This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

pul jul aug2020 cover 80x101px
Read the latest issue online

Independents' Day

Over 150 overseas doctors join NHS from international recruitment scheme

A flagship recruitment programme has recruited more than 150 overseas doctors to the NHS, the Government has said. 

The International GP Recruitment (IGPR) Programme, set up in April 2016, initially aimed to recruit 500 foreign doctors by 2020. But a year later, NHS England increased its goal, aiming to recruit between 2,000 and 3,000 GPs.

Primary care minister Jo Churchill last week revealed that the scheme has now attracted more than 150 doctors through the 'extended national programme and the pilots'.

However, GP leaders have expressed disappointment over the slow uptake of the scheme, which is 'falling far short' of its targets. 

The updated figure comes despite the scheme bringing 12 GPs to Northamptonshire in just six months since its launch, while a total of 120 overseas doctors had been recruited this year - 70 of which are in the country in placements or seeing patients in practices. 

Labour MP Gareth Snell asked health and social care secretary Matt Hancock how many GPs were recruited to the NHS under the IGPR Programme in 2018 and 2019 and how much the scheme has cost the public. 

In response, Ms Churchill said: 'The IGPR Programme was announced in August 2017 and recruitment began from April 2018. Prior to this, four pilot schemes were established between May 2016 and November 2017.

'The IGPR programme has now recruited over 150 doctors from overseas through the extended national programme and the pilots. These are part of the pipeline of over 350 doctors who are currently working through the Induction and Refresher scheme aimed at supporting both international general practitioners joining general practice in England and domestically trained doctors wishing to return to practice.'

BMA GP Committee chair Dr Richard Vautrey said: 'Recruitment remains one of the biggest pressures facing general practice, and it’s clear that we need to look further than our own shores if we stand any chance of solving the workforce crisis.

'The IGPR Programme is falling far short of the targets set by NHS England, but it is important that we continue to look for ways to encourage overseas doctors to work in the NHS.

'At a time when GP workload is soaring and waiting times are longer than ever before, we need the process of joining and returning to general practice to be as simple as possible - not just for the benefit of our patients, but ultimately the entire NHS.'

RCGP chair Professor Helen Stokes-Lampard said: 'Any increase in the GP workforce is a good thing and should be celebrated – and we certainly welcome the doctors who have entered the profession via the international recruitment scheme, and are now on the frontline of the NHS delivering patient care. However, it is clear that demand for this scheme hasn’t been as high as expected.'

She added: 'Ultimately, we need the next iteration of the NHS people plan to include more detail of comprehensive initiatives to further boost GP recruitment – including an expansion of GP training places to 5,000 a year – and introduce meaningful initiatives to retain our existing workforce, so that we can deliver the care our patients need and deserve.'

In May, recruitment agencies approved by NHS Employers to recruit international GPs revealed that Brexit was the 'one thing slowing down international recruitment because of uncertainty.'

Earlier this year, Pulse learned that some CCGs had been forced to cut their 'overly ambitious' international recruitment targets.

Meanwhile, NHS England and the GMC have launched a joint app to help international GPs prepare for general practice in the UK

Are you looking for a new GP job? Search through 100s of vacancies on Pulse GP Jobs, our job site designed to help GPs find their next career move.

Readers' comments (17)

  • How much has it cost?
    If it's £150,000 then it's really delivered,
    If it's £1,500,000 then practices could have found an overseas doctor for themselves if they had been given the money directly.
    If it's anything more than that, then it's been a waste

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Cobblers

    So about 150 ish new GPs from the GP tap dripping into the bath that is the current workpool of GPs. Meantime the huge maw of the plughole is sucking thousands out through age, pensions, despair, self preservation or just getting the hell out of Dodge.

    Yes I can see that is working. /joke

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • As above, Cobblers nails it.

    Finding a handful of new GPs is utterly pointless without fixing the reason for GPs leaving in droves -

    Year on year drop in real terms income
    Failure to stop and actively encouraging the complaints culture
    CQC and revalidation - pointless time saps
    Failure to address unfunded dumping of work from secondary care
    The whole Pensions and Crapita debacle

    to name a few that spring to mind

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • HOw about the radical approach of actually treating existing GPs better and working on retention?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Exactly as the others have said.

    I refer back to Blackadder goes forth and a plan (last episode I think) that was regrettably “bollocks!”

    Good to see history repeat itself

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • National Hopeless Service

    A NHS spokesperson said: "150 has got a 5 and a 0 in it, a bit like 5000"

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Poor bastards

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • They haven’t got a clue what they’ve let themselves in for

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Will they stay after their initial contract expires in out current s***hole of a country?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Why is the BMA supporting a scheme to import doctors rather than fixing the job? Just whose interests are they representing?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page

Have your say