This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Read the latest issue online

A faulty production line

MPs criticise GP data extraction rollout

MPs have criticised the rollout of the GP data extraction service, which supports payments to practices, saying it has ‘failed to deliver’.

The House of Commons Public Accounts Committee (PAC) said that the Department of Health should decide on whether the General Practice Extraction Service (GPES) should be ’improved or replaced’ by June this year.

GPES was due to be operational by 2010 but only began functioning in 2014. It currently only provides data to two organisations - NHS England and the Health and Social Care Information Centre - although it was planned to support eight.

In its report into the rollout, published today, the PAC said that the DH had ‘admitted’ GPES was was ’only delivering about half of what was specified and paid for’ and that the fixed-price contract used was ‘inappropriate’.

The report said: ’The DH failed to ensure that an effective governance structure was in place for the project and that basic lessons from past government IT failures were learned. Very common mistakes from past projects were repeated, such as failing to adopt the right contracting approach, failing to ensure continuity of key staff on the project, and failing to undertake proper testing before accepting the system.

’GPES started some five years later than planned; it is over-budget; and it still does not provide the full service required. Atos, supplier for a key part of the system, may have met the letter of its contractual obligations but took advantage of a weak client by taking the client’s money while knowing full well that the whole system had not been properly tested.’

The PAC report follows a previous review by the National Audit Office last summer which found the system that had been delivered was ‘fundamentally flawed’ and unlikely to have a long-term future.

A spokesperson for supplier Atos said: ’On the part of the system we built, we collaborated fully. Where issues were found, we fixed them quickly at our own cost.’

Readers' comments (6)

  • Another NHS IT clusterf***.Add this to the many previous cockups and of course theirs no one to take the blame!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Silly 6:24
    GPs are to blame ;)

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Anonymous | GP Partner04 Jan 2016 6:24pm

    Wow can't even tell the difference between "theirs" (sic) and "there's"... Good grief! When launching an assault on the NHS one would do well to take heed of the well known proverb involving stones and glass houses!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Do GP's even NEED to be paid...handcuff them to their chairs and their computers, and then watch them under perform 24/7 !

    That is the 'Ultimate Plan' isn't it DoH/ J.Hunt !

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The NHS digital strategy at best has been constructed by successive generations of political protagonists, who are either intellectually challenged or would like to see the system fail, at all costs in order to be able to put a private spin on the way in which things should be done.
    Why appoint a minister of health whose main claim to fame is to co-author a treatise on how to dismantle the NHS.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The solution is quite simple in actual fact, so simple that it has been chosen to be ignored by the powers that be, probably because of ulterior motive( ? Their wallets).
    If many supermarkets can share data the length and breadth of the country using their reward card schemes. Then surely the NHS can?
    They won't of course, however it is the answer.
    This will require the unification of all records for each patient.
    No opt out allowed, to seek a private or non NHS alternative if they do.
    All medical information to be shared with appropriate health professionals - with no exception.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say