This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

pulse june2020 80x101px
Read the latest issue online

GPs go forth

Steve Field's practice rated 'requires improvement' for patient safety

The GP practice where the CQC’s chief inspector of general practice, Professor Steve Field, is a partner has received a rating of ‘requires improvement’ on ensuring services are safe for patients, despite being given a ‘Good’ rating overall.

CQC inspectors said the Bellevue Medical Centre, Birmingham, needed to improve its patient safety after failures to appropriately review patients on high risk medications.

However, the practice was found to be ‘outstanding’ in the ‘responsiveness to people’s needs’ domain, with clinics at a local asylum centre and work with homeless patients highly praised.

The practice is part of Birmingham’s Modality Partnership and the inspection report, published last week, highlights that these partnership changes may have been partly responsible for the safety failings.

Professor Field told Pulse he ‘accepts improvements have been requested’ and that he knows the issues with high risk medicine reviews have ‘already been addressed’.

He added he was particularly pleased that the practice’s work with vulnerable and homeless patients had been recognised.

The inspection comes almost a year after Professor Field told the Daily Mail that the poor care in some practices made him ‘ashamed’ to be a GP, adding that he ‘believe we’ve failed as a profession’.

In the same interview Professor Field was said to be particularly concerned by the fact that 29% of practices were found to be ‘not safe’, including 5% who were found to be ‘inadequate’ on the safety score.

This led to GP leaders calling for his resignation, though his comments were backed by Jeremy Hunt as ‘courageuous’

Bellevue is among the last practices in England to be inspected as the CQC aims to hits its deadline of inspecting and publishing reports for all practices by the end of the year – a deadline that was originally September 2016.

The report states that the practice must take steps to ‘ensure that the systems and processes to address risks associated with high risk medicines are implemented to ensure patients’ safety at all times.’

It states: ‘Although risks to patients who used services were assessed, the systems and processes to address these risks were not always implemented well enough to ensure patients’ safety.

And an audit of anonymised patient records receiving high risk medications highlighted issues, including:

  • Failure to carry out reviews in the last 12 months for ‘105 out of 556 patients’ prescribed a medication for heart failure and high blood pressure. The practice’s subsequent review found 139 patients, though 27 had been seen at another provider, others were due to patients not arranging appointments and in 17 cases due to a ‘form processing failure’.
  • In another case the report states, a medication for treating mood disorders was ‘prescribed for 10 patients and we found that five of these patients had reviews which were overdue’

Aside from the high risk medications issue the report shows the practice is highly regarded amongst patients, with regular input from PPGs and that staff had regular meetings with management, and training.

The areas of outstanding care highlighted include: ‘Care and support provided at a ‘local asylum dispersal centre’, where specialist weekly clinics were provided to build relationships and maintain continuity of care; and work with a faith-based charity ‘distributing meals to homeless people’ and undertaking a project to reduce avoidable deaths due to accidental overdose.

Professor Field said: ‘It is a privilege to continue to see patients as a GP at Bellevue in Birmingham.’

‘It keeps me grounded about the issues of practicing as a GP in a deprived inner-city practice, feeling all of the pressures that GPs are under across the country.’

‘Bellevue has recently merged into the Modality Partnership and is subject to the same scrutiny by CQC as other GP practices. I accept that improvements have been requested and I know they already been addressed.’

 Our comments system is not working at the moment. We’re working to fix this as soon as possible - apologies

Readers' comments (49)

  • Steve. When I had almost exactly the same thing, medication reviews,
    But slightly different as a poorer area, much worse recruitment and funding
    Your organisation put me through hell. Real hell
    I left and the practice is run by locums

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • This comment has been moderated

  • Ha ha ha, ho ho ho hahahhah
    Cough splutter
    Hahahahahahahah, snort
    Ha ha hah hah heh hahaha. Wet pants
    Hahahahahahahah roll on floor on back wriggling arms and legs in air

    Next patient please.......

    'Doctor you look like you have had aa fit'

    Oh it's nothing just seen a boomerang of S**t being caught by the one who threw it

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Interesting point Simon. Sorry to hear about your treatment. It would be useful for PULSE to gather their own data from GPs on their CQC assessments and their outcomes and do a comparison with Professor Field's review. Also look for any common themes in terms of points of concern raised by CQC, geographic area and association with GP recruitment. I am sure there are some good academic GPs such as Trish Greenhalgh who can assess the data and give an objective view on the CQC approach. Any thoughts?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Mr Mephisto

    I love the professional photo image.

    His pose looks like the cover shoot for a Val Doonican album – all he is missing is a pipe and an Aran Sweater.

    Perhaps he has a new album coming out “Professor Steve Field Sings Christmas”.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • This comment has been moderated

  • Mr Mephisto

    I see this article has reached the top of the website "MOST POPULAR" list - "MOST POPULAR" he certainly is not.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • It you want to know the personal longer term impact of CQC inspections on those working in GP and the misery yet to come into your life, just speak to any teacher in an average school.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • So there is a GOD? After the damage they have caused to General Practice it is well deserved.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Caption Competition Entries:

    "Oh sh*t, I really am ashamed now"
    "Is that egg on my face?"
    "Yes, its true - BOTH my organisations require improvement"

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • FIELD DO THE HONOURABLE THING FOR ONCE AND RESIGN, GO.

    YOU MAKE ME FEEL ASHAMED OF OUR LEADERS.

    SHAME ON YOU, FIELD-ONE RULE FOR THE ELITE CLASS AND ANOTHER FOR THE DROSS.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • This comment has been removed by the moderator

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page50 results per page

Have your say