Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

GP funding reduced by 2.3% last year despite overall increase in DH spend

The Government’s spending on GP services appeared to decline by 2.3% last year compared with the previous year, according to figures released by the Department of Health.

According to DH annual accounts, published yesterday, total spend on GMS, PMS and non-GMS GP services was £7.55bn in 2013/14, compared with £7.73bn in 2012/13.

This comes despite the overall DH spend rising by 2.6%, including increased spending on bailing out hospital trusts and buying healthcare services from non-NHS providers, which topped £10bn for the first time.

It comes after NHS England board papers published in May revealed that it had made savings on primary care costs despite recording a huge overspend overall, but NHS England claimed it was not possible to directly compare its accounts to legacy PCT accounts.

A Pulse investigation has shown that over 100 practices are at risk of having to close down due to factors such as the withdrawal of MPIG and PMS reviews as well as growing problems with recruiting GPs. This week, Pulse launched a petition urgently calling for the DH to step in and stop GP practice closures.

GP leaders said that the DH figures showed a lack of regard for the increased workload faced by GPs amid dwindling resources.

Liverpool LMC chair Dr Rob Barnett said: ‘What this might be suggesting is that yet again the spending on GP services is going down while spending on secondary care services is going up, while actually the workload that GPs and their teams are having to deal with appears to be rising year on year.

‘So we are being expected to cope with more and more with less and less funding. That doesn’t sound quite right. If those figures are correct, then clearly the Department of Health doesn’t value what GPs are doing and isn’t taking our concerns about what is going on seriously.’

Dr Barnett added that the increased spend on non-NHS healthcare services ‘fits in with this idea of moving services into the private sector. It is all very interesting stuff and for those that were shroud-waving since the Health and Social Care Act 2012, it will just add a little bit more fuel to the fire.’

The RCGP and BMA are running parallel campaigns for the Government to increase spend on GP services. The RCGP’s ‘Put patients first: Back general practice’ campaign is calling for the overall spend of the NHS budget on GP services to rise from around 7-8% to 11% by 2017. Meanwhile, the BMA’s ‘Your GP Cares’ campaign aims to relieve unsustainable financial and workload pressures on GPs.

Despite the figures occurring in the department’s own accounts, the DH referred to NHS England to comment.

An NHS England spokesperson said: ‘Due to differences in the coding of spend, it is not possible to make direct comparisons between NHS England accounts and PCT accounts. However, in late autumn, a comprehensive document “Investment in General Practice Report” will be published by the Health and Social Care Information Centre, which will outline all general practice spend.’

Readers' comments (5)

  • So the Tories spend 25% more of taxpayers money to their mates in the private sector than on the whole of general practice why isn't this in the torygraph or the mail? Anyone who can't see the true agenda needs to open their eyes

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Vinci Ho

    While I have absolutely no disagreement to what Rob said, it is interesting that DoH had to be 'honest' in publishing these figures but deferred to NHSE to comment with some explanations coming from outer space . Bear in mind , money was still overspent but NHSE, HEE etc kept implying that there was no new money or funding for primary care.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • YES THAT IS LOGICAL. CUT FUNDING TO GPs TO HELP A CRISIS!!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Peter Swinyard

    There is No New Money. The Old Money not looking too good either...

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The DOH knows that we are a bunch of ninnies. It is a wonder they have not cut funding by 25 %, because though we whinge, whinge and cry, we will do nothing. We are a totally spineless bunch of quivering jelly.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

IMPORTANT: On Wednesday 7 December 2016, we implemented a new log in system, and if you have not updated your details you may experience difficulties logging in. Update your details here. Only GMC-registered doctors are able to comment on this site.