This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

pul jul aug2020 cover 80x101px
Read the latest issue online

Independents' Day

Local banks of GPs working 'flexibly' to be set up across England

GP practices will be able to make use of salaried GPs who work flexibly across local areas via new 'banks' of doctors, the Government has announced.

The NHS People Plan, published today, said that building on the ‘flexible working changes’ brought about by Covid-19 is ‘crucial’ for retaining staff across the NHS.

This will also include encouraging practices and PCNs to offer ‘more flexible roles’ to salaried GPs.

The People Plan said: ‘NHS England and NHS Improvement will work with professional bodies to apply the same principles for flexible working in primary care, which is already more flexible than other parts of the NHS. 

‘Building on pilots, it will encourage GP practices and primary care networks to offer more flexible roles to salaried GPs and support the establishment of banks of GPs working flexibly in local systems.’

It added that PCNs should ‘prioritise’ recruiting temporary staff from staff banks ‘before more expensive agency and locum options’.

The plan said: ‘When recruiting temporary staff, systems, trusts and primary care networks should prioritise the use of bank staff before more expensive agency and locum options and reducing the use of ‘off framework’ agency shifts during 2020/21. 

‘Through its Bank Programme, NHS England and NHS Improvement will work with employers and systems to improve existing staff banks’ performance on fill rates and staff experience, aiming by 31 March 2021 to increase the number of staff registered with banks.’

Flexible working should form part of ‘standard induction conversations’ for new starters and annual appraisals, the document added.

It said: ‘Requesting flexibility – whether in hours or location – should not require a justification, and as far as possible should be offered regardless of role, team, organisation and grade.’

NHS England added that it will develop online ‘guidance and training’ on flexible working by December 2020.

This will provide ‘the tools to develop and assess applications for flexible working, with a view to supporting flexibility as a default’, it said.

The plan also said that the pandemic has seen 'more than 500 GPs returning to work alongside 1,000 locums and other GPs to support the Coronavirus Clinical Assessment Service (CCAS)'.

And it said HEE is 'exploring the development of a return to practice scheme' for doctors in the remainder of 2020/21, which would create 'a route from temporary professional registration back to full registration'.

According to the Government, a recent survey of returners to health and social care revealed around half were interested in continuing after the pandemic.

Commenting on the launch of the plan, health secretary Matt Hancock said'Every single person working in the NHS has contributed to an unprecedented national effort to beat back this virus and save lives. They have protected us and in return this government will do everything in its power to protect and support them. 

'By making the NHS the best place to work we’ll recruit and retain more talent and deliver 50,000 more nurses, 6,000 more doctors in general practice and 26,000 staff primary care professionals.

'Our NHS people deserve to get on with caring for patients and this crisis has proved there’s bureaucracy that our healthcare system can do better without. So I’m urging people across the NHS and social care to speak up about what red tape you can do without to allow you to better deliver the high-quality care you are renowned for.'

BMA council chair Dr Chaand Nagpaul said he was encouraged to see the plan highlighting 'several areas for improvement that the BMA has been calling for', including 'a focus on wellbeing, research and education, equality and diversity and flexible working'.

But he called for clarity on the scale of plans to extend the workforce; more detail on how the Government intends to retain staff; and for the plan to factor in the wider demand being placed on the NHS due to the Covid-19 backlog.

He said: 'What is important now is delivering these plans in a timely manner so that these long-overdue aspirations become reality... Delivering this will require new resources; it is vital that the Government matches these ambitions with a transparent long-term costed funding plan that delivers these long-overdue changes.' 

Pulse voluntary donation scheme

Since the outbreak of this pandemic, Pulse has strived to support you, whether it be through our resources page, our ‘Clinical Crises’ series, holding policymakers to account with exclusives such as practices being supplied with faulty masks, or GPs being told to stop routine services in the hardest hit areas.

However, good journalism cannot be done on the cheap and, like the whole publishing industry, we have been affected by the economic slowdown. We also strongly believe the content we produce should remain free as we feel it is essential for you. Because of this, we have set up a voluntary donation scheme. There is no compulsion whatsoever to donate. But if you feel we are helping you, and you would like to support us, anything you can spare would be greatly appreciated. Read more here.

Donate here

Readers' comments (22)

  • Vinci Ho

    ‘’...So I’m urging people across the NHS and social care to speak up about what red tape you can do without to allow you to better deliver the high-quality care you are renowned for.' ‘’

    Eh, what about getting rid of NHS England/Improvement? Or even you considering to resign ?👿

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Dear Vinci,

    Unfortunately, going by past records, most of the GP docs aren’t very ballsy. Ideally, salaried GP doctors are supposed to determine how they work according to the contracts they sign with the practice. Sadly, most partners will be only too happy to push for the service.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Free market works just fine as it is. Yes we suffered with lack of work for a few months - but we have flexible commitment, and can set our own rates and terms. Death in service is a red herring - take out private cover and add this on your locum rates.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Dear All,
    I'm a partner. Do I want to deploy others under instruction from the mad Hatter? No thanks, i'll deploy according to my contract with them.
    More pie in the sky from the maddest of all hatters.
    Regards
    Paul C

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • another 'solution' in search of a problem

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • One suspects they are trying to control the workforce, but like all the roflcopters their workforce planning/management fad will fail miserably,5000 more GPs anyone!They fail to put the plug in the bath will just empty.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • 'roflcopters' predictive text!!!! their previous attempts

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • 'Our NHS people deserve to get on with caring for patients and this crisis has proved there’s bureaucracy that our healthcare system can do better without.
    So let us start on this process by providing a new service governed and "managed" by NHSE and NHSI.......two of the least competent over bureaucratised quangocracies you could find.
    Does he have any idea?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • There is a mechanism for negotiating hours, type of work, payment times, risk, organisation, working atmosphere, parking rights and location already - locum directly or via an agency for an agreed price.
    If you try to have one price with all the other variables above you will only end up with oversupply at some sites and staff refusing to work at others.
    Pension rules could be changed by nhse. The rest of it is down to the market.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Is it an NHS People Plan or an NHS People Ambition?
    Congrats NHSE on publishing a totally useless document with no real plan.
    No doubt some knighthoods in it for a few of you and please ty of work for McKinsey, Deloitte and the army of consultants.
    If you dont change the people or the narrative or approach the results are the same - bull....

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page50 results per page

Have your say