This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

GP funding withdrawn as direct result of Government public health cuts, says local council

Public health commissioners were forced to cap funding of GP-run NHS Health Checks as a direct result of the Government’s mid-year cuts in funding, a local authority has said.

Hertfordshire County Council told Pulse it needed to make savings as a result of the cuts – and hoped GPs would come to an agreement with them over how to achieve this.  

The Government introduced a £200m cut in the public health budget in June as part of a raft of measures to ‘bring down public debt’ – although it insisted this was on projected underspends and would not affect frontline services.

As revealed by Pulse, public health commissioners in Hertfordshire recently wrote to GP practices to request the change to their contracts – meaning they will be paid only for the health checks they have already completed so far this year.

Local GP leaders have vowed to fight the contract change, warning that it will force practices to lay off staff and cut other GP-run services, but say they have been accused of putting GPs’ ‘personal interests’ ahead of the need to sustain other public health services such as those for drug and alcohol misuse.

The council admitted the contract change would mean fewer health checks would be delivered under the scheme this year than planned – but insisted it was not siphoning the funding off in order to keep running drug and alcohol misuse services.

Jim McManus, director of public health at Hertfordshire County Council, said: ‘This decision has come as a result of the Government announcement to bring in mid-year cuts to public health budgets. We have to find areas to make savings, and while we appreciate the situation is far from ideal, we are hoping GPs will work with us to accept the terms of a new agreement.’ 

Mr McManus said: ‘We are absolutely not requesting these changes so that we can divert the money to drug and alcohol misuse services, or any other services.’

He added that the council was ‘very grateful for all the work that has gone in to providing NHS Health Checks over the past two years’ and it remained ‘committed to working with GPs to deliver the five year programme, ensuring good quality services are delivered’.

The GPC previously told Pulse the funding problems in Hertfordshire showed the Government was ‘misleading’ people about the impact on frontline services.

When announcing the cuts, the Treasury said ‘difficult decisions need to be made’ to reduce the country’s deficit and that it was currently reviewing feedback on how to minimise the impact of the cuts.

A DH spokesperson said: ‘Difficult decisions need to be made right across Government to reduce the deficit and ensure the sustainability of our public services. That’s why we have been consulting on how best to deliver these savings in a way that minimises any impact on services.

‘We are now considering the responses.’

Readers' comments (9)

  • Took Early Retirement

    I would be VERY surprised if any practice has to lay anyone off. However, if the money is cut, I sincerely hope no one will continue to do the work. (Valueless though it largely was.)

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Vinci Ho

    You see.
    This is part of the big plan of making 'surplus' of the economy by 2020. Only then , we can have a 'good' NHS . In order to achieve that , we are all required to 'co-operate'. Great , isn't it?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Hmm......

    GP and Surgery income has been cut for the past 10 years. I don't see that the local authorities have jumped in and helped.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • This brings about a huge concerns with health and social care budget being pool together Greater Manchester style. I know several CCGS/SS are planning to follow suite under the banner of greater efficiency and support.

    It high lights risks of inefficient and continuously defunded social service (no offence to anyone working in SS) will be propped up by ring fenced health budget. I know we don't feel ring fenced but we've not had anywhere near as much cut as SS has faced.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The cuts will continue until the deficit is ended. There is no likelihood of an improvement in GDP. Where is our manufacturing base? This country has little means to increase GDP, a large proportion of which comes from our corrupt banks. That is why it was so important for HMG to bailout the current banks in order to bring in income tax from the gains in rigging the FX market, high-frequency trading, manipulating the Libor rate, laundering drug money.... So, much of our public services, including the NHS, has been funded on rogue trading!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment


    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • HMG does not want an increase in spending on NHS or directly by patients through private healthcare. That takes away financial resources from people that would be better used in buying new products that can stimulate the economy, create more jobs and bring in more tax revenue. So reluctantly the government realises that somehow health care has to be provided for the growing number of older people, but it wants this provided as cheaply as possible. A well functioning healthcare service does not bringing any extra GDP. From a financial point of view it would be better if people died the moment they are no longer able to generate income and in turn taxes. So the government wants healthcare workers to be paid as little as possible and to be as productive as possible. Healthcare workers slaves would be the most useful thing for the British economy!!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • "Healthcare worker slaves"

    Seems that we are well on the way....

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Surely as, according to Pulse, the "Government [is] wasting £140m a year on NHS Health Checks" which are a "waste of time and money" is this not a good thing in such austere times...?!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say