This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

pul jul aug2020 cover 80x101px
Read the latest issue online

Independents' Day

At least 456 patients died after inappropriate opioid prescribing by GP

At least 456 patients died after being prescribed opioids without justification at a Gosport hospital in a 'dangerous' and 'institutionalised regime' of precribing, a review has concluded.

An inquiry into the deaths, conducted by former Bishop of Liverpool James Jones, concluded that an additional 200 patients with missing medical records may have also died due to overprescribed opioids.

Dr Jane Barton, a GP who worked at the hospital, was responsible for prescribing the painkillers for over 12 years and is so far the only person to face disciplinary action from the GMC over the deaths, although she was found fit to continue to practise.

But the report suggests this 'outcome was at least in part due to the exclusive focus on one individual when there were significant systemic problem' at the hospital.

The inquiry found: 'In total, the panel found evidence of opioid usage without appropriate clinical indication in 456 patients – that is, in 40% of the records that contained sufficient information.

'Taking into account the missing records, there were probably at least another 200 patients similarly affected but whose clinical notes were not found.'

Dr Barton was employed for five sessions a week in the department of medicine for elderly people at Gosport War Memorial Hospital between 1988 and 2000, where 92 patient deaths were initially investigated on multiple occations. 

Bishop Jones said: 'The documents seen by the Panel show that for a 12 year period a clinical assistant, Dr Barton was responsible for the practice of prescribing which prevailed on the wards. Although the consultants were not involved directly in treating patients on the wards, the medical records show that they were aware of how drugs were prescribed and administered but did not intervene to stop the practice.

'Nurses had a responsibility to challenge prescribing where it was not in the interests of the patient. The records show that the nurses did not discharge that responsibility and continued to administer the drugs prescribed.

'The documents also demonstrate the suboptimal care and lack of diligence by nursing staff in executing their professional accountability for the care delivered.'

A 2003 report by Prof Richard Baker, who worked on the Harold Shipman case, found evidence of 'almost routine use of opiates', which 'almost certainly had shortened the lives of some patients' at the hospital.

The latest review, which was commissioned by the Department of Health in 2014, interviewed over 100 families and combed over 800 death certificates, concluded that there was a 'disregard for human life'.

Dr Barton has been the only doctor to face disciplinary action following the deaths of 12 patients under her care, when she was found guilty of 'multiple instances of serious professional misconduct' in 2010.

According to contemporaneous news reports from the BBC, the GMC added that she had prescribed 'potentially hazardous' levels of drugs to her patients.

However, she was not struck off the medical register and was instead allow to continue practising under certain restrictions, including not injecting opiates for three years. Dr Barton removed herself from the medical register the following year.

The deaths have been subject to several police investigations, including by the Crown Prosecution Service which concluded on three occasions 'that the prosecution test was not satisfied and that there was insufficient evidence to sanction a criminal prosecution of healthcare staff, in particular Dr Barton'.

The report also found that an 'awareness of the Shipman case', who was convicted in 2000, 'cast a shadow' over the investigations into these deaths and 'the outcome was at least in part due to the exclusive focus on one individual when there were significant systemic problems'.

It concluded: 'The secretary of state for health and social care and the relevant public authorities will want to consider the action that now needs to be taken to further investigate what happened at the hospital.'

Summary of the panel's findings

The report, which looked at the period between 1989 and 2000 at Gosport War Memorial Hospital, found that:

  • There was a disregard for human life and a culture of shortening the lives of a large number of patients.
  • There was an institutionalised regime of prescribing and administering 'dangerous doses' of a hazardous combination of medication not clinically indicated or justified, with patients and relatives powerless in their relationship with professional staff.
  • When the relatives complained about the safety of patients and the appropriateness of their care, they were consistently let down by those in authority – both individuals and institutions.
  • The senior management of the hospital, healthcare organisations, Hampshire Constabulary, local politicians, the coronial system, the Crown Prosecution Service, the General Medical Council (GMC) and the Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC) all failed to act in ways that would have better protected patients and relatives, whose interests some subordinated to the reputation of the hospital and the professions involved.

Source: The Report of the Gosport Independent Panel

Readers' comments (31)

  • Has the bishop not studied the police and CPS reports and conclusions? What is this really about?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • A female shipman! We’re finished!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Whatever the rights and wrongs and guilt or innocence of parties involved in this, one thing you can be sure of is the conclusions of any inquiry will include-tighter regulations of doctors!....brace yourselves!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Appraisal spotted this one,I was wondering why the sudden push to get 'medical examiners'.Anyone want to be Quincy!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I listened to radio 4 this morning and everything a daughter said about her 65 year old father dying, seemed to point to him having had a massive stroke rendering him comatose and the opioids administered were to make him comfortable. It seems his inevitable death was attributed to the medication. Much of illness and medical treatment is a mystery to laymen and can easily be misconstrued.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Who knows what actually happened?

    Can I ask the GMC why they did not ask for this doctor to be erased as she was involved in the deaths of 456 patients? When they were apparently given opiates inappropriately to shorten their lives?

    Why did they prusue the erasure of a paediatrics registrar who was doing the job of three doctors and mistook hypovolaemic shock for sepsis - although had given antibiotics within a few hours when she realised?

    I would really like to know.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Took Early Retirement

    This is the "nth" enquiry into this. Someone wants to find someone else responsible. The police and DPP closed the file ages ago.
    I wonder if it is being judged by the standards of today rather than those of the 80s? I suspect it it.

    Who'd work in a hospice nowadays? Drugs will be in part responsible for almost all of the deaths. Leave people to die in pain and distress; it's much safer.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I have prescribed or given opioids to numerous patients. All those that have since died, did so after being given those opioids by me or according to my prescription.
    Some even benefitted from it. The Bishop ought to go and interview all those patients too, didn't he?
    There's also several to whom I have administered or prescribed opioids after their decease, but most of those are also now dead permanently (not counting reincarnation).
    What is to be gained by re-investigating this? just another cudgel for good GPs, made from the actions of a historical one, whom I must refrain from describing as good or bad, because not enough evidence is presented in the current news story.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • ....seemed to point to him having had a massive stroke rendering him comatose and the opioids administered were to make him comfortable.....

    I listened to this news article and totally agree, it sounded exactly like this patient had another stroke then died peacefully, but seemingly we are not allowed to say this anymore because under the totalitarian regime in which we practice, nobody is allowed to just 'die' any more there must be somebody to blame for it and preferably a doctor.

    Also did anyone hear that Bishop? The man referred to doctors being debarred!!
    This man is to possibly stand in judgement over doctors and he doesn't even know the correct jargon, or maybe he really does think he is dealing with barristers?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • This is really complex. So many questions raised. Why multiple investigations? Why now making headlines? What does this mean for all doctors who have used opioids to make dying people comfortable? I can see this leading to more harm than good.
    More undermining of the medical profession. What can people die of nowadays and at what age?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page50 results per page

Have your say