This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Read the latest issue online

CAMHS won't see you now

Some 600 GP premises improvement projects delayed, minister admits

Hundreds of GP premises upgrades are on hold because they depend on the conclusion to negotiations over new reimbursement terms and conditions, a minister has admitted.

Health minster Philip Dunne said that 'up to 627' projects earmarked for support from NHS England’s £1bn premises fund were unable to progress until new Premises Cost Directions, which set out costs practices will be reimbursed for, had been agreed.

This comes despite NHS England previously claiming GP premises upgrades would not be hampered by the delayed negotiations, which have now dragged on for more than two years.

It also comes as a Pulse investigation into the rollout of the ETTF earlier this year revealed that only £48 million had been spent on GP premises.

GP leaders said there were fundamental improvements needed to make GP premises fit for purpose and condemned the ‘impasse’ preventing long-awaited funding being released from NHS England’s Estates and Technology Transformation Fund (ETTF).

The Premises Cost Directions, which were last updated by the Department of Health in April 2013, set out what practice business and building-related costs can be reimbursed by NHS England and under what circumstances.

Responding to a written question from Labour MP and shadow cabinet minister Richard Burden, Mr Dunne said that the cost directions are 'currently being negotiated' betwen the DH, NHS England and the BMA's GP Committee, adding that an end could finally be in sight.

He said: 'It is anticipated that the new directions will be agreed shortly.'

But, responding to Mr Burden's question about what impact the delay was having on the ETTF, Mr Dunne said that although 'no fully approved schemes' were being held up, a 'large number' of projects were in fact affected by the delay in finalising the premises cost direction changes.

He said: '[T]here are a large number of improvements to existing premises and new builds which are dependent on the revisions we have been negotiating (up to 627 schemes).'

The news comes as last year's GP Forward View pledged that planned changes to the Premises Cost Directions, including lifting the 66% contribution cap on premises developments, would allow it to fund GP bids through the ETTF at 100%.

NHS England, which lists around 600 ETTF projects as provisonally approved on its website, declined to comment on Mr Dunne's statement despite last year pledging that 'no project will be disadvantaged by the delay in the changes to the Premises Costs Directions'.

GPC chair Dr Richard Vautrey said: ‘Having good quality practice premises is fundamental to the successful delivery of general practice and its a scandal that so many practices are still struggling to cope in inadequate building that would be better suited the 19th century, let alone the the 21st.

'Despite promises made about significant funding to support vital premises development very few practices have actually seen anything delivered and those involved in the process have been caught up in a bureaucratic quagmire.

'It's imperative that urgent steps are taken to resolve this impasse and deliver essential funding to practices.'


Readers' comments (4)

  • One million of ''stocked'A rticle 106 moneys was 'discovered' by MP for Medway saved over 7 years and not given to Practices. The CCG then informed GPs they have 630 million at their disposal -Was this the same money?-If yes, then where's 370 million gone?
    This was a few months ago. No news if any Practice in Medway has been given a penny of this although 3 months have now passed since information was disclosed.
    Serious lack of transparency,that's what comes to mind. Welcome to Kent and Medway.
    Purge this region as this is an epitome of all ills prevailing in NHS.
    The job of cleansing will be half done.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • NHSEngland have informed us that even if the new Directions allow 100% funding they will ignore this and support two or more lesser bids at 66% - so this is all a waste of effort

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • OOOPS error: pls read: 630 thousand and 370 thousand in 11:03 instead of 'million'

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • This comment has been moderated

  • With a bit of luck they will delay this for so long that the money will only be released the day after the last practice has folded... thus saving all that money which would otherwise have been wasted.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say