This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

pulse june2020 80x101px
Read the latest issue online

GPs go forth

Locums forced to slash fees by 8% due to pensions changes

Exclusive GP locums have cut their fees by an average of 8% since April, or halted their pension payments altogether, as a result of the Government’s changes to employer superannuation contributions.

Figures from Rlocums, a website that matches 1,300 locums to practices, show that locums are being forced to share the burden with practices of paying the extra employer contributions that the Government imposed on practices in April.

GP leaders have backed the figures, saying there has been anecdotal evidence that smaller practices in particular have been heavily hit by the reforms and have taken to paying locums less or stopping their use altogether.

A Pulse survey of 435 GPs reflects the analysis, showing that more than four out of ten GPs say they have made changes to the way they employ locums.

In April, the burden of paying locums’ 14% pension contributions was transferred from the now defunct PCTs to GP surgeries. Practices do receive an allocation of money with their global sum, which the DH says is equivalent overall to the money spent by PCTs on locum superannuation.

But this is distributed evenly across GP practices according to their size, which means that those who do not use locums regularly are actually better off, while those who do – which tend to be smaller practices who cannot cover absences internally - are worse off.

The BMA sent a letter to health secretary Jeremy Hunt in April warning that it had seen ‘dozens of cases’ in which locums were being forced to cut their fees, but the Rlocum figures are the first concrete indication that this is happening in practice.

Dr Steve Leung, the medical director for Rlocums and a GP in Leicester, said the changes are adversely affecting both locums and practices.

He said: ‘Locums are losing out because of the changes. Locums think it’s unfair and so do the practices. Practices are being reimbursed for using locums, but it’s not enough. We need to go back to a system like the one we had before where surgeries get money according to the number of locums they use.’

Locums who still pension their income typically reduced their hourly rates from £82.92 to £76.29 during May – the first month after the policy change – representing a fall of about 8%, said Dr Leung.

Around 45.6% of locums were pensioning their work in March, but the figures had fallen to 41.6% by the start of May - which relates to a reduction of almost 9%. This trend is likely to continue, said Dr Leung.

The Pulse survey found that 58.4% of GPs said the practices had absorbed the extra costs of pensions’ superannuation. A further 10% said they had negotiated a reduction in fees, while 7% said they were employing more retired GPs. One in four GPs said they had taken other action, which normally involved reducing the number of locums they use.

Dr Peter Swinyard, a GP in Swindon and chair of the Family Doctor Association, said the reforms were disproportionately affecting smaller practices because they often rely heavily on locums to cover absences, whereas larger practices can provide cover through their own substantive doctors, added Dr Swinyard. ‘Large practices that have no need for locums have had a windfall from the new payments system,’ said Dr Swinyard.

He added: ‘Some practices have told me that they have a certain budget, and they are sticking to it. It means now that they are using fewer locums or paying them less. I’ve have heard of both situations.’

Dr Sajid Mehmood, a GP in Luton, said that the changes had been affecting his small practice. He said: ‘To try to cover the extra costs of paying locums’ superannuation contribution we decided we would absorb half of the extra and ask locums to absorb the other half. It meant that locums charging £80 an hour would have their payment reduced to about £74 or £75.

‘We had to do this because we work in a small practice with only 1.5 full-time GPs and so we have to use locums when one of us wants a holiday or goes to a conference or a course. We’ve been struggling year-on-year financially, and we’ve been losing quite a lot. It’s been really hard.’

However, Dr Richard Fieldhouse, chief executive of the National Association of Sessional GPs, criticised GP partners who have tried to drive down locum rates as ‘small-minded’. He said: ‘The increase in costs for most practices has been tiny because it is spread throughout their overall costs.’

He added the data highlighted that it would be advantageous for ‘independent, vulnerable’ locums to join ‘chambers’ – collections of locums who work together to provide freelance GP services and have greater bargaining power as a result.

Dr Fieldhouse said: ‘Isolated, independent locums have become vulnerable following the changes. They tend to be female and are often from overseas, and they are not represented nationally.’

Survey results

Have you taken any action to mitigate the cost of providing employers 14% superannuation for the locums working at your practice?

No, we have absorbed any extra costs - 254 (58.4%)

Yes, we have negotiated a reduction in locum rates - 44 (10.1%)

Yes, we now employ retired GPs - 30 (6.9%)

Other action - 107 (24.6%)



Readers' comments (24)

  • As a locum GP i can say that i have stopped paying into the NHS pension scheme but kept my rates the same

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • When you charge far more than a partner can possibly earn ie £90 per hour and no paperwork, no visits, no extras, no responsibility, no management or meetings it still ain't bad. We have been financially crippled by being forced into regular locum use.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • As a locum I am paying the full 25% into my NHS pension scheme as the surgeries decline paying it despite it being a legal obligation. Long gone are the days when the locum does not do HV/paperwork/extra's/path lab results etc.... Working just like a partner but minus the sandwich eating meetings but I do attend whenever i can fit it in.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • And so are partners-we pay all our pension contributions....we are not employed....we just don't earn £90 per hour..

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • A typically sensionalist choice of verbs by Pulse!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • In the area where I work I know the "localities" are trying to set a maximum sessional rate for locums. The younger GPs seem to accept this without question worried about the next mortgage payment driving down locum earnings for all. £80/hour is not a lot given the work intensity, responsibility and need to cover considerable expenses. Locums are value for money for the NHS when you consider the charges of other professions eg. my dentist charges £37 to write a referral letter, a private physio charges about £55 for a 30min appointment, and locum nurse practitioners can earn £55/hour. Furthermore these other professions don't have to pay £7000+/year in defence fees.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Once again I feel that Pulse plays the " poor Partners card" yet again. I have worked just recently for 2 practices as a locum where the pay per Partner 8 sessions is 190K and 200Krespectively but this did not stop them driving down my pay to the lowest possible 65/hr and then I had to pay my own MPS 150/wk and pension. The problem with locums is we are not united.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The problem with joining chambers is that you have to pay a hefty management fee to the chambers, typically around 10% of income, so you would be no better off in terms of net usable income.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The comments on pay-are Daily Mail rubbish. Nobody earns 190-200K from NHS work-this is total crap. It is simply not possible unless you have a laser printer making £50 notes all day. This is alot of paranoid stuff out there about Partners. Our locum has been earning £2,500 per month MORE than us partners-we had no choice....illness cover so pay or fold the practice.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • and we offered him Partnership......but he refused as he said we did not earn enough....he would be taking a big pay is true....I promise you.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page50 results per page

Have your say