This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

pul jul aug2020 cover 80x101px
Read the latest issue online

Independents' Day

Private companies set for access to patient data for just £1

Private companies and researchers will be able to access data from GP records for £1, under plans revealed by NHS England to radically reduce the cost and boost the availability of information about patients available outside the NHS.

The body’s chief data officer has revealed he wants to reduce the costs for companies to access NHS datasets, from around £20,000 to £30,000 currently, to just £1.

NHS England said the data would be used to identify where improvements and efficiencies could be made in the NHS and that only approved companies would have access to the data.

But the GPC has raised concerns that private companies would have access to NHS patient data ‘on the cheap’.

Earlier this year NHS England announced plans to create Care Episode Statistics, where identifiable data extracted from GP records through the General Practice Extraction Service would be sent to the Health and Social Care Information Centre (HSCIC) to be linked with information from secondary care sources, and will be de-identified, unless the patient has given consent for identifiable data to be shared.

After concerns from the BMA and campaign groups, health secretary Jeremy Hunt announced that patients would have any reasonable objection to having identifiable data sent to the HSCIC noted, and a flag put in their records so this was clear. They could also object to their data leaving the HSCIC.

Currently universities such as Oxford, Cambridge, King’s College London as well as private companies BUPE, Dr Foster, Corin Ltd and Civil Eyes research have gone through the application process to receive the data, which involves proving adherence to information governance laws, and have been granted permission to receive data.

NHS England launched a consultation last month asking for views on what information should be extracted from hospitals in future, to provide an opportunity ‘for all interested parties to have their say in shaping the future of NHS hospital data and datasets.’

Mr Geraint Lewis, chief data officer at NHS England, said: ‘We want to ensure that patients, clinicians and staff who plan health services have access to the best possible information to help them improve health outcomes for patients.

‘This is why NHS England is developing the service to make better use of health care information. As an early step in this programme, data from GP systems will be linked to Hospital Episode Statistics (HES), transforming it into the Care Episodes Service (CES).’

He added: ‘NHS England wishes to reduce the fees to 1 GBP in order to encourage a wider range of accredited organisations, including charitable organisations, to analyse the data. However, we are keeping the nominal fee in place in order to ensure that all such organisations are held accountable for how they use the data, by means of a legally enforceable contract.

‘Such requests will be approved on an individual basis and will still be subject to the highest standards of information governance and all applicable privacy legislation.’

Dr Paul Cundy, chair of the GPC’s ICT subcommittee said he had concerns over the plans. He said: ‘Bona fide research would seem to be OK, but I would have some concerns about private companies getting NHS patient’s data on the cheap.’

Dr Brian Fisher, NHS Alliance patient and public involvement lead and a GP in Lewisham echoed these concerns.

He said: ‘There needs to be a fair price for data that’s extremely valuable. When the data is extracted from GP records, its put together with other data sources in a way which means patients can be identified.

‘Private companies will be particularly adept at this and they will get a lot out of it. So there needs to be a fair price for this data.’

Pulse revealed earlier this week that GP practices must take ‘reasonable steps’ to inform patients that identifiable data will be extracted from their records from this autumn and used by the NHS and private companies, or face action under the Data Protection Act.


Readers' comments (27)

  • I do not want private company's to have access to my medical notes, Am I able to opt out of this scheme?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Eh? It took me a year to get my own medical records. How can private companies access it for just a quid? The NHS has gone bonkers.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • welll there's a surprise; one more step towards dismantling the nhs; for private companies and researchers please read big american health insurers; those with pre-existing conditions won't be able to afford the premiums and those who are healthy will be cherry -picked- RIP NHS...

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • They can have all my patients' notes for 10p - I'm off!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Perhaps by default we should assume that all patients will object unless they otherwise tell us so, in which case the (private) buggers won't be able to get their greedy little mits on any of the data!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I'm impressed by how well organized the government is, in terms of its attack on the healthcare system in our country. Didn't think they could be so well organized!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The danger here is that the private companies will sell the data on to other organisations and patients will start receiving unsolicited mails and annoying phone calls late in the evenings and during weekends from companies seeking to sell products and services to them. This is goodbye to privacy. Unless there is some undisclosed benefit to humanity or some altrustic motive that we do not know about, this is just the equivalent of giving free access to anyone who wants to get into your private life, name, phone number, home address, email address et all.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Slippery slope!!!!!!!!!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The hospital equilvalent database is SUS Secondary User Service database and HSCIC are already selling patient data from this database.

    The issue with SUS is unlike GPES there is no mechanism for patients to opt out. I know I have tried annd Sec 10 of the DPA has been agreed by the DH as being applicable to me. I have been told no hospital treatment unless I consent to my data being used and sold by SUS.

    Karen Thomson from NHS England in the NIGB 2012 Annual Report states that patients opt outs to SUS are not being honoured.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • You are all talking balls, the reason for access to data is to enable private companies to create application to better serve patients, bafoons the lot of you.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page50 results per page

Have your say