This site is intended for health professionals only
Thursday 23 February 2012
Facebook Twiter Linkedin

Dozens of GP practices put out to tender under APMS as PCTs prepare to wind down

By Gareth Iacobucci | 16 Aug 2011

Exclusive Dozens of GP practices across England face an uncertain future as PCTs prepare to close or retender practices run by their provider arms ahead of the switch to GP commissioning in 2013.

A Pulse investigation reveals the vast majority of PCT-run practices in England have been re-tendered or are in the process of being re-tendered under APMS, in a move that GP leaders have criticised.

Figures from the NHS Information Centre show a total of 84 PCT-run practices remained in September 2010, and our analysis reveals at least two of those are closing and asking patients to transfer elsewhere.

Of 71 PCTMS practices to be analysed by Pulse, two, the Globe Surgery in South East Essex, and the Manzoori Clinic in West Kent, are due to close, while the future of a further eight practices (three in Lincolnshire, two in East Lancashire and three in the North East) is currently being consulted on.

Six practices have reverted to GMS or PMS contracts, while 11 have been transferred to social enterprises formed from old PCT provider arms, and 41 have either been re-tendered or are due to be re-tendered.

Dr Chaand Nagpaul, GPC negotiator, said decisions on potential closures of PCT-run practices had to be taken very carefully: ‘There may be instances where there is not a need but each case needs to be taken on its own individual merit.'

He added that there was no reason why PCTMS practices had to transfer to APMS contracts.

Dr Nagpaul said: ‘There is no compulsion to re-tender under APMS. There are inherent merits to GMS, and also PMS. They are more cost-effective, and provide greater continuity of care.'

One GP who is facing redundancy when his PCTMS practice closes warned that vulnerable patients could be placed at risk by the closures.

Dr Mark Stott, a GP in Westcliff-on-Sea in south east Essex, said his 1,300-patient practice was being shut down.

‘They are going to close it,' he said. 'We are a practice for vulnerable patients. We have 1,300, including 400 nursing home patients, many Eastern European patients who don't speak any English, and homeless.'

‘The plan is to force all of these people into surrounding practices. I am sure it will have an adverse impact upon their care.'

Dr Stott said both he and his practice nurse were facing redundancy and an uncertain future when the practice closes. 

He said: ‘I'm in my early 50s, I don't know if I'll get another job after this. I can't get a partnership because there aren't any.'

Carolyn Larsen, associate director for primary care commissioning for the NHS South Essex cluster, said the planned closure was backed by patients and other stakeholders.

Ms Larsen said: ‘Patient, staff and clinical opinion is very important to the PCT to ensure patients receive the appropriate care. We have already consulted extensively with patients and stakeholders and our plans take account of their preferred options. ‘

‘A letter has been sent to all patients on the practice list to inform them of the plans, explaining that we are working to arrange for a local practice to take responsibility for providing services for the entire practice list including patients living in care homes.  We shall be able to provide more information when the proper selection procedures have been completed.'

A Department of Health spokesperson said there was no directive from Government to close PCTMS practices, but that it was up to PCTs to decide how best to commission care.

The spokeswoman added: ‘We've sent guidance to all SHAs back in January to remind that any PCTMS practices will need to be re-tendered. The guidance is so PCTs don't get to April 2013 with contracts that aren't legal anymore.

‘We're not anticipating any closures – but any closures that might be made would be a decision for the PCTs to take.'

 

MAP OF PCT-RUN PRACTICES


View PCT-run GP practices in a larger map

READERS' COMMENTS

Mary Hawking, GP Partner,
16 Aug 2011
It sounds as though this was a practice developed to address specific unmet population needs.
I don't know the composition or sizes of the local GMS/PMS practices locally, but it seems unlikely that any practice will be able or willing to take on 1300 patients - especially when they contain large numbers of non-English speakers, homeless (is there any *legal* way of registering the homeless now?) and residential homes where, regardless of whether the home is a residential or nursing home, the health needs - and ability to attend surgery - are going to be far greater than for similar groups of patients still able to manage in the community, especially if - as I suspect - there will be neither immediate nor ongoing support beyond normal capitation fees.
From the point of view of the practice and the practices' existing patients, it would be folly.

The PCT has sent a letter to the patients (elderly frail carehome residents, non-English speaking - what languages? - and the homeless - for whom they apparently have postal addresses) as a consultation. What proportion will understand the letter - even if they receive it?

Surely it is being economical with the truth for the DH to say that they have directed SHAs to make sure all PCTMS practices need to be re-tendered - presumably with contracts extending more than 19 months from now - but the directions do not mean that either DH or SHA have any responsibility for the situation?

And finally, has anyone considered the patient groups for whom this PCTMS practice appears to have been created? frail elderly, non-English speakers and the homeless?
Average (0Votes)
Top
Edoardo Cervoni, Private GP,
16 Aug 2011
I could not agree more with Dr Stott's comment. Pulse kindly published my letter on the matter just last week (Letter | 09 Aug 11).
I would like to see the "science" behind this "merging" process.
Average (0Votes)
Top
Anonymous, Practice Manager,
16 Aug 2011
The PCT said 'we are working to arrange for a local practice to take responsibility for providing services for the entire practice list including patients living in care homes. We shall be able to provide more information when the proper selection procedures have been completed'. If this is the transfer of a whole service surely TUPE rules apply to the staff who currenlty provide the service!?
Average (0Votes)
Top
Sanjeev Juneja, GP Partner,
01 Dec 2011
I am a single handed GP and had an APMS contract forced on me after the GMS contract was annulled after a dissolution of partnership at will. The Trust and LMC agreed that the Practice contract had to be annulled as it was a joint contract with the partners and had to be tendered to a private provider
As the owner of the purpose built premises, I was given a 9 month APMS contract with GMS payments of £65 per patient. The MPIG was paid ( under APMS contract !) and linked to KPI's which were unrealistic to achieve. There was no room for negotiation - it was take it or leave it.
The tendering process has not started yet although there are 4 months remaining to the end of this 9 month period.
I have struggled to achieve the KPIs - both physically and financially but have managed to improve the QoF achievement already by 5 % with 4 months in hand.

Information obtained under the FOI shows that Medway NHS Trust pays almost 2.5 million pounds to another APMS provider locally with an almost equal list size of 3500 - they do run a walk in Centre- 7 days a week, 8am to 8 pm. I am paid 220000 of which the Trust intends to slash the MPIG fo around 24000 in the new contract offered and impose KPIs which may cut down income to 180,000 - qui9te a comparison to the 2.5 million.
The minimum payment to any of the 8 APMS providers is £135 per patient but one group is especially privileged getting a whopping 560,000 for just 1500 patients. And this is a posh area.
I have started providing an extended hours service from 7 am one day and 7:15 am a second day in the week - but still struggling and don't imagine how I could manage a Practice with a 20% further cut in payments.
The Trust insists that it is DoH demand that all Practices be privatised but then one GP has been given a new GMS contract in the County this year. So, are there two tier GPs - some better than the others. Is there any help from any quarter available for the local population and for me as a GP ?
The Practice is in Strood, one of the most deprived areas in Medway with the highest concentration of learning disabilities almost 1% of Practice population - Is it DoH priority to destroy Practices and pay less for patient care in deprived areas up to even 2 to 10 times than in more affluent areas?
Looking forward to advice and support ; sanjeev@juneja.info;
Average (0Votes)
Top
Sanjeev Juneja, GP Partner,
01 Dec 2011
P.S :Error in above post - the learning disability population is 0.01% of Practice pop and not 1%.
Average (0Votes)
Top

ADD YOUR COMMENTS

Please note You must be a registered user of PulseToday and logged in to add comments. Opinions expressed below are those of the writers and do not necessarily reflect those of PulseToday. Comments are considered in the public domain and may be used in future Pulse coverage. We accept no responsibility, legal or otherwise, for the accuracy or the content of member comments.

Comment*

You must be logged in to add a comment.Clickhere to login.

SIGN UP FOR EMAIL NEWSLETTERS

Keep up-to-date with the latest changes to the NHS, CPD and clinical guidelines. Sign up below or find out more.

POLL

Should GPs begin switching patients to atorvastatin immediately? Read the full story here

LATEST FORUM POSTS