This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Read the latest issue online

GPs buried under trusts' workload dump

No financial compensation for GPs affected by performers list delays

GPs who have been left unable to work for months due to delays in Capita’s performers list registration processes should not expect compensation for lost earnings, the Department of Health has said.

Citing NHS England guidance, health minister David Mowat said that it was ‘vital’ the process allowed time to check applicants had provided sufficient evidence.

He added that completing some applications properly can take ‘a number of months’ - though NHS England specifies GPs should allow 12 weeks to complete performers list registration.

It comes as Pulse revealed last month that GPs who have been waiting six months or more have approached the BMA to discuss claiming compensation for loss of earnings.

The delayed registration of qualified clinicians is the latest chapter in the disruption for GPs, dentists, opticians and pharmacists since Capita took on the contract for primary care support services in England.

In response to a written question regarding delays for dentists on joining the performers list – which NHS England confirmed to Pulse apply equally to GPs – Mr Mowat said: ‘NHS England’s standing guidance… does not include any expectation of, or provision for, compensation if an application takes more than 12 weeks.

‘The Performers List safeguards are important and are there for the protection of the public.

‘Therefore, it is vital that Primary Care Support England [Capita] and NHS England ensure each application provides the right evidence to enable it to be considered. For some applications it can take a number of months to properly complete these checks.’

The GPC has been calling for compensation for the disruption Capita have caused since May the the Government has told Capita to ‘consider’ it.

But Mr Mowat's response does add that NHS England is ‘evaluating all consequences’ of the current delays in performers list applications.

Last year NHS England said that the major support services provided by Capita would be ‘returned to acceptable levels’ by April 2017.

NHS England and Capita both declined to comment.

Support services disruption

Practices have been contending with significant disruption to payments, pensions, supplies and patient notes since Capita began overhauling services in March last year.

At the end of last year, the GPC warned that the service was still a ‘chaotic mess’ but practices have yet to be compensated for the disruption and additional workload they have suffered.

In January, NHS England pledged that ‘significant improvements’ to general practice support services will be completed by April, as it seeks to return the services it outsourced last year to ‘acceptable’ levels.

But by then practices will have endured more than year of disruption, after Capita took over as NHS England’s national provider of primary care support in September 2015.

The move followed an NHS England cost-cutting drive where it slashed its £100m-a-year support services budget by 40% and has resulted in huge backlogs of patient records movement, delays registering new GPs and missed payments

Readers' comments (17)

  • What is the legal position here? Wouldn't this be an ideal case for a class action? Performers lists seem to serve little purpose apart from siphoning off some money IMHO.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • ALL THIS "NHS ENGLAND GUIDANCE" STUFF IS COMPLETE RUBBISH AND HAS NO LEGAL BASIS WHATSOEVER.

    ANYBODY CAN CLAIM OR MAKE UP ANY "GUIDANCE" THEY LIKE.....MY "GUIDANCE" IS THAT IF NHS ENGLAND DON'T PAY ME FOR THE WORK THAT I DO THEN THEY CAN FULLY EXPECT A COURT CASE AS I AM OBLIGED TO ADHERE TO THIS "GUIDANCE".

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Sue and BMA should cover legal costs

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The BMA should do the decent thing for its members and bring about a class action. This is a disgusting way to treat your workforce

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Has Capita got a process for passing GP pension payments to the NHS Pensions Agency?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I think it is a bit weird that this companies has got its tentacles everywhere ?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Sorry folks, Capita has inherited a corrupt and inefficient system and I still believe that NHSE is behind the Performers list as there are live examples available at least in Southeast where a young drs conflict left him labelled as paranoid and refd to GMC but after being cleared of a MH diagnosis and by GMC, NHSE refused to accept his being put back on the list. So why is Capita to blame. It's just a facade behind which NHSE continues it's devious deeds. As is when your payments are incorrect, they blame it on NHS Digital now as that is is fashoin - a new facade. David Mowat is another quasi-medico supporting the establishment - they probably do pay him 200k annually to do so - please sympathize with him instead of throwing stones.He's got a family to feed.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page

Have your say