This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

pul jul aug2020 cover 80x101px
Read the latest issue online

Independents' Day

DH rejects ‘highly speculative’ estimate of general practice fraud

The Department of Health has said it does not recognise the ‘highly speculative’ figures in a report on NHS fraud, which claimed that GPs were likely to be responsible for £348m in falsely claimed costs.

The estimates from the ‘Financial cost of healthcare fraud 2015: What data from around the world shows’ report by PFK Littlejohn LLP accountants were widely reported in the national press – but the report itself describes the figures as ‘best estimates’.

Led by the former CEO of the NHS Counter Fraud Service, Jim Gee, who is now director of counter-fraud services at PKF Littlejohn, the report acknowledges that ‘there has never been a successful NHS loss measurement exercise looking at expenditure on general practice’.

It instead uses a ‘healthcare global average fraud loss rate’ of 4.57% to extrapolate the cost of fraud from the total NHS expenditure on general practice – £7.63bn.

And it runs this estimate alongside a single case study of a GP who falsified patient records to steal £62,00.

It states other types of fraud in general practice include ‘claiming for enhanced services that weren’t provided’, ’false prescriptions for self-medicating’ and even ‘accepting bribes to register overseas visitors’.

The report does not give any details to support the latter examples and a Department of Health spokesperson said: ‘We do not recognise the figures in this highly speculative report, which is full of inconsistencies. We are determined to stamp out fraud in the NHS through better information sharing to prevent and deter fraud, and we are working with NHS Protect on crime risks and trends to do even more in the future.’

Readers' comments (5)

  • Firm offering expensive counter fraud services in 'oooh isn't the NHS losing a lot in fraud' report. Cui bono?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Chap, bigging up his part, looking for a job!! Nothing to see here, move along!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • My favourite bit was the prescription charge fraud figures, the only source of which was something the author had once read in the Daily Mail and the government had not denied.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Dear All,
    Well done DH. If you apply the equivalent of the "healthcare global average fraud loss rate’ of 4.57% to" that they applied to GPs, i'd call it the "ex NHS Manager now working in industry wanting to exagerate his business opportunities" factor of 100% to these claims it looks like we're defrauding the NHS of 2.06 pence.
    Paul C

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • So, Gee says £5.7 billion going astray. Funnily enough he was the grand fromage of NHS counter fraud. Clearly wasn't much cop at his job if things are that bad. His figures are based on the time honoured consultancy formula; think of a number, double it and add £4 billion. I think "Gee" may be short for "Gee whizz, where did they find him??"

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say