Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

GP patient care funding to drop by £200m, says RCGP

The amount of money allocated to GPs to care for patients is set to drop by almost £200m over the next three years, the RCGP has warned.

An analysis of figures by the RCGP showed that total investment in general practice in England fell by 1.2% in 2011/12, a decrease of £8.4bn. The RCGP predicts that if this trend continues, £196m will be lost from GP service funding by 2015/16, equivalent to the current funding for 1.2 million patients.

The college said this was a stark warning that GP practices are being ‘starved of the resources they need’.

The figures also reveal that only 9% of the NHS budget in England was spent on general practice in 2010/11

RCGP chair Professor Clare Gerada said: ‘General practice is the most effective and cost-effective way of providing patient care - a whole day’s care in general practice costs one tenth of a day in hospital. But funding and resources for our services is being stretched to the limits, with family doctors facing ballooning workloads, record hours being worked in surgery and real consequences for patient care.

‘Most GPs want to help alleviate pressure on hospitals, including on A&E, with a shift in care back to the community, but this must be matched with adequate resourcing and we cannot continue to juggle an ever-increasing workload with a decreasing workforce.’

A spokesperson for the Department of Health disputed the figures and said that the Government was ‘not planning to cut funding levels for primary care’.

‘Funding has actually increased by 1.3% this year,’ the spokesperson added.

Readers' comments (5)

  • 1.3% increase in funding, excellent, remind me what the inflation rate is!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Vinci Ho

    (1) there is no consideration of ageing population as well as baby boom , all requiring further investment in NHS
    (2) the tone of DoH is insulting ,' take the 1.3% or leave it , it could very easily be 0%' despicable !

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • 1.3% increase won't cover the additional costs of CQC - let alone increased expenses, CCG committments or any work transfered from secondary - and increasingly community - care.
    From the decision to cut the DDRB recommendations (which were not generous in the first place), it might seem that the DH has little or no idea of general practice: but when has DH *ever* had the slightest understanding of general practice?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • These type of things happen when brilliant people like Dr Gerada are at the helm of general practice.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Primary care did well then. The acute sector got a negative inflation uplift of nearly -2%

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say