This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

BMA tells May that flexible pensions will lead to a pay cut for doctors

The BMA has called on the Government to immediately reform the pensions tax system to prevent more doctors from leaving the NHS.

In a letter sent to Prime Minister Theresa May, BMA chair Dr Chaand Nagpaul said the NHS 'is on the cusp of a major workforce crisis and patients will suffer unless there is significant reform to pension taxation'.

Health secretary Matt Hancock last week announced an upcoming review to make pensions 'more flexible' for GPs in a bid to address retention issues.

However, the BMA said that this solution will lead to more doctors, including GPs, retiring early.

Dr Nagpaul wrote: 'In full awareness that you are in your final days as Prime Minister, I write on behalf of the BMA with regard to our ongoing concern that the NHS is on the cusp of a major workforce crisis. We hope that as your tenure draws to a close you will put in place measures to secure the future stability of the medical workforce and prevent patient services being adversely affected.

'Current government policy is driving doctors out of the workforce. The BMA has been working tirelessly to alert HM Treasury and wider Government of the real possibility of losing large swathes of expertise from the NHS’s most experienced doctors at a time when the over-stretched service needs it most. Without the good will of doctors to cover waiting lists and gaps in rotas as well as extra sessions in GP surgeries, patients will suffer.'

Under the current NHS pension scheme, the highest earning GPs pay 14.5% in contributions, but an annual allowance worth £40,000 limits the amount of money that can go into the pot each year without facing significant tax penalties. 

The Government is proposing to implement the '50:50' section, which would see high earning GPs, consultants and other senior clinicians reduce their normal contributions towards their pension pot by half and receive half the amount of their pension in return. 

But the BMA, alongside GP leaders and accountants, warned the measure is in effect a 'pay cut' and will not suffice to adress existing issues around the tapered annual allowance. 

Dr Nagpaul said: 'We have previously stated in our response to the Secretary of State that the 50:50 proposal will categorically not solve the problem. This option will not only result in doctors receiving a lower pension, but also does not remove the perverse incentive for doctors to reduce the work they do for the NHS. This is particularly the case if there is no recycling of employers’ pension contributions back to the employees.

He added: 'Although we hope to meet the Secretary of State to discuss short-term mitigating options, the true solution lies in pension taxation reform. Members of the NHS pension scheme have no control over the amount they pay into their pension and tax relief is already limited via the lifetime allowance. The annual and tapered annual allowance are not only unnecessary but are significantly damaging the ability to maintain safe, sufficient patient care and must be scrapped urgently.'

Speaking before the Health and Social Care Committee last week, NHS Improvement chair Baroness Harding also said 'concrete changes' to the NHS Pension Scheme are needed to prevent more doctors from leaving the NHS.

She said: 'We need to have something that provides the disinsentive but is also fair to taxpayers and fair to other professions whose pensions have been capped.

'We also need to recognise that we need to get this done quickly. We need to run a consultation and have real concrete changes going into the next tax year otherwise we'll be sitting here in a year's time still losing fantastic people that have a huge financial disinsetives to work for us.'

Readers' comments (11)

  • THE GOVERNMENT WON'T LISTEN SO THE ANSWER IS THAT THEY ARE "PUNISHED" BY MARKET FORCES.
    THEY ARE STUPID, ARROGANT HYPOCRITES WHO BULLY OTHERS INTO SUBMISSION.
    THEY MUST BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE FOR THEIR ACTIONS.....HAS THEIR MIND BEEN PERMANENTLY "FOGGED" BY HISTORIC SUBSTANCE MISUSE??

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The government doesn't care. We have to take matters into our own hands. When will the BME realise this?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • It shows it is deliberate and they want you to have a pay cut. Work does not pay in this case. The exodus continues.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Why talk to someone who’s not listening?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Why give your hard earned money to the government for them to keep until you retire? You just be mad if you think you’ll ever get it back

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • It's simple this country wants you to work for less money.

    Leave the NHS people are now tired of fighting.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • the NHS is on the cusp of a major workforce crisis.

    If this is how the BMA see our situation be afraid when they acknowledge a crisis. There will literally be no Docs left by that stage.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Dr Nagpaul demeans himself by his debased appeal to Mrs May who has thoroughly demonstrated that she gave close to zero fu##ks when she was more firmly established as having some authority compared to the present. She is looking forward to running through fields of wheat to the chagrin of the farmer, and leaves Britain as a hamstrung nation with an episode of transient global amnesia lasting 3 years, a hole in our history which is effectively time which has been lost forever.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I wish Pulse would remember that non-GPs with no knowledge of our pensions system read these pages. When reporting about pensions it might be a good idea to be more detailed.
    In the above article “..highest earning GPs pay 14.5% in contributions, but an annual allowance worth £40,000 limits the amount of money that can go into the pot each year without facing significant tax penalties” could be interpreted as meaning that affected GPs earn over £276,000 per year!
    There is the (now) 20.6% employER’s contributions (which we pay ourselves) and, critically, the annual rise in value of the pension pot, irrespective of the contributions, all contributing to the £40,000.
    It is NOT just the ‘highest earning’ GPs who are falling foul of this dreadful pensions tax system.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Headline should read;
    "...flexible pensions are a paycut for doctors"

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page

Have your say