This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Read the latest issue online

CAMHS won't see you now

GP indemnity fees spiral out of control with 26% rise last year

Exclusive ‘Out-of-control’ GP indemnity costs have increased by more than a quarter in a year, show the results of a Pulse survey.

Indemnity fees rose by an average of 25.5% in the past 12 months leading up to November last year, according to an analysis of responses from more than 900 UK GPs.

But the increase could be even higher, as a large number of GPs said their fees had decreased because they had had to reduce the number of shifts they worked.

More than one in 10 respondents said their fees had more than doubled, and more than a quarter saw hikes in excess of 40% in the past year.

Medical defence organisations (MDOs) said that the figures were not representative, and they were seeing rises of around 10%. 

However, these figures currently represent the best estimate so far of the rising burden of legal indemnity, as medical defence bodies have refused to provide comparable figures to Pulse.

Dr Zishan Syed, a GP partner in West Kent said his indemnity costs have increased by 60% in the past 12 months and said the MDOs needed to do more to challenge individuals who engage in campaigns of vexatious complaints against clinicians.

He added: ’Furthermore, the fact that they pick and choose what case to defend can leave a GP who has paid year after year of fees in the lurch with no defence.’

Dr Graham Scott, a GP locum in Warrington, said his fees had more than doubled, adding: ’‘I think that it is out of control and unfair. It needs serious regulation.’

Dr Ishwar Bhatia, a GP locum in Ipswich and East Suffolk, said: ’Compared to sessions worked, the amount has increased to double. A regular four sessions in surgery cost £5,100, and out of hours is more.’

Several GPs commented it was ’not worth increasing hours of work’ as the cost of indemnity was so high and they felt helpless to question fee rises.

A GP who did not want to be named said: ’There are no clear understandable rules for charges and because I don’t know how they work it out, I don’t have evidence for whether the charges are correct or not. I can’t complain as it is compulsory and we can’t work without indemnity.’

However, another GP who also wanted to remain anonymous, who saw a 20% increase in fees in the past year, said: ’When you’ve been through a complaint you realise how worthwhile it is, the support you get.’

The Medical Defence Union disputed the survey findings, claiming that average member subscription increases were lower, at around 10% a year. A spokesperson said: ’Long term, GP claims inflation has been running at over 10% year on year. Inevitably, this affects the subscriptions we need to collect to ensure our members’ peace of mind. Average subscription increases for our members reflect these trends rather than the figures your survey found.’

MDDUS also said most of its increases were smaller than 25%. A spokesperson said: ’MDDUS were able to limit subscription increases for the vast majority of our GP members to well below 20% this year. The numbers seeing increases at the level you quote were small – far smaller than the number of our Scottish members whose subscriptions were held stable.’

NHS England recently said it would reimburse GPs who take on extra out-of-hours shifts over winter under a temporary £2m scheme. A Pulse survey last year revealed that a year earlier half of GPs were already turning down out-of-hours shifts because the cover is too expensive.

The last LMCs Conference voted in favour of a motion for all GP indemnity costs to be covered all year round and the Government has looked into capping legal costs for small value claims.

How much have your indemnity fees changed in the past 12 months?

Increased by 100%: 3%

Increased by 80%: 3%

Increased by 60%: 5%

Increased by 40%: 14%

Increased by 20%: 28%

Increased by 10%: 15%

Stayed the same: 8%

Decreased by 10%: 1%

Decreased by 20%: 1%

Decreased by 40%: 0.5%

Decreased by 60%: 0.5%

Decreased by 80%: 0%

Don’t know: 190 21%

Total number of respondents: 922

The survey was launched on 26 October 2015, collating responses using the SurveyMonkey tool. The 20 questions asked covered a wide range of GP topics, to avoid selection bias on one issue. The survey was advertised to readers via our website and email newsletter, with a prize draw for a Samsung HD TV as an incentive to complete the survey. A total of 922 GPs answered this question.

Readers' comments (41)

  • I've worked my arse off during these last few months for OOH and th government is paying. Out of th winter indemnity scheme it's just not viable to do much work

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Well the whole aim of hunt is to squeeze the doctors so much that the pips squeek. It would be interesting to see by current rises in fees etc... we have to pay, and rates of inflation for these 'extras' when the estimate date would be that we would be paying to go to work??? Cannot be long now....

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Has anyone else noticed a trend? Centrally managed FPS making cash flow erratic, expenses higher, profits down, spiraling MDO fees, seniority withering away, CQC costs to be paid for by increasing our fees, pension pot limits and probably tax relief to be cut for higher earners. No brake on workload. I reckon Mr Hunt wonders why so many of us are still here?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • 10 sessions= 15000
    1 session= 1500
    But if you reduced your sessions to 8, then you pay 14000
    A kid will tell you that if one session is 1500 then reducing two sessions will get it down to 12000.
    If your premium has been doubled from 8 to 15000 it is because you are 'high risk' - you confided that there was a complaint although nothing may have come out of it.
    Reducing 2 sessions make that risk still higher so now your premium per session works out to be 14000/8= 1750
    This is MPS maths because there is an illiterate Lord MP sitting in this stupid cartel

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I believe when Moses told pharoah to 'let my people go' be brought along some plagues to make a point. You should start planning them folks - if you want this tyrannt to relent.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Una Coales. Retired NHS GP.

    I suggest you step up your plan B exit strategy.

    NHS consultants and Associate Specialists both get annual increases in their pay as well as discretionary financial rewards and the hospitals cover their indemnity, ie crown indemnity so they get to keep their 6 figure pay. No employees NI or employers NI to pay out of your pocket. No staff redundancies to pay out of your pocket.

    Only thing is Hunt is introducing shift work and in house on calls and scrapping hospital discretionary financial rewards which means consultants will go private and associate specialists will resign and locum.

    We have already heard that nurses bursaries will be scrapped and many hospitals are understaffed.

    Now that you know all arms of the NHS workforce are being attacked simultaneously, speed up your exit plan pronto.

    I have just heard that Australia may be increasing its immigration as it will need more farmers and farmhands. This means a need for more doctors as even with their own doctors, there will not be enough.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Reduced from 8 to 5 sessions
    £5000 increase to £8500

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The options everyone over 50 retire.
    everyone below resign from partnerships and go salaried.
    traditional general practice has gone.
    55 and I am taking early retirement and SO relieved. Now feel so much better. The job is making us unwell and there is no occupational health service for us.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I agree with a previous comment, that if you use the NHS you should not be allowed to sue. I think you should be able to complain about poor practice and expect a proper enquiry. If a doctor or practice has more than a certain level of complaints they should then be investigated to find out why- understaffed, ill, overworked .I think DR'S should be able to sue the NHSE if they mess up the medical system so badly in this country that we can no longer practice safely and it turns out this is why there was poor performance.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Doctors are slaves to the public, NHS,GMC and to themselves.

    I do not feel proud to be a doctor.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page50 results per page

Have your say