This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Read the latest issue online

GPs buried under trusts' workload dump

BMA: GPs 'likely' responsible for care of psychiatric inpatients in their area

GPs are 'likely' to have to provide primary care services for inpatients resident at psychiatric and other specialty institutions within their practice boundary, the BMA has said.

The new guidance - published after the BMA took legal advice on the issue - concerns patients residing in care homes, as well as single specialty and psychiatric institutions, following an increase in member enquiries about who is responsible for their primary care needs.

The guidance also says GPs should make decisions on home visits of these patients on a 'case-by-case basis'.

But other GP leaders argue that practices are neither skilled nor resourced for this type of work, with hospitals urged to take on more responsibility.

The new BMA guidance said that GPs are 'likely to be responsible' if:

  • the residents fall into the practice's geographical area, and;
  • the institution is registered as a care home by the CQC and is not registered as providing hospital services (in England).

It said practices were 'unlikely' to be responsible if:

  • the institution is registered with the CQC as a hospital (in England), and;
  • the institution provides a full range of medical services e.g. in an acute hospitals setting, rather than being a single specialty or psychiatric institution.

The BMA later clarified to Pulse that they think it is 'likely' that GPs will be responsible for patients in single specialty or psychiatric institutions. 

But hospital inpatients can also fall under a practice's remit if the institution does not provide 'adequate primary medical services', with the guidance saying that there are 'unlikely to be reasonable grounds for refusing to register such patients'.

The guidance said that while these characteristics indicate that GPs may be responsible, this is not 'an exhaustive list', and they should 'decline to work outside their normal clinical remit'.

When it comes to home visits, GPs should make clinical decisions on a case-by-case basis. For example, a request to visit a patient in a psychiatric institution 'will not be appropriate unless the medical condition of the patient requires it', the document said.

Former RCGP chair Professor Clare Gerada, a GP in south east London, said: 'These patients often have complex comorbidities well outside the skills or expertise of the average GP, including myself, and yet we are meant to manage three patients at a time when they are acutely unwell. Given the changes in health care its important that we get clarity on accountability and responsibility.

'Nursing homes on the whole are private, for profit organisations which don’t tend to build in any costs for out-of-hours or indeed in-hours medical care - some do, most don’t. They also don’t consult with local GPs ahead of opening to see if the local area has capacity to take on very unwell patients - and often in large numbers.'

She added: 'I think hospitals needs to take more responsibility for their population and this includes patients in care homes. I worry its always the GP having to pick up the extra work, with no prior discussion or resource'.

Presenting the guidance, the BMA said there was 'often confusion over who is clinically responsible for their care, which may present a risk to patient safety'.

It added: ‘GPs must not be forced to accept clinical responsibility for aspects of the care of patients in secondary care institutions, nor for those in any setting where the clinical needs of the patient fall outside the normal skills and contractual requirements of GPs.'

The BMA also warned GPs not to allow themselves to be 'coerced or contractually threatened' to provide services beyond their contractual obligations and said that if a GP is 'working outside their expertise and training they put patients at risk as well as their own registration'.

GPs should contact their LMC and medical defence body if they are being pressured into providing care in hospitals or are unclear about their responsibilities, they added.

It comes as NHS England announced last month that 240 new pharmacists would be recruited to carry out medicine reviews - alongside GPs - for 180,000 care home residents.

Care home residents and GP workload

The debate over workload associated with care home residents is not a new one. In fact, LMCs passed a motion in 2016 for GPs to stop looking after care home patients, because they had complex needs GPs could not meet.

However at the same time NHS England is piloting models which would see GP practices taking a greater responsibility for care home residents. Under the Enhanced Health in Care Homes vanguard scheme, practices are paired up with local care homes and GPs do weekly 'rounds'.

The BMA has argued that there are not enough GPs to roll that particular scheme out nationally.

Elsewhere, GPs in Wales are paid £270 per care home resident under a new enhanced service launched last year. And a CCG in Essex decided a few years ago to set up a dedicated GP service to care home residents to alleviate overworked local practices.

Readers' comments (18)

  • Oh boy. If your practice area includes one of these institutions you might as well close the doors and walk away. Your already slim chance of new recruitment has just gone to zero.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Una Coales. Retired NHS GP.

    The reform thinktank were suggesting giving more work to GPs, ie offloading from hospitals into the community as GPs were cheaper and there were more of them. I was aghast! I still remember a lovely but overworked S London GP partner and trainer who told me he felt he was not equipped to look after patients with acute schizophrenia but because the hospital were offloading into the community, he was now in charge and had to manage weekly like a hospital consultant psychiatrist. Next I heard he had a brain haemorrhage and died young in his 50s. I never learned about his funeral until too late so I was never able to show my respects. I was a maternity locum for that practice as well as ad hoc locums for years. Devastating.

    Please make your plan B asap. Yes, even in your 30s. Even if your practice closes, patients will find another and another until they are all turned into supersurgeries. Your patients will forget you as the NHS is the medical care bargain of the century! It is free! It was rare for me to see a working patient when I was seeing patients so I would venture to say that many who used the services may also be the ones who do not pay NI. And once you are retired, you stop paying NI yet enjoy free full cover medical care.

    Self preservation has got to be the motto now for you and for your family. When I retired from 17 years of service for the NHS, I quietly disappeared into the night. No medals or gold watches. You are simply a worker who has ceased to be of use.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I’ll be waiting for the local DGH to call me to do a home visit. Ridiculous story. It was April 1st last week.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • If you wish to object to a 'care home' opening, contact the licensing body, CQC or county council planning permission department, to find out why you were not consulted prior to licence being issued. You might even get it closed down!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Azeem Majeed

    The BMA has to interpret the GP contract the way it is written. The contract does though need a major re-write to bring it in line with modern medical practice. The other approach I think the BMA should take is to raise this issue with the CQC and for NHS providers with CCGs and NHS England (or equivalents in other countries). As part of their registration and contracting processes, these providers should show they can provide comprehensive care to their inpatients, otherwise how can they be providing safe and effective care?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • @Una Coales.
    Not surprised by Reform's comments. They are just another right wing w@@k tank similar to The Taxpayers Alliance, who are lent an air of credibility by their frequent quotes and appearances in the public broadcasting arena without any proper scrutiny.
    People are not aware of these organisation's political bias because they are not introduced as such.
    The only things such w@@ktanks are expert in is feathering their own nests.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Ask Babylon to sort them out.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • There are still a suprising number of Doctors funding the BMA Quislings; please stop, the BMA are not helping us.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page

Have your say