This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

pul jul aug2020 cover 80x101px
Read the latest issue online

Independents' Day

GMC to continue to fund support service for doctors under investigation

The GMC will continue to fund a support service for doctors undergoing fitness-to-practise investigations run by the BMA for at least another a year after a pilot found users of the initiative ‘derived real benefits.’  

The service - run by the BMA’s Doctors for Doctors unit - was set up in 2012 and offers doctors two days of face-to-face support at a fitness-to-practise hearing, and also six hours telephone support throughout an investigation.

After the pilot ended last month, a report by the GMC - Implementing the Doctor Support Service – recommended that the service should be continued, but also suggested that it strives to deliver an ‘enhanced level of service’ for doctors.

The move to continue the service throughout 2015 comes as the GMC recently announced it will introduce ‘emotional resilience’ training and an additonal national support service for doctors after an internal review found that 28 doctors committed suicide while under investigation by the regulator.

Last week, the regulator’s chair Professor Terence Stephenson told a House of Commons health committee hearing that doctors should expect to face a GMC investigation during their career as an ‘occupational hazard’ and build up resilience to deal with it similar to soldiers in Afghanistan.

The BMA’s service does not offer medical or legal advice but does provide the doctor under investigation with someone who understands the process but is not connected to the investigation.

The GMC report states: ‘From the feedback it is clear that doctors who have used the service have derived real benefit from it. Those doctors who accessed the service generally agreed that the service was easy to access and use, that the allocated support time was sufficient and that they valued the fact that the supporters themselves were doctors and that there was continuity of access to one supporter throughout the process.

‘Given the overall positive feedback about the service and the conclusions of the evaluation, we suggest that this provides a strong rationale to continue to provide an independent emotional support service for doctors who have an open investigation.’

Chief executive of the GMC Niall Dickson told Pulse: ‘We know that being under GMC investigation can be incredibly stressful. While we have a duty to look at concerns that are raised with us, we also have a duty of care to doctors under investigation. That is why we have been looking at ways to reduce the stress of our procedures, while never losing our focus on protecting patients.

‘There is more to do and we will continue to look at ways to improve our procedures, not least to reduce the time they take. The Doctor Support Service is an important part of that process and it is encouraging that the feedback from doctors who used it has been so positive. Following a successful pilot, we will now be rolling out this service to ensure that more doctors can access confidential and emotional support.’

GPC deputy chair Dr Richard Vautrey welcomed the move to extend the doctor support service.

Dr Vautrey added: ‘Providing support to doctors in these very difficult and immensely stressful situations is vital and it’s heartening to see the positive comments about the help the BMA service has provided in the pilot and the recommendation to both continue with this and to extend it.’ 

Related images

  • GMC plaque  Ralph Hodgson - online

Readers' comments (9)

  • GMC tells Drs to pull themselves together, can we do it for our patients without being reported to the GMC

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • This is way past some "lip service" support whilst a doctor loses their house whilst under investigation for 18 months then gets cleared. Proportionality please. Right to a paid legal defence, not discretionary by Medical Defence Organisations. .

    Fragile vulnerable and sick doctors or those minor transgressions or remedial matters can be addressed locally with much more sensitively and positive outcomes. We do not need over-regulating to death.

    I feel like our honour and professionalism as doctors and our high standards of medical ethics don't mean s**t if we allow our regulator to continue as they are.

    Am thoroughly disillusioned. On behalf of our doctor-patient colleagues suffering we have a duty to fix this if the GMC will not respect justice, the law, Human rights and rights of redress.

    This is not a Country I wish live in if this tyranny and oppression sits around the corner for every doctor who may "slip up" or worse, receive a malicious complaint not recognised as such until the damage is done.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Una Coales. Retired NHS GP.

    Well said @00:18 am.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Agreed, well said 0.18

    Please also remember that the GMC are not actually funding this themselves, all doctors are paying for this in their subscriptions. This support should be available, independent of the GMC and their processes, and paid for by the NHS/occ health/ employers.

    More importantly, the process must change so that doctors' health and human rights are respected.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • It will surely need a legal challenge.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • They just don't get it! The GMC cannot be both 'investigator' and decide how and where doctors receive treatment/help. There should be a right of choice should anybody wish to get support rather than be obliged to go somewhere which is not trusted or appropriate.who is making money out of referrals it!?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Whilst it is stressful for any Doctor do the GMC ever consider the practice it affects as well? When investigations go on over 3-5 years it has local impact on staff working as well the doctors investigation.As regulators they are not held accountable for excessive time taken why? The whole investigation process needs better clarity, updates , agreed actions and conclusions so everyone involved is kept informed at the correct time.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • “In 2000 there were 333 hearing days – by 2010 that had risen to 3,493 hearing days….

    This increase in activity has inevitably led to increasing cost. In 2000, the GMC spent just under £15 million on its fitness to practice activities and, in 2010, this has risen to just under £44 million”

    …in 2011 it was £50 million
    …in 2012 it was £49 million
    …in 2013 it was £53 million

    …“GPs to face 8% rise in GMC fees from April”

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • 'It is stressful for the practice as well'
    Thanks for pointing that out to me. I will think of that when I pull another dagger out of my back.
    Get the picture: there is a recruitment crisis! It is about time we rescue and preserve doctors. 500 A&E doctors have gone to Australia because of this toxic management style. Droves of GP's where I live are stroking out, dropping dead or emigrating.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say