This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

'Labour will put general practice at heart of NHS vision'

In full: Labour shadow health secretary Jonathan Ashworth's keynote address to the Pulse Live conference

It is a genuine pleasure to be here because Pulse is not only the persuasive voice of GPs, read by and influencing the very highest policy makers but equally Pulse stands in the fine tradition of campaigning journalism. From your campaigns in recent years against practice closures to most recently your dogged research highlighting the ‘cash for cuts’ referral incentives scheme.

This afternoon I want to offer a few reflections about the state of the NHS as we approach its 70th anniversary in July and offer some remarks on Labour’s thinking about how to ensure the National Health Service is sustainable in the future.

And the reason I so readily accepted the invitation to address you this afternoon is because I want this to be the beginning of an ongoing dialogue about the how we safeguard the future of the NHS.

I start with an absolute commitment to the value of list based general practice and ensuring universal access to primary care. The principle that everyone should have access to primary care when ill, free of charge, has endured since the creation of the health service 70 years ago and it’s a principle to which Labour steadfastly holds.

We know that general practice is not just highly valued by the public, accounting for 90 per cent of interactions with the NHS, but crucially as academic research has shown general practice is essential to a secure, effective and efficient health service too.

And the reason why, as we approach the 70th anniversary of the NHS and look to its next stage, we are so committed to strong general practice is because the health challenges we face over the next 20 years – from the ageing population with greater frailty in society, to the increasing prevalence of chronic conditions to widening health inequalities and the need to raise the health and wellbeing of the next generation – I believe all these challenges depend on high quality general practice and primary care.

So I want to put general practice at the heart of Labour’s vision for the NHS – the first building block in a health system which doesn’t just treat you when you’re sick but keeps you well in the first place.

But when I speak to GPs as I do often I hear very similar messages about the increasing, indeed some would go so far as to say intolerable pressures on them. The British Medical Association says that GPs are “exhausted”.

An ageing society places ever greater pressures on primary care as it does on secondary care and of course these demands will only increase as, for example, the number of over 85s doubles over the next 20 years. We are witnessing a relative shift away from acute illness, towards chronic conditions, multi-morbidities, cognitive impairments and long-term frailty. Over 50 per cent of older people have at least two chronic conditions and by 2035, the proportion of those with 4 or more diseases is set to double.

This is against a galling backdrop of falling GP numbers and wider vacancies, so far from being on track to deliver the 5,000 extra GPs the Government promised we have actually seen a fall of 720; meanwhile Pulse’s most recent annual survey of vacancies showed 12.2 per cent of all positions are currently vacant – an increase from the 11.7 per cent reported at the same time last year, and from a rate of 2.1 per cent when Pulse began collecting data in 2011. And far from investing in the wider primary care workforce there has been a fall of 343 General Practice Nurses too.

In deprived areas there tends to be the fewest GPs and nurses per 100,000 people. Yet talking to GPs who work in these areas they tell me there are greater pressures on their workload as changes to benefit systems, wider poverty and associated conditions like malnutrition have meant more patients presenting and we have more GPs now making referrals to foodbanks too.

There has been insufficient investment in training these last eight years at a time when we are in an increasingly competitive international environment as more middle income countries invest in their own health care systems. Canada, New Zealand and Australia have all become increasingly attractive locations not just for UK GPs but also for many of the international doctors who otherwise would have come to the UK to practice too. Of course Brexit has made the prospects for EU recruitment even more difficult. Meanwhile around 3,000 GPs retired before the age of 60 over these past five years and close to half of GPs are aged over 55 in parts of England.

Yet despite the pressures GPs tell me they consider their job an honour and a privilege and I’m not surprised that a survey this week revealed seven out of 10 GP partners say their practice delivers at least one non-core service not part of the core contract for no extra money from spirometry to ECG recordings, to post-operative suture removal to name a few.

So extraordinary, care and dedication despite the intense pressures.

But I’m also struck when I talk to GPs by how many worry and indeed fear their workload is unsafe.

One GP I spoke to, with over 20 years’ experience, told me she was often close to tears from exhaustion after a thirteen hour day, worried about the quality of the judgements she was making, “we don’t have the time to practice safely” she told me adding she “has to make decisions so quickly and under pressure.”

Or the young GP I spoke to, who said that her and her colleagues were attracted to general practice because they loved the values of general practice; loved looking after patients holistically over the long term. They want to get involved in local communities and build stable teams. They don't particularly want to do short term shift work. But they are finding it harder to manage the time pressures and feel that they often are working in an unsafe way so they look for other opportunities

This means we have young GPs who don’t feel they have the time to do the job to the standards they expect of themselves, who drop clinical time and indeed leave general practice all together. The remaining GPs have to work longer risking burn out. No wonder so many partners I speak to tell of their struggle to recruit younger GPs into long term roles

Therefore it seems to me that for too long we have taken that dedication for granted, allowed low morale and mistrust to fester.

Sadly I believe this low morale and mistrust has been exacerbated by the Bawa Garba case and the worry it has instilled in tired, overworked doctors who everyday are faced with managing risk, everyday have to make a judgment on whether or not to refer a patient.

As one GP partner told me recently the handling of this tragic case will lead to a sea change in practices limiting daily activity. The implications are obvious: greater pressures on access again risking even greater pressures on already stretched hospital A&Es and urgent care centres as well.

So what is Labour’s response?

We start from a belief that general practice is integral to helping us meet the challenges we face.

My Party has big ambitions to improve the quality of life and health of the population.

We want to see greater integration between health and social care;

We want to see health inequalities narrowing as we tackle the wider social determinants of ill health;

We want to reverse the years of neglect of mental health provision;

We want to tackle addiction in society

And for us every child matters so improving the health and wellbeing of our children will be a driving mission.

These are all important big ambitions that we can’t even begin to tackle without the major involvement of GPs and a properly resourced modern primary care service.

To that end we support the partnership model where it works and can recruit but equally we are aware that large parts of the country are indeed struggling to recruit GPs.

We don’t believe in a one size fits all solution so instead I want to work with GPs to develop models for the future including salaried GP models and indeed explore options with you for the future of the contract and the future of the Quality and Outcomes Framework which I think many agree hasn’t delivered as hoped for. And I want to begin a discussion with you about how we find more time for you to care and less time on managing bureaucracy. So I genuinely hope today can be the start of ongoing dialogue about what is possible, and reasonable for an incoming Labour government to expect of the GP workforce.

To be candid with you I don’t want to be a Secretary of State who issues unrealistic directives telling you to be open all day long 7 days week when the capacity simply isn’t there to deliver it, but in return I want to work with you to help improve quality across the board as that’s what patients expect.

And I want to work with you as we explore how we better integrate health and social care at a local level. Of course my Party will not support models that allow for greater privatisation in our NHS and we believe it’s increasingly clear that ever greater private sector involvement in the NHS is neither in the interests of the taxpayer, patients or NHS staff. Just take the example of Capita’s shambolic mishandling of the general practice patient records contract. The cost of fixing this for NHS England was £6.6 million.

So the next Labour Government is committed to eliminating privatisation with as little structural disruption as possible. Over the coming months we want to commence a discussion with GPs, primary care professionals and others across the NHS about the best way we can abolish the purchaser-provider split, get rid of wasteful and unnecessary competition in the NHS and replace it with truly local partnerships to deliver the fairest, most equitable and best quality care for local patients, their families and carers.

On workforce I can confirm that we as a Party will honour the commitment in the General Practice Forward View to recruit 5,000 extra GPs alongside commitments on the wider primary care workforce too.

Part of the challenge is making sure enough new recruits are coming through, and encouraging medical students to choose general practice. I was struck by the Royal College of GP’s Destination GP report that found that negative perceptions of general practice discourage some from joining the profession at a time when we urgently need more GPs. The latest recruitment figures show that 3157 were recruited into GP training for 2017, below the target of 3250. Although this is an increase on past years, it’s not enough to reach the workforce goals we need to be hitting. So Labour will look at how we can make general practice more attractive to medical students.

Of course successful general practice is also about skill mix and a team working with and supporting the GPs. We believe more must be done to support General Practice Nurses. With large numbers of the workforce set to retire in the next few years – a recent survey by the Queens Nursing Institute suggested that up to a third of General Practice Nurses could retire by 2020 meaning mean a loss of 8,000 GPN’s. What’s more compared to acute or other community nurses there is a gap in terms and conditions between nurses working in general practice and those working in the wider NHS so I want to work with you in looking at how we support the wider practice team.

We believe community and surgery based pharmacists, practice nurses, health visitors, district nurses, specialist nurses for diabetes and asthma, physiotherapists, occupational therapists, dieticians, geriatricians all have a vital contribution to make to patient care. My colleague Julie Cooper, Labour’s Shadow Minister for Community Care, will be leading a consultation on how we can ensure that Primary Care is an integral part of an NHS Workforce strategy that not only ensures that the service is adequately staffed, but respects and values the professional expertise of all staff.

Finally let me say a word about health and social care funding.

We know the NHS is suffering from the biggest financial squeeze in its 70 years history. Social care provision has been devastated by £6 billion worth of cuts not only putting intense pressures on the acute sector but placing huge pressures on GPs as well. General practice has seen its funding squeezed now getting a smaller percentage of the overall health budget.

In the acute sector we’ve seen a winter crisis likely to stretch beyond Easter, hospital wards at capacity. We are in a vicious circle. The squeeze on primary care driving more to secondary care while cancelled elective operations and growing RTT lists in turn place more pressures on GPs supporting those waiting longer in pain and distress for procedures and operations.

So I agree we do need a long term investment plan for our NHS and care sector, urgently, patients simply should not be expected to wait any longer.

But when we see waiting lists at around 4million, when we see ambulances backed up outside overcrowded hospitals, when we see operations cancelled not just electives but cancer operations too, when we see elderly confused vulnerable patients stranded on trollies in the corridors of bursting wards then I’m afraid a nod and wink from the Prime Minister isn’t good enough.

My Party is prepared to take the tough decisions for the long term sustainability of the NHS, we would make different choices on levels of taxation and this year boost NHS spending by an extra £5 billion.

Because the future sustainability of the NHS depends on the future of the social care system too we would allocate an extra £1 billion to stabilise the social care sector this year as part of an extra £8 billion across a Parliament.

Our shadow social care minister Barbara Keeley is developing plans for a national care service and has confirmed the next Labour government will implement a maximum limit on care costs at a more generous level than currently set in the Care Act regulations and we will also raise the asset threshold to a more generous level than it is under the current system too.

You know as well as we do that in the future of the NHS depends on quality health service provision in the wider community.

So we will ring fence and expand public health budgets including creating a new £500 million child health fund to invest in our ambitions to improve the health and well-being of every child. We will also ring fence and expand mental health services budgets to genuinely deliver the parity of esteem patients deserve.

My party has long campaigned for a fair deal for NHS staff but we want to go further than the Government’s offer. We will bring back the training bursary to recruit the nurses, midwifes and allied health professionals of the future and to support the existing workforce rather than cutting Continuing Professional Development we will invest in it.

And we will establish a £10 billion capital investment fund to invest in our NHS infrastructure, buildings, beds, latest equipment and technology.

These are the levels of investment that patients who have had a cancer operation cancelled or the elderly patient waiting hours in a hospital corridor needs now.

So the test of Theresa May is whether she genuinely delivers the significant long term investment package Labour is offering or whether it will turn out yet again to be more thin Tory gruel.

Given how central primary care is to our future vision of the NHS, absolutely key to our ambitions to tackling ill health and wider heath inequalities in society, general practice will get its fair share of this investment too.

A Labour government will honour the spending commitments made in the General Practice Five Year Forward View and we will ensure the amount spent on general practice and primary care rises as a proportion of the overall NHS budget.

Primary Care has suffered from a decade of underinvestment in infrastructure. We know quality primary care depends on high quality modern safe facilities not crumbling buildings that have not been upgraded for years or ancient IT systems running on slow networks unable to cope with the demands that modern health care systems need when sharing data. We also know there is more that can be done to embrace modern technology to offer convenient and different types of access to those who want it.

So as part of our overall infrastructure plans we will establish a national programme of primary care modernisation starting with a £500 million primary care capital fund to support the upgrade of facilities and investment in new technology.

In closing there is much to admire about primary care in the UK and some of the services around the country rank among the best in the world.

I want us to work together to ensure general practice and primary care to flourish for the long term.

My promise to you: better funded general practice, better support for the primary care workforce and a long term plan to give you the time to care for your patients and do the best possible job as the bedrock of our NHS.

Thank you

Rate this article  (1.83 average user rating)

Click to rate

  • 1 star out of 5
  • 2 stars out of 5
  • 3 stars out of 5
  • 4 stars out of 5
  • 5 stars out of 5

0 out of 5 stars

Readers' comments (3)

  • Empty words.!!!
    Nobody wants to tackle real problem of increasing demand and rising pressure on GP and frontline NHS staffs and chronic underfunding. All of us having to do more work for same or even less money, Endless stressful hours and when you are in difficulty your own organisation not supporting you.

    Wish NHS collapses soon as in its current form its not sustainable with all these sticking plaster measures

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Read em and weep suckers.
    More central control, less choice all round, and less money for doing the same job.
    Be careful what you wish for......

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Vinci Ho

    First of all , I am never a fan for any political party . But I do know the ABC fundamentals of politics : one has to ‘convince’ the public as well as your colleagues but even more importantly, it is about winning the authority to govern an institution , organisation and subsequently the country .
    There is no doubt the current Labour Party leadership had created some ‘miracles’ last two years . JC had risen from ‘who is he?’ to a well known leader of a shadow cabinet labelled as the ‘government-in-waiting’. The real question , however , is ‘how long is the waiting?’ .
    As I wrote before , the current political events seemed to have given a windfall of fortunes to the PM ; the support from NATO (hence EU and US) of her pre-emptive response to the Salisbury chemical agent (Novichok) attack against Russia , was pervasive. The inquiry undertaken by the electoral commission on the Cambridge Analytica-Leave Vote-BeLeave fiasco will join a dotted line ,eventually leading back to the two Secretaries of State , namely Foreign and Environment.
    This had certainly given her the ‘appetite’ to turn to domestic issues . In fact , her political aides had certainly learnt the lesson of slippery slope from the general election last year , repackaging the ‘pledges’ .She now wants to use NHS and education as selling points for her version of Brexit .
    While the prime minister thought she might now have a fair chance to sustain her premiership up to the next general election in 2022 , the Labour Party appears to be looking for an earlier democratic verdict. But is reality politics kind to JC and his shadow chancellor?

    xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    Well , first of all , Labour’s stance on Brexit remains obscure and questionable . The latest comment from the shadow foreign secretary about the ‘blah , blah , blah ‘ divorce concerning Brexit and the likelihood of passing the final EU deal in parliament under the stipulation of Labour’s own Six Tests’ , was precarious and careless .
    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2018/mar/29/fox-encouraged-by-thornberry-comment-on-blah-blah-blah-brexit-deal
    This gifted the international trade secretary a golden opportunity to grab some political brownie points immediately in terms of the conclusion that Labour will support the government in this final hurdle anyway .
    Labour’s support to continue EU customs union is clearly not enough to solve the the border issue in Ireland/Northern Ireland.
    Then , it is always about the ideologies advocated by the shadow chancellor who opened admitted his admiration on Marx/Lenin/Trotsky.
    https://www.newstatesman.com/politics/uk/2016/03/exclusive-john-mcdonnell-named-lenin-and-trotsky-his-biggest-influences-2006
    And of course , his habit of using swear words in public had not helped the cause . The ‘price’ of public figures is , always, a lesser freedom in carefree speech of insouciance. The argument is simply that one has more power than ordinary people.Perhaps, this is a lesson for the shadow foreign secretary to learn as well.
    Last , certainly not the least , the latest controversy on JC’s public apology about anti-semitism within his party had just opened a can trapping all the worms inside. The resignation of Christine Shawcroft from NEC was inevitable, perhaps reluctant but symptomatic of the syndrome. The argument is always about the fine line between disagreeing to the belligerence of Israel government on its neighbours and actual racial discrimination . How much is down to ignorance with cruel intentions or political insensitivity is unfathomable.
    Suddenly, Labour Party had become something else:
    ‘’Labour Party 'not connected' to abusive anti-Jewish messages - BBC News’’
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-43609296
    Once again , Facebook was the culprit; ‘’pro-Jeremy Corbyn Facebook groups that feature anti-Semitic, racist and abusive comments’’ can seriously destroy the credibility of him as the next prime minister.
    Together with the ideologies supported by the shadow chancellor as well as the rapidly gaining Momentum, my concern is a reminiscence of the old Third International (1919-1943).
    So while there is no doubt that it serves as an more effective opposition, the Labour Party is yet at a distance to force the hands of the government for an earlier general election.
    xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

    It is uncommon to see a senior politician willing to write an article directly on this platform (even the health secretary was only willing to give Q and A interviews). Simply , it has demonstrated how influential Pulse has become as far as opinions on NHS and GP are concerned. Thanks to the last two editors , Steve Nowottny and Nigel Praities.
    But it also shows , in my opinion ,the pivotal role of NHS and its gatekeeper(general practice)that politicians must consider if they want their party to triumph in the next general election , whenever it will take place.
    Everything mentioned in this article are issues we have been fighting for long . In fact , so long as such that any addressing by politicians had become meaningless without concrete , realistic and tangible solutions. Empty pledges with figures do not win any vote from us , quite frankly . Solid actions like full reimbursement of GP indemnities , setting actual upper limit of how many patients a GP can see daily , increasing GP funding to the level of 12-13% of the total health budget etc. , are not big asks considering the crisis of recruitment and retention driven by extremely low morale.
    After 70 years , I think NHS has earned the right to have a constitutional status, although we do not have a constitution actua
    in this country . The gatekeeper of this institution has become so exhausted simply because people had underestimated its importance ,ignoring the need to strengthen and repair the gate . The so called ‘goodwill’ of the gatekeepers had evaporated rapidly and frankly , any government needs us more than we need it.
    And for our junior colleagues , it would be naive to imagine that they had ‘forgiven’ the health secretary for the way they were treated during their strike action two years ago . They do not need any of us to tell them how bad the situation in NHS and general practice had become.
    The story of Dr BG was only the tip of iceberg of a grossly underfunded health system with a constant paranoia of ‘something would go wrong everyday’ , yet heavily scrutinised by regulators (CQC, GMC etc) which are only interested in witch hunting and scapegoating , with a superhero complex to ,so called, protect the public .
    The general consensus among our colleagues is GMC being no longer fit for practice and one would not be surprised that one would question the integrity of the GMC chief executive.
    As our most respectable veteran colleague, Julian Tudor Hart ,wrote in BMJ 2016 , he correctly asked the question :
    ‘’Should we not recognise at least the possibility of a different hypothesis: that in the eyes of majority public opinion, responsibility for collapse of the NHS as we have known it might seem transferable from government to healthcare professionals?’’

    http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2016/09/07/julian-tudor-hart-government-healthcare-professionals-and-the-peoples-nhs-time-for-a-new-hypothesis/

    Well , the answer to this question a resounding ‘Yes’ now .
    xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    The world has already become more dangerous : western democratic countries being divided by extreme political ideologies cheered by populism ; Neo-totalitarianism (my terminology) fuelled by repackaged imperialism being on the rise . Nationalism is merely a rhetoric exploited by those with sheer greed for power.
    I believe , as health professionals swearing the Hippocratic Oath , we always have a role in overseeing the behaviour and policies of the government and its politicians for the sake of our patients , hence , people.
    Clearly in here ,on one hand , we do not need a 21st century Weimar Republic constantly threatened by the rise of a Third Reich. And on the other , there is no place for a new Third International trying to overcome its ‘enemies’ by bombarding people with rhetorics of class struggle or dialectical materialism etc. History has already given human beings expensive lessons in flesh and blood.
    Ultimately, Charles Dickens was absolutely right when he wrote ,

    ‘’.....in short, the period was so far like the present period, that some of its noisiest authorities insisted on its being received, for good or for evil, in the superlative degree of comparison only.’’

    Happy Easter holidays.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say