Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Quality premium payments will not be used as GP 'bonus'

Exclusive: CCGs will not be able to hand quality premium payments to member practices as a ‘bonus’ and will have to ensure it is used to develop programmes that directly benefit patients, says the Government’s commissioning tsar.

Dame Barbara Hakin, national director of commissioning development at the NHS Commissioning Board, said new regulations will require CCGs to use the premium to improve patient outcomes rather than handing it direct to practices.

This could include incentivising practices - or other providers, such as community services - to meet improvement targets, among other options.

The quality premium will be paid to CCGs that achieve targets set by the Board, including reducing avoidable emergency admissions, rolling out the friends and family test, reducing incidence of healthcare associated infections and reducing potential years of lives lost through amenable mortality.

Dame Barbara had suggested in August last year that CCGs could hand the quality premium payments directly to GP practices, or with ‘certain caveats’.

Speaking to Pulse last week, Dame Hakin said the Board had decided to recommend that the regulations surrounding the quality premium that will be laid before Parliament before April should block CCGs from simply handing the quality premium to practices.

She said: ‘The final definition of the regulations will be put before Parliament. But we are recommending that the quality premium can only be used to improve services for patients.

‘I don’t believe [offering bonuses to GPs in terms of direct payments] would fit that definition. We have been clear that the recommendation is that the money must be used directly to benefit patients.’

If the Board’s recommendations are approved by Parliament, CCGs will be able to develop improvement programmes from the premium payments that include financial incentives paid to practices who meet improvement targets in a specific area, such as diabetes.

A spokesperson for the NHS Commissioning Board added: “The Department of Health is due to introduce regulations shortly setting out how CCGs can use quality premium payments.

‘We anticipate that CCGs will have to be able to show that they are using quality premium payments to improve quality of care and health outcomes in their local communities. CCGs would not, therefore, be able to simply distribute the payment among member practices as a bonus for achieving the quality premium.

‘This would mean that CCGs can use quality premium payments to improve services and outcomes across hospital, community and primary care. They would be free to set their own priorities, and to design improvement programmes which match their communities’ unique needs, whether through commissioning new services or through setting up their own local incentive schemes.’

Dr Andrew Mimnagh, chair of Sefton LMC, said: ‘Some of the correspondence has suggested that [practices would get direct payments]. The GPC were concerned that anything seen as direct payments to practices for reductions in activities without clinical justification.

‘I’d be gratified if [Dame Barbara] had clarified that area and that the operation of any quality premium would be based on true measures of quality.

‘Certainly there would need to be some mechanism for recognising any extra workload involved in commissioning-type activities but it is an evolving situation.’

GPC chair Dr Richard Vautrey said the GPC still had concerns around the quality premium. He said: ‘The fundamental problem remains that the [CCG] won’t get the quality premium money if they don’t also achieve financial balance. That’s where the potential problems will come.’

How the quality premium will work

  • CCGs will be given the payments – likely to be around £5 per patient – for meeting certain targets.
  • The payments will be broken down into: 25% for reducing or maintaining a 0% change in unnecessary emergency admissions;  12.5% for meeting targets around reducing healthcare associated infections; 12.5% for rolling out the the friends and family test;    12.5% for reducing amenable mortality rates by at least 3.2%
  • CCGs will not receive the payments if they do not achieve financial balance. Payments will be reduced if they fail to meet targets set out in the NHS Constitution, including those related to waiting times
  • CCGs must spend money received on improving patient outcomes. This could include improvement programmes that incorporate targeted incentive schemes for GPs, among other options

Readers' comments (5)

  • If I approached someone and said that I could make them live longer, not go to hospital and not get infections if they do go to hospital for a single crisp fiver, they would label me a "nut case" and likely call the Police yet this is the Government's expectation.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Ha Ha! And don't forget, you don't earn your fiver until they recommend you to their friends and family as well. This isn't a handout you know ...

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I am cynical enough to believe that once someone starts telling me something isn't what it look like before I've even thought about it, that usually means that what it looks like is exactly what it is!
    Methinks they do protest too much!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I am puzzled by the change in the goal post by CCG/Govt.
    This QP payments are part of our income - a slice taken from the same cake.
    It appears that the profesion needs to challenge this and not allow this govt to bully us! It is time to unite.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Er...I think the time to unite passed some time ago.

    The Health and Social Care Act should have been stopped and it's a bit late now. It's sad but true that the profession, and in particular it's leadership, failed when it should have acted.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say