This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Read the latest issue online

GPs buried under trusts' workload dump

Government delays state-backed GP indemnity update

The Government has been unable to update GPs on their long-awaited state-backed indemnity solution by the deadline it had set itself.

But, despite the failure to inform GPs in May as promised, a Department of Health and Social Care spokesperson told Pulse an update would come 'in the near future'.

The DHSC announced the scheme last year, after acknowledging that high costs of medical negligence cover were impacting GPs' ability to work.

Pulse understands policy leads within the department met yesterday to discuss the next steps, and that key stakeholders - including the BMA - will receive an update imminently on the scheme - which is due to come into effect by next April.

A DHSC spokesperson said: 'We are continuing to work closely with key stakeholders in the development of the scheme from April 2019. We will provide a further update in the near future.'

BMA GP Committee lead Dr Richard Vautrey said: 'There's nothing new to say on indemnity at the moment.'

What is happening to GP indemnity?

The state-backed indemnity scheme was welcome news to GPs when it was announced last October, following years of rising costs of negligence cover.

However the announcement left many unanswered questions and prompted a mixed response from medical indemnity organisations as well as caveats from the DHSC.

The DHSC has said the scheme will cover all practice staff, and most recently it told Pulse the scheme may potentially cover both future and historic claims.

GPs have been encouraged to participate in a survey to inform the negotiations.

This comes as, over the past years, GPs have been contending with indemnity cost hikes of up to 25% annually, according to reports.

Readers' comments (15)

  • David Banner

    And meanwhile we’re left another year in limbo wondering whether to stick with MPS at full whack, or cheaper MDU with worries over retrospective cover.
    The suspicion remains that Hunt kickied this into the long grass to avoid a mass exodus last year with a promise of jam tomorrow , and when the state backed scheme finally arrives it will be hopelessly inadequate.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • A surprise, really?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • So easy make indemnity 100% tax deductable sorted.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • AlanAlmond

    Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
    ........ ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
    urr......(clears throat) ......ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
    .....ha ha ha ha ha
    You’ve got to be joking? Indemnity delayed? You’re havin a laugh? This is not what I expect not at all.
    Hilarious !!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The carrot moves further away......

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I suspect they've looked under the bonnet of medical litigation against GPs and had a small heart attack. It was always going to be complex as there is no one GP job and the risks we face are escalating rapidly. What is really needed is reform of the arcane compensation system that assumes all future care delivered will be private. We should go the same way as New Zealand with a no blame system, it would be much better and safer for everyone in the long run if we abandon the culture of fear that now stalks UK doctors.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • ‘There is nothing to say’ says Richard Vautrey

    It would be helpful to even confirm that meetings are happening behind the scenes and that we are still on for an indemnity scheme from last year

    May tempt a few GPs to stay longer in the profession.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Is this the same team that are thrashing out the Brexit deal?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Vinci Ho

    Jon Snow, ''But when enough people make false promises , words stop meaning anything. Then there are no more answer but better and better lies. And lies won't help us in this fight.''
    Tyrion Lannister,''That is indeed a problem. The more immediate problem is that we're fu*ked''

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Tantalus

    Slippage, obfuscation and ultimately a big disappointment
    You heard it here first

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The only thing that surprises me about this is that so many GPs obviously believed that state backed GP indemnity was really going to happen.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Don’t believe anyone in the establishment,Government,GMC,BMA,RCGP,CQC etc etc etc.lie ,deceive ,duplicitous snakes all of them.Their is no honour among thieves.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Totally agree with Turn out the lights by their actions. I do think the BMA is trying but perhaps they are being too nice. We need a strong union.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Peter Swinyard

    As Chairman of the Family Doctor Association, I have regular contact with NHSE and continue to push the indemnity issue. I think some rather extreme views of the "establishment" are made above but can assure that Richard Vautrey is not just sitting back hoping for success but considerable pressure is being brought on NHSE to fulfil Mr Hunt's promises. They know they can't get away with this one as the promise of indemnity funding is the only thing keeping many GPs at their desks...

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I really really hope so Peter. I for one cannot continue paying these ridiculous fees just to go to work. And I'm sure I'm not the only one ready to jack it all in.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say