This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

pulse june2020 80x101px
Read the latest issue online

GPs go forth

GP practices could 'go under' if inundated with e-consultations, BMA warns

The BMA has warned that GP practices risk ‘going under’ if they take on email consultations without considering the practice’s capacity.

Speaking at a Conservative Party Conference fringe event, BMA GP Committee chair Dr Richard Vautrey said that some practices have taken on new technology ‘wholesale’, only to face deregistration after being unable to cope with the ensuing demand.

This comes after it was revealed that 39 CCGs purchased a tool for e-consultations last year under NHS England’s £45m fund.

The e-consultation tools, such as eConsult and Wiggly Amps’ Engage Consult tool, rely on symptom checkers and online forms, which patients submit to their GP electronically.

However, Dr Vautrey said: ‘There are some practices that have really gone down this route wholesale, invited email consultations and all sorts of activity and have gone under as a result of that because they’ve been absolutely snowed under.

‘They’ve opened the gates and all of a sudden, they cannot cope and it’s ended up being quite dangerous because they’ve got so behind in responses that patients have not been able to get timely answers.’

He added that general practice has ‘to be really careful that we’ve got the right capacity in place’ before undertaking these new initiatives.

Speaking to Pulse, Dr Vautrey said he did not have a figure on the number of affected practices but said: ‘I’ve heard of GPs responding to emails from their patients on a Sunday evening while they’re watching Downton Abbey because they got so behind.’ 

He added that these practices have ‘gone from high-performing practices to one that the CQC had to re-evaluate’.

RCGP chair Professor Helen Stokes-Lampard added that while 'there is an unmet [patient] need out there… the big fear is the supply-induced demand’.

She said: ‘When you provide new wizzy stuff, people who would look at their mole and go "shall I or shan’t I [see my GP]" definitely will if it’s very, very easy.

‘That’s a real challenge for us to grapple with because it doesn’t mean we shouldn’t do it but it does mean we need to recognise what it is.’

Earlier this year, GPs raised safety concerns after NHS England said e-consultations are resolving ‘40-60%’ of patient ailments without having to schedule a face-to-face GP appointment.

Meanwhile, a leading super practice in London revealed plans to only offer patients face-to-face appointments where necessary, with the remainder to be dealt with via its eConsult online system.

Readers' comments (6)

  • David Banner

    I’m astonished that any GPs have been daft enough to start doing e-consultations voluntarily. Do we really need to spell out the inevitable chaos that will follow? There are a hundred reasons why GPs are going under, but this shouldn’t be one of them, because anyone in their right mind wouldn’t touch it with barge pole.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Until a trial shows that e consultations reduce the work load it seems silly to start down this road
    In the world of today the patient/consumer wants an almost instant response
    You will be opening the flood gates and will not be able to close them
    General Practice is close to collapse in many areas and the Government refuses to recognise this as they are totally involved BREXIT.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Cobblers

    Is this part of nGMS/PMS contract? No?

    What's the payment? Nothing?

    Not really a decision is there?

    And as a slight aside home is for family not for work. Seriously aheeple, family is what we are here for, enjoy it and forget work.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Cobblers

    Sorry that should read sheeple.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Obs not checked, colour of lesions may not be accurate and consistency, mobility any mass, not palpable. Not providing best care is seen in the light of Gross Negligence Manslaughter=jail. No thanks.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Hard to see how this would reduce demand, already at unrealistic levels. More top down diktat to tell us how to manage our workload by people who don't know what it is we do? Shall we manage the elderly chronic complex sick? Or shall we spend all out time on the worried well in WiC/ Hubs with ~50% appointments unfilled?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say