This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Read the latest issue online

CAMHS won't see you now

CQC issues closure notices to two GP practices

Two GP practices face closure from the 1 April after they were issued notices by the Care Quality Commission stating that the regulator intends to refuse their registration.

The CQC told Pulse said there were concerns, either raised by the GMC or by the practices themselves, about the standards at the two practices, but they had been served the notices because they failed to respond to correspondence from the regulator.

A CQC statement said today: ‘To date two “notices proposing to refuse registration” have been issued; the applicants affected have 28 days within which to challenge and appeal against the CQC’s decision.’

The CQC spokesperson added that the CQC hopes to resolve the issues with the two practices before 1 April and that 95% of practices have registered before the 1 April deadline.

The Health and Social Care Act, which comes into effect on 1 April, gives the CQC the power to close practices it has concerns over.

Adrian Hughes, head of registration at the CQC, said: ‘We are delighted with how well GP registration is going; a great deal of work and consultation went into designing a registration process which is as user friendly as possible, and it is good to see this has paid off.’

How has your registration with the CQC gone? Click here to let us know.

Readers' comments (34)

  • We are a modern surgery, built 25 years ago "state of the art" at the time - we have been assessed by Infection Control - and to be CQC compliant are currently having a 300K refit. Just what we need as they tell us that our PMS funding is due to be cut and QOF will make income drop yet further. The refurbishment firm are very happy though.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • we have just been told by CQC we are compliant, not been inspected yet so just a paper exercise, BUT my understanding is that you need to do a risk assessment, and if the risk is appropriate you don't need to change things. so carpet in waiting room, as long as you can show an appropriate cleaning regimen and a policy for boldily fluid spills shoudl be ok. ditto toys as long a an appropriate cleaning and replaceent policy......, engage common sense, it is not up to the PCT but CQC and like lots of things they are being blamed for lots which is not them.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I have no intell other than the article above - but it reads as if the practices just haven't responded to the process of registration, rather than any specific issues identified at the practices themselves. That may well reflect problems at the practice. But has anyone actually been inspected yet?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Our practices registration went off the same day I informed the PCT that I have decided to take early retirement.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Comment from the CQC - The CQC does not require any well run and maintained surgery to rip up their carpets, get rid of soft furnishings, rip up skirting boards or do £1,000's of infection control work to their surgeries, this is a myth and one we have been trying very hard to stamp down on.

    If you do undertake any minor surgery then clearly the area where that is performed will need to be clean and infection free and proper safeguards and risk assessments will to take place in that area, otherwise the CQC will not be looking for anything else other than your surgery is well maintained and you do basics to keep things clean.

    Other question around registration can be found here:

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I agree GP surgeries are a business and should maintain a good standard.

    However the standard hasn't been very clear, and in any case only recently set. As per any business, such changes done quickly will have cost implications and the level of service it provides. The surgery may have no choice but to offer the minial required service as set out in the contract.. Will the patients be happy to see fewer receptionists/GPs/Nurses in their surgeries to accommodate the loss? Or perhaps continual change of staff to employ those on minimal wage? Perhaps partners should seek out cheaper salaried GP from poorer European countries who may be fully qualified to work but has little knowledge of the local culture or language? If we are talking about the "business" in it's pure consumer form, that is what should happen to make "business" sense.

    I hope it wont happen though - I like being a GP and occassionary I'd like to think I might have done a good job and made a difference for my patients, rather than ticking boxes or being a businessman.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Box ticking over patient care anyone? Where are the patients going to go? Do other practices have capacity/want them? The culture of box ticking is all pervasive and increasingly pernicious. Having said which we have also had problems with certain PCT staff spouting nonsense re CQC requirements. They were not too pleased when those of us who had been to CQC info days pointed out that what they were saying completely contradicted CQC information.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • i believe cqc requirements for no overflows in the sinks and non fireproof doors in my 200 yr old building will force its closure!!!.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Another possible sanction against the DOH which has
    gone west it would seem. Even less support than last
    year's "strike"

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • There is a lot of concern about CQC registration especially around premises.
    When they visit they will focus on whether patient safety is compromised and are well aware from the pilots they carried out last year that a lot of primary care is still delivered from old buildings. They do not expect
    state of the art buildings. What they do expect is that practices are aware of any risks and have done something about them.
    They are more than willing to answer any queries and run online Q&A sessions where you can submit your query in advance.
    As long as you can demonstrate that you are meeting the standards (and most well run practices will be able to do so) and can provide the evidence there is no need to worry.
    They will spend more time talking to patients and staff on a visit than looking at documentation so ensure the staff are prepared!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page50 results per page

Have your say