This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

pul jul aug2020 cover 80x101px
Read the latest issue online

Independents' Day

GMC spends £35k a year on private health screenings for employees

Exclusive The GMC racked up a bill of tens of thousands last year for private health screenings offered as an employee perk, Pulse has learned.

The regulator said the £182.50-a-go health screens, provided by BMI Healthcare, were intended to 'support staff in their health and wellbeing'.

The screenings, which include cardiovascular and diabetes tests - some of which are not recommended by the NHS - result in a personalised medical report and a lifestyle consultation.

They form part of a wider benefits package that the GMC offers as part of a bid to 'attract and retain staff'. But GP leaders said doctors would be 'appalled' at the use of their mandatory regulation fees.

Pulse understands that the doctors' regulator has been offering the private screenings, available to staff every 1-3 years depending on their age, for several years.

In 2017, the GMC spent £34,864 on them.

It comes as the GMC launched a review into its offer of private health insurance to staff in 2012, as it sought ‘efficiency gains' that would allow it to offer cuts to fees.

This followed Pulse's revelation that the regulator had racked up an annual spend of £280,000 on the staff perk.

But, although the news caused an outcry among GPs at the time, the scheme was still in place a year later.

Commenting on the private screenings, a GMC spokesperson said: ‘Like many organisations, we offer a range of competitive benefits to attract and retain staff...

‘This is wholly elective and not every staff member will apply. And, as with all our staff benefits, this is reviewed regularly.'

But BMA GP Committee regulation lead Dr Robert Morley said: ‘I expect most doctors will be absolutely appalled that part of their GMC subscriptions are being used for this purpose - bearing in mind the lack of evidence base for most private health screening, the inappropriate additional work it creates for NHS GPs and the currently low standing of GMC in the eyes of the profession.’

A Pulse investigation last year showed that GPs were bearing the brunt of an increase in private companies offering ‘unnecessary’ health screening tests such as clinically unsupported CT scans.

Nearly half of GPs surveyed by Pulse said their workload had risen as a result of patients needlessly concerned by results.

Public Health England uploaded a blog last week asking patients to see their GP if they were displaying worrying symptoms, rather than paying for private screenings that can cause undue worry.

But the GMC spokesperson said: ‘Everyone should have their health checked regularly and these screenings should not create undue concern for patients.’

Meanwhile, a petition calling for the GMC to become funded by taxpayers rather than through annual fees from doctors - launched in light of the regulator's treatment of struck-off junior doctor Hadiza Bawa-Garba - has fetched 24,000 signatures.

What the GMC-funded employee health screen includes


  • Medical and lifestyle questionnaire
  • Dietary assessment
  • BMI Guide to healthy living
  • Personalised medical report and recommendations
  • Lifestyle consultation with nurse


  • Blood pressure
  • Body composition (height, weight, hip to waist, BMI and body fat percentage)

Blood tests

  • Lipid profile
  • Check for Diabetes including HbA1c

Other investigations

  • Cardiovascular risk score
  • Urine analysis (3 tests for diabetes infection and kidney function)
  • Vision and hearing

Female-specific tests

  • Breast cancer awareness

Male-specific tests

  • Testicular cancer awareness

Source: BMI Healthcare

Readers' comments (30)

  • Is this not a little two face surely they should not have this and be exposed to the services the NHS supplies then as patient advocates they can lobby to improve those service rather than use health check of negligble benefits provided by a privateer.The GMC is not fit for purpose and need urgent reform.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Dear All,
    The highest peak of standards for medical professionalism in the UK, the body that oversees it all, pursues completely rubbish medicine. Routine employee health checks - what's the evidence base for this?
    Explains a lot.
    PauL C

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • What a waste of our GMC fees.... but I am appalled at our colleagues lack of enthusiasm in signing petition for GMC to be funded by tax payer and not GP. Just 24000 signature in last 4 + weeks. Shame on us . Clearly we deserve no better if we are so lethargic/despondent.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Where do we access the petition please...?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Pradeep, possibly because of fear of losing anonymity.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • This comment has been removed by the moderator

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I wonder what the GMC employees do with their private health screening reports? See their GP for interpretation?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • End of the line?

    How much do we pay for their GOLD PLATED PENSIONS ASWELL??

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • This comment has been moderated

  • Clearly those at the GMC are much more important than the rest of us that work at the coal face of NHS healthcare!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Vinci Ho

    : ‘Like many organisations, we offer a range of competitive benefits to attract and retain staff...

    So GMC fully appreciate the importance of attracting and retaining staff . But it ‘prosecuted’ our colleagues, it never considered the failure of the system of recruiting and retaining resources(manpower , expertise, money and hence time). And we paid for its existence and obviously these expenditures.
    How twisted are we, ladies and gentlemen?
    As I always say , not different from S&M.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page50 results per page

Have your say