This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Read the latest issue online

GPs buried under trusts' workload dump

DH accused of 'complacency' over rising GP pressures by MPs

NHS England and the Department of Health have been ‘complacent’ about supporting general practice to manage increasingly complex health issues and demanding patients, an influential parliamentary committee has found.

The influential House of Commons Public Accounts Committee’s ’Access to General Practice in England report, released today, says that the Government have ’failed to ensure staffing in general practice has kept pace with growing demand’. 

It comes as the Government is facing pressure from the BMA and the profession over its seven-day access plans, and its attempts to introduce 5,000 new GPs to the system by 2020.

It also highlights how a lack of workforce data undermined workforce development with NHS officials unable to make well-informed decisions about where to spend limited resources.

The committee calls on NHS England to explain how it will retain experienced GPs and attract those who have left early to return to general practice.

The GPC has said that the report vindicates ‘repeated warnings’  that workload had reached unsustainable levels without adequate investment in the general practice workforce to deliver it.

The report, which follows a wide-ranging inquiry into general practice, emphasises:

  • the need to clearly set out how the NHS will to more to recruit and retain GPs and to bring back those who may have left for a career breaks or due to unsustainable pressures.
  • the need to evidence the effectiveness of schemes to recruit to under doctored areas, after Pulse revealed more than 100 GP trainees were in line for £20k golden hellos for training in these areas.
  • the problems with a lack of data on workforce, which mean that the ’Department and NHS England cannot be making well-informed decisions on how to improve access to general practice or where to direct their limited resources.’

It concluded: ‘In recent years the Department of Health and NHS England have failed to ensure that staffing in general practice has kept pace with growing demand.

‘They appear to have been complacent about general practice’s ability to cope with the increase in demand caused by rising public expectations and the needs of an ageing population, many of whom have multiple health conditions.’

But it did acknowledge action taken to address the GP workforce crisis, including NHS England’s join ten-point plan for GP workforce, and health secretary Jeremy Hunt’s announcement last year of a ‘new deal’ for general practice - which was heavily criticised by the profession.

Meg Hillier MP, Chair of the PAC, said: ’For too long staffing levels have failed to keep pace with the growth in demand and too little has been done to close the gap.

’Experienced GPs are quitting while training places go unfilled… These are serious problems requiring serious solutions. Government accepts action is necessary but we must have confidence this action will result in the best possible outcome for taxpayers.’

GPC chair Dr Chaand Nagpaul said: ‘This important independent report vindicates the BMA’s repeated warnings about the depth of the crisis confronting general practice.’

He adds: ‘As the report indicates, this alarming reality is a direct result of successive governments failing to build a GP workforce that can provide high quality care to a changing population with different needs, and a health system where large swathes of care is being moved out of hospitals into the community without the necessary funding being made available to meet this need.

Dr Nagpaul added that the GPC was pushing for an urgent rescue package for general practice.

A Department of Health spokesperson said: ‘As this report acknowledges, we are taking wide-ranging action to improve GP access as part of our commitment to a safer, seven day a week NHS.’

Pensions changes leading to early retirement?

pensions, money - online

pensions, money - online

Source: shutterstock

The (PAC)’s review into the NHS workforce had heard from NHS England’s director of commissioning, who said that older GPs are looking at ’alternative options’ because of changes to the tax treatment of pensions pots.

Rosamond Roughton said that NHS England has commissioned a review into why older GPs are leaving the profession as part of evidence to the committee.

She said that the review is to be concluded imminently, and said that it would be made public.

Read more here

 

Readers' comments (28)

  • Absolutely marvellous. State the bleedin obvious and blame "The Department of Health" not Hunt or his predecessor. And that will have about as much effect as a slap in the face with a wet fish.I have 3 countdown timers on my phone..43 days to 55 y.o. 109 days to getting the keys of our new surgery that we have pushed for and sweated blood and tears for 10 years and 481 days to my retirement. Good old Osborne and "The Department of Health" guaranteed that I would retire then a) because working any longer is financially meaningless and b) I will be too knackered then

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Dear 3.42, I left medicine and am now a naturopath. However I.had a big interest in Naturopathy beforehand so I was very experienced in the methods used and so did not have to take any more exams. Also while there is an NHS and free medical treatment you will have to compete with this.
    Anyway good luck!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Dear 3.42.
    I resigned my GP partnership 2 months ago, also mid 40's and unable to leave UK due to family reasons. I work 4 days a week as a speciality doctor at the local hospital- crap pay but better hours and SOOO much better working conditions than GP and so much more support from the team. I also work tribunals and do occasional OOH. So although poorer it's worth every penny!!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Let's go the dentist way. all sorts of regulations and half hearted help.
    The only way we can be professional is to ditch the contract enmass.
    Whistleblowing divide and rule.that is their game.
    The biggest risk to patients are the cuts and reorganising and endless changes to keep bureacrats in their jobs.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • coach me baby!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • and thus the public accounts committee proves that it has absolutely no understanding of what is happening.

    If a person publishes a book explaining their desire to destroy something, and then sets about actively destroying it, are they complacent? NO! A deliberate policy of destruction is not complacency, it is not ignorance or mistakes or incompetence, it is a deliberate act.

    JH published a book setting out this plan that he is enacting, why are people ignoring it and still pretending that they only need to speak about errors, about complacency?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • One bear did one poo in the woods. End of report

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • No not complacency but catastrophic mismanagent and overwhelming and frankly criminal incompetence
    Wholly unacceptable and a national disgrace with a strong stench of widespread alleged selfish cronyism under a sinister undemocratic cabal whose piecemeal destruction of the NHS is tantamount to treason as defined as deliberate selfish acts that are against the consent of the people and the national interest
    Many of this cabal should be in court
    Do they really think the electorate will not eventually wake from their naive slumber ?
    They will you know and there will be retribution

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page50 results per page

Have your say