This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

pulse june2020 80x101px
Read the latest issue online

GPs go forth

Practices rated ‘inadequate’ by CQC have underlying recruitment problems

Exclusive GP practices given poor CQC ratings have underlying problems with recruiting GPs and staff, including a practice where on occasions one GP was forced to cater for over 8,000 patients.

Six of the seven GP practices to have been rated ‘inadequate’ under the new Ofsted-style CQC inspection regime had problems with GP recruitment, high staff turnover and trouble recruiting nurses because they either could not find or not afford them.

Staff at the seventh were being stretched across two sites after taking over another practice, a Pulse analysis of their CQC reports have shown.

GPC said these underlying isses are as likely to reflect the lack of investment in these practices as they are overall quality.

It comes as GP recruitment is facing a crisis with GP leaders warning that the lack of new doctors entering the profession is threatening patient care. Last week, the RCGP warned some areas of England need more than a 50% boost to GP numbers to be able to meet demand over the next five years.

Examples of pressures described in the CQC reports includes:

  • Priory Avenue Surgery in Berkshire had doctor shortages so bad that on occasions only one GP was forced to cater to 8,050 patients. The practice had recently been hit by a series of resignations, long-term sick leave and trouble recruiting administrative staff.
  • Woodside Group Practice in south east London was left with just one practice nurse for a list of 13,000 patients to provide core and enhanced services after failing to recruit replacements for departing nurses as well as GPs.
  • Dr Srinivas Dharmana’s surgery in Liverpool saw patients speaking highly of the lead GP but they had been away from clinical practice for around a year at the time of inspection and another ‘key staff member’ was also on a long-term absence.
  • Dr Wayne Sefton Davis’ practice in Manchester, the lead GP had been absent for several months and financial pressures had left it unable to employ a practice nurse.
  • Dr Sunil Srivastava’s practice in Leeds had a lack of administration staff which led to difficulties for patients getting appointment and gaps in the practice’s audit trail
  • The CQC criticised Dr Michael Florin’s surgery in Cheshire because staff holidays and sickness had prevented practice meetings from taking place and minutes from being kept.

There were also direct references to low staff morale in the CQC reports for three of the seven practices. All seven were hit with complaints over a lack of evidence and appropriate paper trails.

Although there were also other reasons behind the CQC’s judgement on the practices, the GPC warned that rating them ‘inadequate’ failed to take into account underlying factors such as funding and trouble recruiting.

The report summary for Priory Avenue Surgery, which the CQC has now placed in ‘special measures’, said: ‘The practice was going through a significant staffing crisis and there had been severe staff disruption in recent months. The practice was working closely with the NHS England area team to ensure they took immediate corrective action, which would enable them to fulfil their basic functions safely. The North and West Reading Clinical Commissioning Group were also monitoring the concerns and issues within the practice.’

Meanwhile the CQC wrote about Woodside Group Practice: ‘There was a high turnover of clinical staff with two GPs and practice nurses having left in the last few months. The practice had been unable to fiund suitable replacements.’

Dr Robert Morley, GPC contracts and regulations lead and a GP in Birmingham, said: ‘I would say these are issues which are as likely, if not more likely, to reflect the lack of investment in, lack of support for and the deliberately destructive policies towards general practice by politicians, PCTs and NHS England over the last decade as they are to reflect the quality of care that practices strive to provide.

‘It would be interesting to look at judgements made by CQC in the context of the funding and working conditions of these practices compared to those that CQC has been less critical of, but CQC judgements and ratings appear devoid of such context.’

GPC deputy chair Dr Richard Vautrey said: ‘This is yet another sign of the huge pressure practices are under and the impact this is having on GPs’ health. Both CQC and NHS England have to work to address these issues and support practices rather than condemning them.’

Related images

  • CQC - clipboard - file - paperwork - online

Readers' comments (20)

  • Having recently seen a published list of practice funding - it might be useful to compare their funding per patient to the averages nationally and in their area.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • dog excrement Sherlock?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • recruitment poblems amongst General practitioners will remain as long as NHS uses GMC MPTS as its lawyers to bully GPs to accept NHS non evidence based medicine approach.Of late NICE guidelines have stoped allowing sulphonyureas as 2nd line Antidiabetics,replacing them ironically with on demand SUs repaglinide.Dapaglizone an SGLPT2 inhibitirhas been shown to combat metabolic sideffects and its tremendous costs of treatment of weight and hypoglycaemia.
    As long as GMC MPTS unquestioningly supports NHS's negative approach to treatment of the public ,the public will suffer the consequences and Recruitment crisis wil not be addressed.
    GPs have been trained to put patients first before costs

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Respectfully this has nothing to do with diabetes or the MPTS.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Vinci Ho

    CQC needs to be honest with their findings and let the public know. Identifying funding shortage and providing help(if NHSE is honest as well!) is far more essential than fault findings in many cases. Hence , funding issues put patients at risk , this goes back to the duties of CQC and NHSE.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • This Pulse slant suggests this CQC exercise is useful for highlighting the need for investment, well played.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Anonymous | NHS Manager | 19 February 2015 3:37pm

    no its suggesting that the reason these practices are failing, is due to factors outside of the control of the practice itself.

    Its like blaming and shaming a kid with cerebral palsy that he's stupid.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • This comment has been moderated.

  • If they didn't have problems with recruitment before, they sure will now.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • the government wants to get rid of gps and nurses and replace them with volunteers

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The CQC takes no interest in practice funding issues. They measure everyone with the same yardstick. This is just another version of good old fashioned name-and-shame NHS bullying. All the scrutiny these practices are under, in the name of cant and 'transparency' just further compounds low morale and sense of hopelessness. And as MPIG is eroded, PMS premiums removed, and there are less GPs and practice nurses joining the profession than leaving, it will get worse.

    Then the publicly funded Primary Care will be deemed as failing/poor quality, and privatised. That's the government's agenda.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page

Have your say