Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Nine in ten GPs think Jeremy Hunt should go

Exclusive Almost 90% of GPs believe that Jeremy Hunt should step down as health secretary, a Pulse survey reveals.

The poll of 817 GPs found that 87% of the profession believed that Mr Hunt should resign or be removed from his post, while more than 95% said they did not have confidence in his ability to manage the health service.

Just 19 GPs (2.5%) said they did have confidence in the way Mr Hunt was managing the health service, while 48 (6%) said he should not be removed from his post.

GPs responding to the survey said Mr Hunt - who became the longest serving health secretary since the establishment of the NHS this week - was described by respondents as ‘rigid’, ‘arrogant’ and ‘statistically illiterate’.

It comes as Mr Hunt has been heavily criticised for his imposition of a contract on junior doctors and his plans for a seven-day NHS, becoming the first health minister to preside over an all-out strike by the profession.

The LMCs Conference next week in London is set to debate a motion of no confidence in the health secretary, calling for his ‘immediate resignation’ - following a similar motion which failed back in 2013.

GPs have criticised him for pressing ahead with routine weekend GP appointments despite the evidence revealing a lack of patient demand, while his ‘new deal’ for general practice was described by the BMA annual representatives meeting as putting the ‘very existence’ of general practice in danger.

The General Practice Forward View has been more warmly received, despite a lot of scepticism, but was notably announced by NHS chief executive Simon Stevens, with very little input from the health secretary.

However, the main criticisms against Mr Hunt focused on his misuse of scientific data, specifically regarding the drive towards seven-day services. 

Dr Alison Bonavia, a partner in Hartlepool, said: ‘It feels as if the message to the public is being manipulated both in terms of the statistics/risks quoted and also that the issue is about rate of pay on Saturdays - this is not the overall concern of doctors.’

Jeremy Hunt’s questionable use of ‘weekend effect’ data

emergency admissions square PPL

emergency admissions square PPL

emergency admissions square PPL

The survey findings come as major new studies reveal that statistics used by health secretary Jeremy Hunt to justify the Government’s push for a seven-day service may be inaccurate.

Mr Hunt has repeatedly quoted the ‘weekend effect’ in his arguments for the Government’s mandate to provide a 7-day NHS, saying that greater staffing levels at hospitals over the weekend could prevent 6,000 deaths. The statistics quoted by Hunt are based on a study published in the BMJ in 2015 by Professor Nick Freemantle.

But four new studies over the past week have revealed that in fact, fewer patients die after being admitted to hospital at the weekend, with academics claiming that the Government’s push for a seven-day service is ‘fixing a problem that doesn’t exist.’

Two studies in the Lancet state that the weekend effect is a ‘major oversimplification’ of a complex pattern of weekly changes in quality of care which are unlikely to be addressed by just increasing the availability of hospital doctors on Saturdays and Sundays.

A further as-yet unpublished study found that studies demonstrating the ‘weekend effect’ have been based on flawed coding.

Dr Serena Jones, a partner in Herefordshire, said that Mr Hunt’s unwillingness to engage with doctors on the matter of seven-day working and the junior doctors’ contract had seen ‘everyone lose respect and confidence in him.’

She said: ‘He appears ignorant and doesn’t seem to want to hear about the struggles we all face.’

Referring to the ongoing row between Mr Hunt and junior doctors, London GP partner Dr May Cahill warned that Hunt’s dismissive attitude towards doctors’ concerns about the changes to the NHS, had alienated the next generation of health professionals in England.

She said: ‘His general attitude towards the profession and his decision to impose a contract on junior doctors that is going to ruin recruitment and retention. He is the first health minister in history to preside over an all-out strike by doctors. I can’t understand why he is still in his job.’

Other GPs argued that while Mr Hunt was unpopular with GPs, criticisms should also be levelled at others in Government backing the seven-day NHS plan, including the Prime Minister and the chancellor.

Dr Julie Draper from the Wirral argued: ‘[Mr Hunt] is doing what he is able to within a very limited budget and increasing demand. It must be remembered that he is just the face of the health service management and the majority of the policy design and implementation is done by civil servants not the health minister.’

The Department of Health spokesperson said: ’As any credible pollster would tell you, a self-selecting poll can always be expected to skew towards the negative. Given that these questions were sent to several thousand GPs, this would suggest a high proportion expressed no negative view.’

Do you have confidence in the way the health secretary is managing the health service?

Yes: 2%

No: 96%

Don’t know: 2%

 

Do you think Jeremy Hunt should resign or be removed from his post?

Yes: 87%

No: 6%

Don’t know: 7%

The survey was launched on 28 April 2016, collating responses using the SurveyMonkey tool. The 24 questions asked covered a wide range of GP topics, to avoid selection bias on one issue. The survey was advertised to readers via our website and email newsletter, with a prize draw for a Samsung HD TV as an incentive to complete the survey. A total of 817 GPs answered this question. 

 

Readers' comments (41)

  • The most amazing thing about this survey is that 13% of our flock (aka the dozing sheep) still think he should stay.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • A victory for Hunt, I believe if we use the way he plays with statistics.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Gobsmacked that 13% don't think he should resign or be sacked. Oh well, I suppose that's the 13% who are on the board of RCGP, GPC, CQC etc. No doubt Maureen welcomes the survey showing that so many people support Jeremy.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Omg It Is Him

    Include me - now this makes 10 out 10 GPs thinks he should- no MUST- go. It is all in the wording!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The well paid spokesperson(the spin doctors) of the DOH has done the spin on behalf of Mr Hunt by rejecting the figures. Just how the politics and ideology of this man works.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • For all the reasons cited above -he should go-but he won't un til he has demolished the NHS in general and primary care in particular.He is a Cameronite after all.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Proof that one in ten GPs has got significant mental health issues.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Peter Swinyard

    I think he would tell us that a 13% confidence rating gives him a mandate...

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • 95% Mr Hunt hardly a ringing endorsement of you or your government from a selection of the workforce of the jewel in the crown of the NHS.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • For the LMC this is clear no confidence vote on this man.

    He cannot visit hospitals due to 98% of juniors voted against his contract and he imposes it. 90% of GPs will not welcome him in their practice. Mr Hunt has to go.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page50 results per page

Have your say

IMPORTANT: On Wednesday 7 December 2016, we implemented a new log in system, and if you have not updated your details you may experience difficulties logging in. Update your details here. Only GMC-registered doctors are able to comment on this site.