This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Read the latest issue online

A faulty production line

RCGP plans to cut staff posts and undergo restructure in bid to balance books

Exclusive: The RCGP is planning a major restructure, including merging some college functions and making some staff positions redundant, in a bid to cut costs - and will also rent out a floor of its new headquarters.

Emails from RCGP chief executive Neil Hunt, obtained by Pulse, warn of ‘difficulties in balancing the budget’ and state that the college will ‘need to lose some posts as a result’. The college has begun a consultation this week on reorganising its activity, and has also decided to rent out a floor of its new headquarters at 30 Euston Square in central London in order to raise funds.

The college will begin making repayments on the loan used to buy and refit the new headquarters in 2014.

In the email sent on 28 March to the management team at the college, Mr Hunt said: ‘As you know and as confirmed in today’s update message, we continue to experience difficulties in balancing the budget and as a result, a number of significant proposals which impact on the staffing structure and potentially on some roles were considered by the trustee board yesterday morning.’

‘My hope is that we will be able to re-organise some areas of activity in a way that helps us to deliver the strategic plan and will optimise income generation. However, we will also need to lose some posts as a result.’

He added: ‘Clearly all proposals that may impact on staff will be subject to detailed consultation. This will begin on Monday 8 April.’

In a second email to staff members, also sent on 28 March, Mr Hunt said the college’s leadership team had been looking into how to make savings for some months.

‘Whilst we have made significant progress we are still operating way beyond our means,’ he added. ‘Trustee Board have now authorised me to do some further work on the budget and I am considering options for merging some functions.’

The college said it ‘was in a much better situation than many other organisations’ and had acted ‘prudently’ to close its final salary pension scheme.

A spokesperson said: ‘The college, like many organisations in the current economic climate, is having to make cost savings. We are considering, and consulting on, a number of options for achieving this.’

She confirmed that there were plans to rent out a floor of the college’s headquarters which is surplus to requirements, and said this would be to a ‘health-related professional body’.

‘Discussions are at an advanced stage but not yet concluded so we cannot comment further,’ she said. ‘A formal announcement will be made when contracts are signed.’

The spokesperson also said there were no immediate plans to raise members’ fees: ‘The college is acutely aware of the current financial pressures on its members - many of whom are facing salary decreases in real terms - and works hard to keep increases to a minimum. The subscription notice for this financial year was sent to members in March as usual and there are no plans to raise membership fees beyond the inflationary rises that have been agreed by the Trustee Board and implemented from 1 April 2013. Next year’s subscription level will be set as normal as part of the annual budget process.’

RCGP chair Professor Clare Gerada told Pulse the restructuring would have little impact on members of the profession: ‘GPs can still expect excellent support, excellent CPD - very little will change. It would be ridiculous to put royal medical colleges outside of other organisations that are all having to make tough choices.’

Dr Richard Vautrey, GPC deputy chair and an RCGP Council member, said: ‘All representative organisations are finding it difficult in the current financial climate, leaving them with difficult decisions to make.’

‘It’s important that the RCGP does all it can to make appropriate savings and so avoid putting additional costs on to its members who are also struggling with a probable pay cut following the Government’s interference with the DDRB award.’

Dr John Grenville, medical secretary for Derbyshire LMC, said it was a ‘shame’ that the college had been been forced to look at restructuring due to budgetary concerns.

He said: ‘I hope the college is doing what it can to continue providing support and advice to those who need it.’

But Dr Peter Davies, RCGP Council member and a GP in Yorkshire, said the restructure would make the college stronger.

‘In the long run it’ll be good for the college,’ he said. ‘These sort of reviews happen in every organisation. It’ll be a review of functions, and how we use the money to service general practice.

He added that there should not be any regret about the move to the new headquarters, saying it was one of the best things that had happened to the college.

He added: ‘It allows us to do so much more. It’s not just a building. It’s a platform from which we can enhance the profession’s standing and continue work on behalf of the speciality.’


Readers' comments (43)

  • What sad news. That's ruined my day.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Hazel Drury

    My hear bleeds for them. Not.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I thought the College had just been restructured? Wasn't there recently a hoo-haa over the College becoming a 'global brand'? They have been advertising new jobs all over the place. Is the restructure already being restructured? Clearly the College has been taking lessons from the NHS on how to create perpetual and turmoil!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I had to read this article twice. It makes you wonder who is running the place. Neil Hunt or Jeremy Hunt?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Our faculty rep told us about a restructure over a year ago. Is this a different one? We haven't been alerted to another one. If it is a separate one, why was the first one not properly budgeted and planned in the first place? There's enough uncertainty and change within general practice without our leaders exacerbating matters.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • This year I have been mostly refusing to pay membership for RCGP and RCPSG (Glasgow). What do I get for it??? To be fair the surgical college costs less than half and if RCGP were to reduce fees then I would consider but I have 500 quid to spend on my family holiday.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Hi Hazel. I feel so bad for your hear.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I attended a College conference in Edinburgh back in 2007/8? and learnt about the RCGP's search for a new HQ. So the College has either failed to plan for its expansion despite years of notice or bought too expensive a building. No matter how many jobs are cut, GPs will pay for this inexcusable error through higher member fees, training courses, conferences or exam fees! Or we will end up in the pocket of pharma companies through unethical sponsorship. Maybe the new HQ will be called Pfizer House?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The college is Us- GPs who see patients and get the work done. The college represents the highest standards of professionalism, which help define what kind of doctors we are, and what our place is the medical system is. The GPC make the detailed contracts for us, but most of the thinking about who and what we are, and what our contribution could and should be is done in the years before detailed contract negotiations begin. If you want to be a flourishing member of a flourishing profession you need the college to be able to do its work well- even better contribute to it.

    College work is largely about influence and shaping the conversation into the future- the work we are doing now may not beneficial to us directly or immediately- but if we do it well it will make life better for those younger doctors coming after us.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Dr Davies, I agree with you. However, there's nothing in this article to suggest this will be achieved. The first restructure - which we the members already paid for - was clearly ill thought through, not budgeted for and unsuccessful. Within 12 months, here is another restructure. With the catalogue of College errors over the last 12 months (CSA exam, Presidential election, Chairman's election, an unfinished new HQ), my confidence in College leadership is low to say the least. I hope Council members and officers do the decent thing, reflect upon their serial failed performance and make way for competent replacements.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page50 results per page

Have your say