Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

GP seven-day pilot schemes being abandoned in blow to Conservatives' access drive

Exclusive A CCG has cancelled a seven-day GP access pilot after it failed to reduce pressure on local A&E services, while others are considering cancelling theirs, Pulse has learned, casting further doubt on the Conservatives’ flagship scheme to create a seven-day GP service.

NHS Canterbury and Coastal CCG found that its scheme, which saw GPs opening from 9am to 1pm on Saturdays and Sundays from November to April, failed to help local A&Es meet the four-hour target over the period.

Local GP leaders across the country are also reporting that commissioners are considering cancelling other schemes, including one which is costing £70 per appointment.

The Conservatives have pledged to roll out seven-day GP access to all patients across England by 2020, and the Prime Minister’s Challenge Fund has recently allocated £100 million to a second wave of seven-day GP pilots.

The Government has said that this is partly to allow patients to see their GP outside working hours, but it has also claimed it will reduce pressures on A&E.

But GP leaders have said that commissioners’ doubts about the schemes demonstrate that seven-day access is not having the intended effects and was instead wasting NHS resources and worsening the GP workforce crisis.

The NHS Canterbury and Coastal CCG scheme, which was funded via CCG urgent care resilience funds, was aimed to ‘to help reduce pressure on busy A&E departments across East Kent’ as 40% of patients who attend A&E in the area ‘could appropriately be seen by a GP’, according to the CCG.

Dr Gaurav Gupta, a vice chair of Kent LMC whose practice hosted one of the weekend access points, told Pulse the CCG was hoping to prove that it was cost effective to continue beyond the pilot by reducing pressure on urgent care services.

However, a performance report published on the CCG website revealed that in January just 92.5% of patients were seen within four hours in A&E in east Kent, with continued struggles throughout February and March to reach the 95% target.

The report revealed that in total the CCG had spent around £8 million on various schemes to reduce pressures.

Dr Gupta said: ‘The CCG reviewed the pilot at the end of March and concluded it did not make sense to pursue it and so they wanted to scrap it. It continued through April because NHS England wanted it to continue for another month but it has now ended.

‘The CCG was trying to see if it made sense financially, or for patients’ care, so that they would extend it, but they didn’t think that it made sense [and] informed us of their decision.’

He said seven-day services ‘seems more like a political decision, rather than a patient care one’, while the patients mainly accessing the scheme were those ‘coming in to us for routine GP services’, therefore not relieving pressure on A&E.

Dr Mark Jones, chair of NHS Canterbury and Coastal CCG, said: ‘The pilot has been well received by patients in the three towns. Although we are pleased to see some correlation between the uptake of urgent appointments at the weekend and a reduction in A&E attendance, this has not been sufficient to continue with the pilot in its current format.

‘The data collected from the pilot will be important for the CCG, and individual practices, as we develop our intentions for the future design of a seven day service.’

Elsewhere, GPs also reported that weekend opening was not having the intended outcomes.

Dr John Ashcroft, exectuive officer at Derby and Derbyshire LMC, said that a scheme to open practices until 8pm each evening and 8am-8pm at weekends managed to fill 90% of appointments.

However, he added: ‘The number of appointments represents only about 1% of the appointments provided by the practices so isn’t likely to reduce workload perceptively, and hasn’t. But the average cost per appointment has apparently been over £70.’

Dr Kamal Sidhu, a GP in County Durham whose practice is partaking in a CCG-funded Saturday opening pilot, said his local scheme ‘has not been abandoned but the evidence suggests that it actually hasn’t made a difference to A&E attendances’.

Dr Mohammed Jiva, a GP in Middleton and a seven-day opening pioneer, said that the Greater Manchester schemes - which was the basis for Prime Minister David Cameron’s Challenge Fund - demonstrated that the ‘utilisation of appointments fell over the weekend with Sunday coming out the worst’.

GPC deputy chair Dr Richard Vautrey said he was not aware of specific evidence that seven-day pilots were being abandoned but said this could be ‘because very few of the pilots have been properly and independently evaluated’.

He added: ‘However, there is no evidence from the previous misguided implementation of a walk-in centre in every PCT that occurred with the Darzi plan under the last Labour government, that they made any reduction to hospital pressures. 

‘Providing routine seven-day services simply expands the service, and if anything could lead to an increase in hospital referrals as more patients are seen. If extra money is available it should be prioritised to invest in current GP urgent care services which would make a big difference to reducing the pressure on A&E.’

Pulse revealed in February that NHS England has extended the funding for the first wave of Challenge Fund pilots after admitting they required a ‘fuller evaluation’.

The Conservative Party was approached for comment.

Readers' comments (32)

  • Shame this didnt come to light a week or two earlier!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • As a GP, I have just voted in a "marginal" -and it wasn't for Hunt, who has committed "crimes" against the NHS.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Dear Ivan Bennett...........................

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Just Your Average Joe

    7 day access is a political gimmick.

    If you are ill enough you will be seen by appropriate OOH services, otherwise it can wait until normal opening hours.

    If is just like making an appointment for a bank or solicitor, you go in the appropriate working hours for your need, taking out the time from your daily routine to do it.

    7 day opening just makes it socially convenient to get non urgent self limiting problems seen, exposing excess demand, rather than reducing A&E pressures.

    Simple solution - stopping paying A&E to see minor ailments and pretty soon the hospitals will find ways to redirect the patients to GP services.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • NHS England asking for the scheme to continue for a month can only be seen as political interference.... So that the results were not known before the election.
    Why are they allowed to play politics like this?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Harry Longman

    I'm paying attention: we have evidence informing policy. This is a great day. Whoever wins, take note. What the NHS needs is to understand demand and improve efficiency. These schemes failed on both counts and hoorah! someone has had the sense to stop them.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I don't understand this schemes.

    They can't be for urgent care - patients should see OOH.
    They can't be for emergencies - patients should see A+E.

    So,

    They appear to be for routine appointments out of hours.

    Routine things like eczema or a verruca.

    Why is anyone surprised that treating verrucas or eczema at 7pm on a sunday does not reduce A+E attendance?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Having acknowledged that there is a crisis in GP recruitment how exactly are they going to staff 7/7 care?!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Either it's just another way to attack small independent practices to drive them out or it's a cynical attempt to win votes... or the politicians really are that stupid. Fund OOH properly and stop pretending it doesn't exist in order to reduce GP emergencies going to A&E.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • 7 day routine access is popular with some patients for convenience and on a smaller scale this is fine. But probably a waste of money. 7 day urgent access is already available via out of hours services, so why aren't A&Es diverting patients to them? As another comment says, stop paying A&Es for inappropriate patients and they will find cheap ways to divert them.

    The real answer here is to stop all this nonsense of trying to add bolt-ons to primary care because of childish fears that if you give it to GPs they will simply pocket the money and not improve the service. Yes, there's a risk some practices will do that, so make sure there are proper controls in place to prevent that. Even better, all GPs should be employed and then investment could be targeted where it's needed without political nonsense getting in the way. Independent contractor status is now seriously hampering the profession, because it's preventing investment.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page50 results per page

Have your say

IMPORTANT: On Wednesday 7 December 2016, we implemented a new log in system, and if you have not updated your details you may experience difficulties logging in. Update your details here. Only GMC-registered doctors are able to comment on this site.