This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Read the latest issue online

A faulty production line

NHS chief executive wants 'one-stop' GP practices to do 'all of the -ologies'

Exclusive NHS chief executive Simon Stevens has told Pulse that he sees a future where GP practices do 'all of the -ologies' currently done in outpatient departments, including things like cardiology.

Mr Stevens' comments are the first indication of the extent to which secondary care services may move into general practice, following health secretary Jeremy Hunt's announcement last month that they will be going through 'condition by condition' to see which can be handled in general practice 'one-stop shops' rather than in hospital.

Speaking to Pulse after NHS England’s 2016 Annual General Meeting, Mr Stevens said that he envisaged ‘cardiology, diabetology, all of the –ologies’ falling under general practice management in future.

He added that he wants to end the current system where ‘patients are sent off with a referral and the next contact comes when the GP receives a letter from the consultant’s medical secretary weeks or months later’.

And though plans are at an early stage, an NHS England spokesperson told Pulse that they want to ‘expand dramatically’ on models tested in NHS England new care model 'vanguard' areas.

This included an an east London ‘virtual outpatients’ model which has sought to reduce renal referrals as consultants give GPs input as close to real-time as possible.

It also included the East Hampshire MCP vanguard's pilot where consultant respiratory physicians attended asthma, COPD and breathlessness 'carousel clinics' across rural GP practices - with plans to roll out a similar model for diabetes building on work done in Portsmouth.

Clinical lead for the East Hampshire MCP Dr Kathryn Bannell told Pulse that, after nine months, 'the reduction in emergency admissions for asthma and breathlessness clinics was 100%' while for COPD 'the reduction was 55%'.

As the scheme is now set to expand, the MCP is considering using GP hubs to house clinics and having consultant input delivered remotely rather than in person.

Dr Bannell said: 'The hard data on outcomes from the pilot was absolutely unbelievable.'

An NHS England spokesperson said: ‘There are more opportunities to better integrate consultant outpatient services and the support offered by GPs, particularly for patients with long-term medical conditions such as diabetes, rheumatology and heart problems.

‘This is now happening in places such as Tower Hamlets, Portsmouth and Northumbria, and we now want to expand this dramatically.’

GPC deputy chair Dr Richard Vautrey said: 'Practices would welcome developing stronger links with their local specialist colleagues and sharing management in a way that reduced the need for patients to attend hospital.

‘But we need to ensure this is done in a way that doesn’t just shift more unfunded work on to the already over-burdened shoulders of GPs.'

The move to GP 'one-stop' shops

Speaking at the Best Practice Conference last month, health secretary Jeremy Hunt said that under his ‘GP one-stop programme’, the NHS will be going through ‘condition by condition’ to see which can be handled in general practice rather than secondary care going forward.

He said that he thought patients would prefer if their problems were 'sorted out inside general practice' and that's why they would look at 'what barriers we can remove centrally to allow more of this work to happen in general practice'.

He admitted that this meant asking GPs to ‘do more work’ but said that they would be ‘paid for doing that’ and argued that it would also ‘make life more rewarding for doctors’.

Readers' comments (37)

  • A similar system has existed in Sweden for years. They are in as big a financial mess as we are.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Is this an excuse to try to find a reason to close all the smaller NHS hospitals down?

    The thought of having to deal with vast amounts of extra consultations at a higher more complex level will also drive the few existing gps away. Who could afford this increased indemnity?

    So if this came to pass bingo no NHS!!!

    I think Hunt will be trying to implement this as soon as he can before the GP system collapses and he can not use them as a legitimate place to divert the expensive consultant's work in order for him to close down the hospitals the endangered consultants work in.
    He is a clever boy that Hunt!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Hey guess where this is heading
    After a bit each GP will learn how to correctly manage this and that
    No bad thing in itself of course but once again
    it's politicians not respecting what GP's
    DO !! with their time
    Oh sorry that will be done by nurses
    One more ( possibly the last) nail in the coffin
    of what makes General Practice a worthwhile
    career choice
    Oh sorry we are all failed Hospital doctors
    are we not I forgot

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • How about a new game. Wait to hear about any new health announcements and then guess the underlying reasons behind them.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Last time I tried to bring some secondary care into my rural surgery I was told by senior nhs managemeant that it was too inefficient and led to inequality.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Been there - done that - back in the 1990s. It was an inefficient use of resources then and will be again now.

    We are short of all generalists - not just in primary care. Having your local chest physician (for instance) traipsing from centre to centre where he or she cannot supervise their team, deal with emergencies or have immediate access to imaging is incredibly inefficient.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Stevens is a disingenuous fool. Doing the ologies in Primary Carer-yeah, right.Most GPs cannot even read an ECG for themselves with any degree of confidence so cardiology provision will be wonderful.
    I've have worked as a GP for too many years now and the ability of most to do anything beyond the most superficial level is sorely lacking. This, I believe, reflects the broad but shallow training GPs have which, when presented with a proper-ology case, will be found to be lacking.I also feel that in order to have a workable system where such a hitherto faulty vision may work would require a collaborative effort of say a number of doctors who have for example MRCP, MRCOG, FRCS, MRCPsych etc between them. Stevens, apply your critical faculties, and try opening your eyes, before spouting such empty rubbish.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • asking a consultant to come to a gp practice is gross misuse of time. other practices suffer. in fund holding days bigger practices had lot of money and could purchaser this. others suffered.
    are they trying to make gp practices as one cottage hospital as it used to be 60 years ago and close down small practices?? i think so.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • We already do all the ologies, fool. Until we reach our competence and/or resource limits. Then we refer.

    Would you like us to act beyond our competence? No.

    Would you like to increase resource? (Meaning manpower as well as money). Super.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • So Simon Stevens and Hunt, both non clinical professionals are going to go through the ologies one by one to decide which can be managed in GP practices by a remote clinician?
    This is a clear example of how expertise has been downgraded in decision making and is very dangerous indeed.
    Everyone with any knowledge about it said that Lansleys reforms would be a disaster. They still ploughed on. Can't see any hands held up or responsibility taken for that.
    Rather than stepping back and wondering what went wrong they are just ploughing forward into anoth balls up. Ultimately it doesn't matter if you are running Sainsbury's. It kind of does matter (more) if you are running healthcare.
    Get out and work privately. You can work to your own moral and professional ethical standards and not to the current distorted ones.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page50 results per page

Have your say