This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Read the latest issue online

Gold, incentives and meh

Babylon pledges £75m to develop AI for managing chronic conditions

Babylon has pledged £75m to develop artificial intelligence that will help GPs diagnose and manage chronic conditions, the private health provider has announced.

The funding will go towards building a workforce of over 1,000 scientists, engineers and clinicians to expand Babylon's digital offering into chronic disease management.

Babylon CEO Dr Ali Parsa said a shortage of healthcare providers has meant that ‘sometimes those who are most in need – such as people with chronic conditions like mental health or diabetes - do not receive the consistent care they deserve’.

He added that AI ‘has the potential to improve the capacity of our healthcare professionals to safely care for more patients’.

According to the latest workforce figures the NHS has lost nearly 5,000 GP partners in a decade and 523 full-time equivalent GPs in since March.

He told Pulse that the Babylon app's symptom checker 'will expand into chronic disease management so we can assess [patients] for chronic diseases and we can also in addition to that manage the chronic diseases'.

Dr Parsa said: 'What [those with chronic diseases] find is that when they see a doctor it's fine but all other times they're left alone. So we can monitor them.

'If you are suicidal and you are chronically depressed, if you spend three days at home and if you are looking through your phone more than usual, we know that you're more likely to attempt suicide.

'But the only time we know is when you have attempted it and ended up in A&E. But we could intervene. We could say - hey, I notice you're at home a little bit, can I help you?'

Head of primary care and public health at Imperial College London Professor Azeem Majeed told Pulse that AI ‘has a lot of potential in healthcare, including in primary care’ and with the shortage of doctors, ‘if some of their work can be taken on by AI-based tools, this would help relieve some of the pressures’.

However, he added: ‘AI would also need considerable evaluation before it could be rolled out into routine clinical practice.

‘This would include assessing its safety and effectiveness, and also its acceptability to patients and health professionals.’

Dr Chris Arden, a Southampton-based GP with special interest in cardiology, said: 'Given the nature of our interaction in primary care I think there still will be a lot of value obviously in the personal contact and that relationship with the patient and that's something that will never be replaced.'

 

Related images

  • blood pressure alamy 400x400

Readers' comments (18)

  • “if you spend three days at home and if you are looking through your phone more than usual, we know that you're more likely to attempt suicide.” So everyone will get a text asking them if they are feeling suicidal at the end of a bank holiday weekend!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Does pulse talk about anything else apart from Babylon? It’s propaganda, nothing more.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Before expanding into chronic disease management, how about improving the current offering...this doctor posts amusing chat bot diagnoses videos. Well, it would be amusing if it wasn’t being actively used by patients. Only a matter of time before a serious clinical incident. https://mobile.twitter.com/drmurphy11?lang=en

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • It is naive to think than when a serious clinical incident occurs, there will be any publicity at all.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • National Hopeless Service

    Isn't mankind wonderful. We can find £75million to develop something pointless but cant create £75million to support functional coalface General Practice. I am dreading getting old and ill.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • That's why Doctor McDoctor Face, it is time to leave the government out of as many decisions as possible, i.e. anti-socialism, and vote for the free market, and reduced government spending

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Artificial intelligence? Is that something that's pretending to be intelligent? :D

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • This is SCARY-this suicidal patient scenario described above suggests that the health secretary is supporting an organisation planning to produce monitoring apps that will be watching you and know where you are and what your phone is doing!! Big Brother is Watching you or what? ( and how could you decide if a mental health sufferer is displaying paranoid ideas or not when they really are being spied on through their mobile phone and getting voices commenting on their actions through it? )

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • @ Christopher Ho
    You are having a laugh, right?
    The problem is simply that this Government are Tories and have been trying to destroy the NHS since its inception. Its underfunding and capitalism that is causing its demise.
    You can stick your free market ideology where the sun don't shine if you want a fair healthcare system for all. But if you want all the poor in this country to die and you don't give a monkeys- then your way is good.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Angus - I am definitely not having a laugh. It has nothing to do with which government is in power. It has to do with socialised medicine and other policies destroying/bankrupting our country. You clearly haven't researched history or this subject properly. 90% of the rest of the world runs less socialised healthcare provision, and in the vast majority of places, the poor are NOT dying on the street or for lack of healthcare. You want to fund the NHS more? How much more? You want to throw more money at managers? It is currently at 1/3 of budget with our already heavy tax burden on the less than 50% of the working population that is paying for EVERYONE ELSE. Capitalism is what is funding EVERYTHING. Where do you think your taxes come from? I do want to help the 'poor', but socialised healthcare does the exact opposite. Neither should I be COMPELLED to help them through taxation, but that I should have a choice. Giving the public individual responsibility and treating them like adults is the real 'help'.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • And you use of 'fair' and 'all' is misleading. What you mean is equal, even if it is unfair. What's 'fair'? Say for example, an overstayer who has never paid a penny into the Treasury, being treated like a citizen and allowed access to say fertility treatment? That's patently unfair, but if you want 'equal' treatment for everyone in the country, that would be what you're promoting. What would make it fair, would be covering the basics for the 10-20% of the population that can't provide for themselves. Everyone else is then responsible for their own individual healthcare needs and hence, own PERSONAL HEALTH. A lower tax burden through reduced government spending, would then give breathing room and opportunity for altruism/charity, look at post-war USA for example.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Christopher Ho ,

    Are you seriously advocating an American Style Health System ?

    I cannot think of any model that is worse.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Faithful, no, their system is changing anyways. Look further afield, look global... I like Singapore's system, but obviously the society, demographics, politics, are different. Also, how would you define 'worse'? You would have to agree as a population what your targeted parameters are before you decide your ideal system. The population might be happy to be taxed to death to cover 'from cradle to grave' regardless of the wastage, the misuse, the unfairness, the politicking, the incentive to medicalise, to the illness behaviour, the nannying, etc. I simply propose, that for the good of the whole(country and citizens), history has shown so far, what has worked most efficiently, and that is minimal state intervention and spending, small tax burden, giving the individual the freedom and liberty to do good, rather than compelling them via use of force, which makes them less likely to do so.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • If the government didn’t waste so much of the money on IT and reorganisations and Quangos and Revalidation etc etc then there would be money enough to go around. At least for the next 50 years.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The uk’s future is very bright

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Christopher Ho unfortunately your intelligent Milton Friedman economics won’t catch on in the uk. Too much socialism and stupid decision makers for anything half as intelligent as a true Friedman economic model to take hold. The consequences are plain to see. Pointless even fighting the system. Will never change. A state of entropy has ensued.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • AlanAlmond

    Another amazing article discussing push Dr/Babylon. Can’t get enough of these guys, I’m sure everyone else agrees. Precious little else going down in medicine thase days. It’s really big news. Wow ...keep it coming PULSE, we are all hot for any info on push Dr. Yes we are.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Harry, I haven't given up hope yet. It all starts with education, it needs to be criticised for the poor standard public education that is being pumped out and privatised to allow free market forces to drive up quality again. And if we influence enough, the ballot box will show the way.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say