This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Read the latest issue online

CAMHS won't see you now

'New deal' threatens existence of general practice, BMA declares

Jeremy Hunt’s new deal puts at risk patient safety and threatens the very existence of general practice in the UK, the representative body of the BMA has unanimously declared.

At this week’s Annual Representatives Meeting in Liverpool, representatives of every medical profession voiced their disappointment in Friday’s pledge to force seven-day working on general practice in exchange for 5,000 more GPs and support for struggling practices.

In an urgent ‘rider’ to a motion on political interference in the NHS, representatives urged the Government to look instead at rescuing the current GP service, addressing years of underinvestment.

They called on ministers to focus on investing in existing GP out of hours, as seven-day working pilots found routine care at weekends was ‘unpopular with patients’.

The original motion said that policies should be ‘made in the light of best evidence’ and when ‘evidenced to be in the best interests of the patients’.

However, the rider – proposed by Dr Amy Small, a GP in Lothian, Scotland – stated: ‘That this meeting is disappointed to note that the secretary of state’s announcement of a new deal for general practice fails these tests, putting at risk patient safety, continuity of care and the very existence of general practice.

‘This meeting insists that government first focus on rescuing the current service to allow safe and sustainable care for patients.’

Dr Small, who has written for Pulse explaining how she went part time after the pressures of general practice left her feeling burnt out and ‘drowning’ told the ARM she was ‘furious’ with the health secretary’s speech.

She said: ‘Mr Hunt’s promise of 5,000 more GPs to follow is hollow. It’ll take a decade to train them, and in the meantime he wants us to work 40% more hours?

‘The vast majority of our patients don’t even want to see a GP routinely on a Sunday. I worked in a surgery that was open seven days a week, and I sat around twiddling my thumbs as people had better things to do that day.’

Seconding the rider motion, fellow GP Dr Farah Jameel said her message to the Government was ‘simple’, saying: ‘Unless what you really want is a service made up of exhausted, burnt-out, hamster-wheel doctors running a piecemeal, haphazard sort of service, putting patients at risk.’

‘[Representatives], it is imperative we stand together as “one profession” and send out a unified statement: “We want a better deal for general practice and patients, focused on fully resourcing a quality 24/7 urgent GP service and improved daytime routine access that can provide for safe patient care day and night”.

‘Our house is falling down, and secretary of state for health, what you are proposing is building an extension to that house.’

BMA chair Dr Mark Porter launched the ARM with his own conference speech decrying the new deal and its focus on seven-day working at the expense of investment in core services and out of hours.

And an open letter from GPs calling on the profession and public to reject seven-day access without investment has accrued more than 2,000 signatures, as part of a growing ‘no deal’ backlash.

Motion in full

Motion by THE AGENDA COMMITTEE (MOTION TO BE PROPOSED BY THE NORTH EAST REGIONAL COUNCIL): That this meeting believes that politicians irresponsibly fuel unrealistic public expectations of healthcare services for their own political ends, and:-

i) deplores politicians’ persistent and zealous pursuit of political dogma and ideology at the expense of patient care and without due regard to the view of clinicians, patients and the public;

ii) welcomes the BMA council #NoMoreGames campaign asking all political parties to stop playing games with the NHS;

iii) urges the governments to ensure their health commitments are made in the light of best evidence;

iv) urges the governments to ensure any changes to healthcare and delivery are only made when this is evidenced to be in the best interest of patients.

RIDER

That this meeting is disappointed to note that the Secretary of State’s announcement of a new deal for general practice fails these tests, putting at risk patient safety, continuity of care and the very existence of general practice. This meeting insists that government first focus on rescuing the current service to allow safe and sustainable care for patients.

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

Related images

  • Dr Farah Jameel

Readers' comments (36)

  • BMA again with pep talk...only smoke without a fire.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Thank you Mr Hunt for making it very clear for newly qualified GPs that the best way forward is to emigrate. Thank you RCGP for making MRCGP mandatory to become a GP, because without this qualification it is very difficult to emigrate to good countries.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The BMA has just the same attitude as mr Hunt - all talk no action.

    Some positive action with strong PR marketing ( use professionals here) is called for.

    WALK THE TALK.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Vinci Ho

    Found this on Wikipedia:
    In game theory, a non-cooperative game is one in which players make decisions independently. Thus, while players could cooperate, any cooperation must be self-enforcing.

    A game in which players can enforce contracts through third parties is a cooperative game.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Anonymous | Practice Manager | 22 June 2015 12:21pm

    Another ingredient to divide the profession. Each to their own. Swamp secondary care...they are protected to the ends of the earth.

    that would actually work

    start complaining about opd waiting times

    system collapse is the only language they understand

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The end of General Practice is near.
    Good bye GPs.
    Welcome Physician assistants.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Not assistants, associates!
    Note the change in language. It was not a mistake!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • where are the extra 5000 gp coming from and where is the resource to pay these Drs
    Until Mr Hunt can give these answers there should be no discussion whatsoever about 7 day access and if the government tries to impose this is when a ballot on resignation should take place

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Run it down until bust and patients who can afford it are forced to go private. In the meantime blame GPs (and soon perhaps consultants will be next?) as a smoke screen. This appears to be present government policy.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • It's so over.
    That's the clear message.
    Nearly 51, just out of the pension scheme, reached £1.3m, will enjoy the extra income until we presumably just run our practice into the ground.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • This comment has been moderated.

View results 10 results per page20 results per page50 results per page

Have your say