truly sick?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The model is workload control but the more GPs who have workload control then the less of us there are to have to pick up the extra work and the more the service dies.
    We need workload control for all ASAP which can only happen by defining a sustainable working day and turning away work that goes beyond this.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • @scottish GP
    At the rate GPs are retiring/laeving it may well be Matt Hancock. Better start dishing out the suicide pills.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • If GP at hand only see the worried well and self limiting illness why not just staff with PAs ?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Edoardo Cervoni

    I posted elsewhere my "concerns" about the Babylon project (https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/remote-consultations-all-glitters-gold-edoardo-cervoni/). I now read: "From the evidence, Ipsos Mori evaluated that the model could have ‘positive impact’ on the recruitment and retention of GPs who wouldn’t remain in general practice otherwise." The bottomline question remains unchanged: why is this the case?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say