This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Read the latest issue online

CAMHS won't see you now

Labour to 'toughen rules' on following NICE guidelines as part of 'wide-ranging review'

Exclusive Labour will implement a ‘wide-ranging’ review of NICE guidance, including a potential requirement for commissioners to report and explain any departures from NICE guidance.

A spokesperson for shadow health secretary Andy Burnham told Pulse that the party is considering ‘tougher rules’ on implementing NICE guidance.

Mr Burnham has previously hinted he wants NICE guidance to have ‘more clout’, arguing that ‘if [NICE] says something is worth doing, then it should be done everywhere’.

GP leaders have said that tougher rules would mean that NICE would have to consider costs ‘much more carefully’ if they were to work.

The move follows ongoing concerns around commissioners restricting access to NICE-recommended treatments in order to keep within budgets, while there has been increasing criticism from GPs that NICE guidelines are becoming detached from general practice.

A spokesperson for Mr Burnham told Pulse: ‘We are committed to setting up a wide-ranging review of NICE which will look at reforming the NICE technology appraisal process and setting tougher rules on implementing NICE guidance.’

‘Specifically the review will look at whether there should be a more robust approach to implementation of NICE guidance and appraisals, and if should there be a requirement on commissioners to report and explain any departure from NICE guidelines.’

However, GP leaders warned NICE would have to consider the cost implications of its guidelines for use in general practice if there was any mandatory requirement to follow NICE advice, and retain enough flexibility for GPs to use their own judgement where needed.

It follows a series of draft recommendations from NICE that have been criticised by GPs, with guidelines on diabetes called a ‘laughing stock’, proposals for antibiotic prescribing reports branded ‘pointless’ and announcements around asthma guidelines labelled potentially ‘dangerous’.

NICE has also come under fire from GP leaders over recent guidelines on lipid modification partly because of the significant workload burden recommendations to expand statin use will place on GPs, while Pulse revealed two-thirds of GPs were tending not to follow the new lipid guidelines recommending statin use at the lower, 10-year risk threshold of 10% because of doubts about the drugs’ safety in lower risk patients.

Dr Richard Vautrey, GPC deputy chair, said: ‘We have had concerns about postcode access to services and that is unacceptable. Having said that it is very difficult for many parts of the country to afford everything NICE recommends, so NICE would have to look at much more carefully [at the costs] when they make recommendations.

‘They would have to have a much better feel for whether something was fully fundable and that would include the impact on general practice, because one of the concerns we had have had consistently is [that] much of the NICE guidance does not take into account the workload pressures on general practice.’   

Dr Vautrey added that GPs have to be given the freedom to exercise their professional judgement in individual cases rather than stick to guidelines.

He said: ‘The chair of NICE has often said that NICE produce guidelines not tramlines, and we have to allow clinicians to use their professional judgement to step outside guidelines when it is appropriate and in the best interest of patients.’

Commissioning leads agreed NICE would have to take the wider financial implications of its recommendations into account if guidelines were to become more rigid.

Dr Steve Kell, co-chair of NHS Clinical Commissioners, said: ‘NICE guidance plays an important role in quality improvement for CCGs. However it is important that NICE take account of financial pressures in the wider system, and move beyond advising in isolation on disease specific areas.   

‘Mandatory NICE Guidance would have a significant cost implication for the NHS and politicians considering this must first ensure the additional funding for this was available.  It would certainly not be covered by any spending commitments made so far.’

A NICE spokesperson said: ‘Public sector organisations do not comment on party manifestos’.

Related images

  • Andy Burnham - online

Readers' comments (26)

  • Dr hypothyroid here again!

    Thank you Peter, I have come to the same conclusion and, yes, my concern is for non medical patients and people who actually have something wrong with them.

    I am also concerned for the doctors and practice team as they have got so utterly bogged down in defensive rules that they are creating much more work for themselves and I assume this has a knock on effect on their ability to spend time with people who actually need it.

    Lastly I am concerned that the ability to have a rational conversation with a patient and negotiate how to move forward has been completely overtaken by the rules.

    I presume that both the doctors and the staff are scared... Of criticism for not following the rules, of losing income, of not achieving " targets" and of being negatively compared with other practices.

    Making NICE compulsory ( and, I am sorry but if the commissioners have to show they are providing all NICE recommended treatments you can bet your bottom dollar that GPs will be monitored through HSCIC) and the monitoring associated with this makes it less likely that patients' preferences and rational choices will be tolerated.

    Incidentally, I mean tolerated..... The very nice receptionist made it clear that she did not have the authority to be flexible.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Vinci Ho

    Don't try to be politically correct and 'politicise' NICE. NICE is an extraordinary organisation with extraordinary recommendations time to time. You think you can control NICE? It can backfire , mate! Cancer drugs funding is a good example of a mess. Don't forget drug companies are always breathing behind its neck all the time. By the way , I am not going to give your party my vote even though you personally have done a lot for Hilsborough inquiry for LFC 96.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • At this rate GPs will be replaced by computers all programmed to NICE, QOF etc etc. To all those who are quitting for Canada and Australia, I hope you are joining a resilient profession and that the contagion will not spread.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • i have lost count of the damage done by tertiary centres adhering to guidelines and placing patients with multimordity on complex drug regimes that cause renal failure, gi bleeds, hypoglycemia, confusion hypotension falls fractures & death. You apply each guideline to an elderly drinking smoker and they'll all be dead by xmas. i would NOT put my name to this tickbox medicine.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • NICE: Nincompoops In Control (of) Everything
    Recipe for disaster here we come - and something else to blame GPs for.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I've been twice in the auditorium when Mr Burnham was outlining his plans. Even Labour faithfuls found it scary. I bet he will never be a Health Secretary. Anyone?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page50 results per page

Have your say