This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Read the latest issue online

GPs buried under trusts' workload dump

Locum GPs may still face ‘unfair’ pension rules despite new proposals

Locum GPs may still be subject to ‘unfair’ pension rules despite the Government's overhaul of the NHS Pension Scheme, experts have warned.

This week the Department for Health and Social Care (DHSC) announced proposals to reform NHS Pensions and allow greater flexibility on contributions and a review by the Treasury into the tapered annual allowance.

But it is unclear how, and if, these proposals will affect automatic annualisation for locum GPs and will allow them to choose their own pensions contributions.

Under new rules, due to the 'annualisation' of locums' pay, locums will almost certainy have to pay 14.5% in contributions (see box, below).  

Previously, locums were allowed to stop working for up to three months before they were subject to annualisation. But in March this year the Government announced it would be removing the three-month rule to bring it in line with salaried GPs.

The BMA warned the change, introduced in April 2019, would discriminate against GP locums, particularly those with legally protected characteristics (ethnic minorities, women, those with disabilities) who are less likely to be in the scheme for a full year.

When asked by Pulse whether the new pension proposal would address locum annualisation the DHSC said the consultation would ‘focus on pension flexibility rather than GP locum pension contribution rules’ which was a ‘separate issue’.

Dr Ben Molyneux, BMA sessional GP Committee chair, said the flexibilities would only offer short-term relief for locums because the proposals did not address wider issues with the pension scheme.

He said: ’For locums, the biggest problem lies in annualisation, whereby some GPs are forced to make contributions based on annualised earnings, rather than actual income for hours worked. This creates the incredibly unfair situation where some locums are paying higher contribution rates for no additional pension benefit and we will continue to push for change in this area.’

Andrew Pow, board member of the Association of Independent Specialist Medical Accountants, said: ‘All the Government has said so far is that they are going to scrap the consultation they set out two months ago and issue consultation number two. There is a complete lack of detail. I don’t know what they are going to be looking at.’

Dr Richard Fieldhouse, chair of the National Association of Sessional GPs, shared his frustration and said he was unclear how the consultation would impact sessional GPs.

‘We get the roughest, rawest deal already. Annualisation is automatic if we take a day off. It literally could not get any worse.’

The new consultation, which falls under the NHS Long Term Plan, is expected to be published in the next few weeks. 

Example: How does annualisation work?

  • A locum provides holiday cover for a local practice.They work four days a week through the school holidays, each day being paid £500.
  • Their actual annual income is £26,000. However, to estimate how what percentage of their salary a locum has to contribute to pensions, the new rules only consider the days the GP actually worked and 'annualise' that. Ie, they are considered to earn £500 every day of the year. 
  • Their annualised income is £182,500. As a result of their higher projected earnings, instead of paying 7.1% of their income into the NHS Pension scheme, they will pay a higher rate of 14.5%, which amounts to £3,770 instead of £1,846.

(Based on examples given by Dr Nicola Hambridge, Leeds LMC chair, at the 2019 LMCs Conference in Belfast)

Readers' comments (9)

  • not encouraging young doctors to stay in the UK as it is. shameful.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • THIS MIGHT BE THE ONLY INCENTIVE TO BEING A NON-LOCUM, SINCE THEIR PAY HAS INCREASED (WITH FREE INDEMNITY) AND MARKET FORCES HAVE DRIVEN UP PAY AS WELL.

    WITH THE LACK OF RESPONSIBILITY AND THE LUXURY OF BEING ABLE TO TELL PATIENTS "RE-BOOK WITH YOUR OWN GP" FOR ANYTHING CHALLENGING, THERE ARE NO NEGATIVES FOR LOCUMS UNTIL NOW......

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • DrRubbishBin

    Last Man Standing | GP Partner/Principal09 Aug 2019 6:12pm
    WHY DO YOU TYPE IN CAPITAL LETTERS? IT READS LIKE YOU ARE SHOUTING

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Annualisation means I stick to my regular GP sessions and refuse any extra work, no matter how stretched my practice is.

    Unintended consequences. Let the Government reap what it has sown.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Thanks Pulse for confirming it! The complicated smoke and mirrors again!
    They count the locum as working ALL 7 days of the week and make the GP pay to work. "Annualised" "Tapering" "Removing tax relief", "Penalised on pension growth that nobody knows until 2 years later" "Taxing and giving a fine on the unknown pension growth if you do guessed it wrong" etc. All work to confuse people and just look at you bank account after tax you will realise it is not worth it. There is an article in GP online about how doctors get poorer by working as the money they earn after tax is not sufficient to pay the additional pension tax. Forget waiting times.
    Nobody will be stupid enough to pay to work. Just let it build. Any doctor that come will leave once they realize the workings of this dishonest system.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Private limited company anyone?none of this applies with a private pension!😀
    Or better still,explore going off shore?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • put all money in SIPP or buy a property from company

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • does that mean you lose tax deductibility of pension contributions as well as you are falsely judged to be over the threshold of tapered earnings of 150k

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I think everyone should pay the same percentage of pension TBH not sure whey lower rate if earn less

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say