This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

pul jul aug2020 cover 80x101px
Read the latest issue online

Independents' Day

Quarter of migrant patients are wrongly refused GP access, study claims

Around one quarter of migrant patients are being stopped from registering with a GP practice, a study from Doctors of the World UK has claimed.

The organisation attempted to register 700 migrant patients with a GP but found that 28% were refused, due to the patients lacking ID, proof of address or, in a small number of cases, because of their immigration status.

Doctors of the World UK has urged practices to ensure their registration processes do not block these vulnerable patients.

But the BMA has said CCGs also have an important role to play in commissioning specialised services to help these vulnerable patients, while local leaders said it was encouraging that three-quarters of patients were able to access GPs. 

The findings go against NHS England guidance issued in November 2015, which clarified that all asylum seekers, refugees, overseas visitors - whether lawfully in the UK or not – as well as students, people on work visas and those who are homeless, are ‘eligible to register with a GP practice’.

They come as Doctors of the World UK launched a new website called, in partnership with the University of Sheffield and funded by The Health Foundation, which aims to provide information for primary care staff working with migrant patients and particularly those in more vulnerable circumstances.

In total, 122 GP practices were approached with registration requests, with 76 practices always agreeing to register patients, and eight always refusing registration.

But researchers found that 38 practices were inconsistent when registering patients, sometimes agreeing to register patients and sometimes not.

Overall, there were 700 recorded attempts to register with a GP, and while 506 registrations (72%) were agreed,194 were refused (28%).

The most common reasons for refusal were no proof of ID (29%), no proof of address (29%), gatekeeping by receptionists (20%), and immigration status (6%).

A spokesperson for Doctors of the World UK told Pulse: ‘GP practices should make sure their registration policy doesn’t prevent patients from registering.

'There are good reasons why refugees, undocumented migrants and trafficking victims don’t have proof for address or ID and the NHS England Guidance is clear that this is not a reason to refuse to register a patient.’

BMA GP Committee chair Dr Richard Vautrey said: ‘All patients living in the UK are entitled to register with a GP.

'However CCGs also have an important role in commissioning the necessary specialised services that are often required to help meet the needs of this vulnerable group of people.’

Tower Hamlets LMC chair Dr Jackie Applebee said: ‘It is encouraging that nearly three quarters of patients were able to find a GP with the help of Doctors of the World, but worrying that over a quarter were refused.'

Earlier this year, Dr Applebee raised the alarm when immigration officers from the Home Office asked an East London GP practice to confirm a patient’s address due to an ‘immigration issue’, which the practice refused to do.

And, regarding practices refusing to register patients without a home address, she said: ‘I accept that it is preferable to have a contact details for ease of communication.

'However, failure to produce documents should not be a barrier and we should train our reception staff to be sensitive to the fact that if someone seems reluctant to provide paperwork that it might be because they are a vulnerable migrant and are fearful that this may alert the Home Office to their whereabouts.’

It comes as last week, an equality impact assessment carried out on behalf of NHS Hammersmith and Fulham CCG found that Babylon's GP at Hand app made it easier for ‘vulnerable migrants and homeless people’ to register for NHS general practice.

Readers' comments (5)

  • Someone come on and tell me they're happy for overstayers/asylum seekers with rejected applications to have full access to NHS services... and justify that position.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • spot on C Ho

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • So I can go and register as Mr Norman Jones and nobody should be asking me of any proof of address or ID?
    Wake up ! In the whole of Europe, people had ID cards of some sort. Why can't the Home office give some sort of temp documentation - I remember well that last year, they wanted us GPs to check whether someone is entitled to free care or not. Now this. Nuts !

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment


    People not normally resident in the UK are not entitled to full NHS services. Only primary care which includes GP and A&E. People here on a visa for over 6 months pay £200 a year for access to the NHS. Which isn’t too bad. I lived in the states for a year and paid 20 dollars a month for health insurance. Admittedly it was 1988. Of course our system and the most of the developed world is far cheaper to run then the US system.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Mark, do you police that guidance? I.e turn away overstayers trying to register, or offering to see them as private patients?

    Also your definition of 'cheaper', what does that include? state subsidisation via taxes/compulsion and cost to individual via health insurance/bills? or simply cost to the state? Even if our system is cheaper to run overall, I don't believe that people should be compelled by law to cover for others' medical costs. 90% of the rest of the world's healthcare allow for healthcosts to be part of an individual's adult responsibilities in life

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say