This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

pul jul aug2020 cover 80x101px
Read the latest issue online

Independents' Day

‘The fitness-to-practise process may do more harm than good’

A major study has revealed the damaging effect that complaints have on doctors’ health and the way they treat patients, discovers Joe Davis 

Craking head - suicide - depression - depressed - burnout - online

Being the subject of a patient complaint is probably one of the most traumatic events in any doctor’s working life.

This GP’s reaction is typical: ‘I didn’t sleep for a month. I started to have panic attacks. The effect it had on me and on my family was terrible.’

Now, a shocking new study has revealed the poisonous effect of complaints procedures on the mental health of doctors. The study of 8,000 doctors – the largest ever conducted in the UK – found that a sixth reported severe or moderate depression following a complaint, and many others reported anxiety and even suicide ideation.

The study, from researchers at Imperial College London, comes after a GMC review last year found 28 doctors had died by suicide during fitness-to-practise procedures.

The most worrying finding of this new study was the adverse effect on patient care. Eight in 10 doctors said a recent complaint changed the way they practise, while over one in four (26%) said they suggested invasive procedures against their professional judgment.

The vast majority of doctors showed ‘hedging’ behaviour after a complaint and a third became less committed and ‘worked strictly to their job description’.

The researchers’ conclusion was damning:  ‘Our data also show the vast majority of doctors who took part in the study reported engaging in defensive practice.

‘This included carrying out more tests than necessary, over-referral, overprescribing, avoiding procedures, not accepting high-risk patients and abandoning procedures early.’

They added: ‘These behaviours are not in the interest of patients and may cause harm, while they may also potentially increase the cost of healthcare provision.’

‘More harm than good’

Lead author Professor Tom Bourne, professor of surgery and cancer at Imperial College London, explains the results – published last month in BMJ Open – may only show association and not causation, but they are still of ‘major concern’.

He tells Pulse: ‘The data show that psychological morbidity increases as the “complaints pyramid” is ascended, so it is lowest with informal procedures but much greater when the GMC is involved.

‘Morbidity is lowest in people who have not had a complaint, but have observed one – but highest when a complaint is ongoing.’

 

The researchers concluded that, as the majority of doctors who are reported to the regulator are not found to have a significant case to answer, the fitness-to- practise process ‘may do more overall harm than good in terms of patient care’.

This conclusion is borne out by the experience of those working with doctors who have been the subject of a complaint.

Professor Clare Gerada, former RCGP chair and medical director of the NHS Practitioner Health Programme (PHP) – the support service for sick doctors – says a complaint against a doctor can present a substantial risk factor for depression.

February 2015 issue - complaints box out

She says: ‘When we see someone at PHP who has been referred to the regulator we are very concerned. Even if the person is not depressed at the time, we consider that a referral is a massive risk factor for depression.’

She concurs with the view that this adversely affects patient care: ‘Complaints make doctors act defensively and this effect persists for long time, and makes them over cautious, not just in referring and investigations but in terms of spending longer with consultations.

‘There is a downside of complaints which can, paradoxically, harm patients.’

The study comes at an awkward time for the GMC. The regulator published an independent review in December of the deaths of doctors who had been undergoing a fitness-to-practise investigation between 2005 and 2013. It revealed that, over the eight-year period, 28 doctors had died from suicide while undergoing GMC investigations.

The review recommended several fundamental changes to fitness-to-practise procedures, including ensuring doctors feel they are ‘innocent until proven guilty’, setting up a national support service and teaching ‘emotional resilience’ during medical training.

The review’s recommendations have been accepted in full by the GMC. However, chair Professor Terence Stephenson recently told a parliamentary hearing that complaints were an ‘occupational hazard’ and emotional resilience training – similar to that undertaken by soldiers in Afghanistan – could help.

His comments provoked fury among GPs – with the story on the Pulse website receiving more than 150 comments.

GPC chair Dr Chaand Nagpaul says while GPs do need to be resilient, emotional resilience training is not the solution to the problem.

February 2015 issue - complaints box out

He adds: ‘This is not a war. What we need is to make the environment supportive for GPs. We know that a complaint and, in particular, an investigation into performance, is hugely damaging for GPs, not just in terms of stress but in terms of their ability to continue to provide care.’

Progress

The GMC says it will be looking at what further change is needed. Chief executive Niall Dickson says: ‘We know some doctors who come into our procedures have very serious health concerns, including those who have had ideas of committing suicide.

‘For any doctor, being investigated by the GMC is a stressful experience. Our first duty must be to protect patients but we are determined to handle these cases as sensitively as possible, to ensure the doctors are being supported locally and to reduce the impact of our procedures.

‘We have made some progress but we have more to do.’

February 2015 issue - complaints analysis box out

‘It was pretty nerve-wracking’

I received the letter on Valentine’s Day 2014 from the GMC, saying it had decided to investigate a complaint.

The complaint was over a symptom I did not refer and it had some quite scary wording. Nothing was ever very clear – it was all ‘this could affect your fitness to practise’ and ‘this could lead to your licence being removed’. It was pretty nerve-wracking.

The GMC invites you to comment on the complaint in the initial letter. Having never had anything like it before, I was so shocked when I received it that I wrote back outlining what I thought had happened. Then I was advised by the MDU that on no grounds should I make any comment to the GMC because they immediately send it on to the complainant.

After that, it was just a case of me ringing the GMC to chase up. But the concern was always around the complainant and what they thought. No one ever asked me what I felt.

In my case, the GMC’s final report in June 2014 said no further action should be taken, so there was no panel hearing and the complaint wasn’t upheld.

No GMC support

One of the points on my report was that I shouldn’t assume that this particular symptom was harmless. But doctors assume symptoms like that are harmless every single day – am I now supposed to assume everyone I see is problematic and refer them?

I had no support from the GMC. It would have been nice to have someone to call for pastoral help. Essentially, if the complaint is upheld, you get to put your point across – in court.

But if, as in my case, it never gets to that point, you never get the chance to say anything: you’re just ‘under investigation’.

I now refer more, because while I worry that someone might rap me over the knuckles for referring too many cases to secondary care, I don’t worry that they’re going to strike me off the medical register for doing so.

Name and address supplied.

 

Rate this article  (4.25 average user rating)

Click to rate

  • 1 star out of 5
  • 2 stars out of 5
  • 3 stars out of 5
  • 4 stars out of 5
  • 5 stars out of 5

0 out of 5 stars

Readers' comments (22)

  • Vinci Ho

    Correction
    ....collateral damage can be inflicted ....

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The statistics from the Annual GMC accounts

    Complaints have been increasing:-

    1995…1,503
    1997…2,687
    2000…4,141
    2001…4,219
    2004…4,444
    2005…4,941
    2006…5,087
    2008…5,220
    2009…5,692
    2010…7,022 .....

    But GMC Hearings days have been increasing at 10 times the rate:-

    1995…90
    1997…97
    2000…288
    2001…723
    2004…921
    2005…1,301
    2006…1,754
    2008…2,100
    2009…2,518
    2010…3,493 …..

    Around 50% of interventions by the GMC are on GPs with an annual increase of 20 – 25%.

    With 60,000 GPs on the register and on currents trends and calculations (by the power expansion series), within 15 years, 115% of GPs will have been deemed impaired by the GMC and will have received sanctions from the GMC - such as the imposition of conditions, suspension or erasure.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I put together this brief response to Dr Margaret McCartney's recent very good piece on "resilience"

    I do not want to be a "Robodoc" http://wp.me/p3fTIB-1l1

    Peter J Gordon

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Doctors do not breath air, we breath "protect patient". It is not only doctors who have gone through fitness to practice procedures, most doctors will jst refer cases. In the past, I was all for reduce patient's journey. I used to do various office gynaecology, minor surgery. Call up every possible consultant for advise.

    I have changed, though I hate myself for that. Refer to specialist, do only what my job description is, not what my clinical skills and experience is. Thanks to GMC. I feel less stressed after I changed my practice,

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The whole mantra of RCGP of "uncertainty in general practice, patient advocate, gate keeper and other institutional words" is for the past. Do not go home with uncertainty, spend more time and refer, document pt has made informed decision, side effects explained.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • What a sad state of affairs.it used to be a joy to be a doctor --most of us went into this profession because we wanted to make a difference to people's lives . Now we are hounded and live in fear. Really sad .

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Anonymous at 3:24.
    Nurse at 1:44 has not trivialised anything. she hs described her experience.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • As I doctor who is currently undergoing a GMC investigation, can I say that from personal experience that the three main causes of stress at this juncture are: firstly, you are treated as guilty until proved innocent by all parties involved - including your defence, who suggests that you take no action whatsoever to defend yourself, no matter how ridiculous the accusation made against you. You must sit quietly and do nothing, made to feel like a naughty schoolboy throughout, even if you have done nothing wrong. Given the length of time investigations take, that's a big ask. I am now three months into an investigation and still have yet to find out exactly what the allegation is against me. I am not allowed to know, in case I intimidate any witnesses.

    Secondly, the GMC letters may have improved in their tone, and I have found the investigator in my case to be very pleasant, even courteous, in e-mail and phone exchanges but the promise to 'keep you informed of progress' is frankly non-existent. You will be told nothing until the case is decided.

    Thirdly, the so-called GP Support Scheme is a joke, not fit for purpose. I was told I could have 6 x 20 minute telephone consultations with a counsellor, but that there was a six week waiting list.

    Is it any wonder GPs develop symptoms of anxiety, depression or even contemplate suicide under such circumstances? Doctors under investigation are human beings who have spent their working lives caring for the sick and needy. They deserve more respect, and to be treated like human beings - at least the same level of respect offered to the accuser. They should be notified of the allegation made against them; informed at regular pre-determined intervals of the progress of the investigation and offered immediate counselling to prevent serious post-traumatic stress symptoms and behaviours developing. It isn't rocket science. It's called treating someone as innocent until proven guilty.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Why isn't anything being done about this?

    It's the same time and time and time again....glaring injustice and NOTHING is done.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Voting with your feet is an effective and perhaps only protest.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page50 results per page

Have your say