This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Analysis: How immunisations are set to change

This year, GPs face yet more changes to a crowded schedule of vaccinations. Will they be able to cope? Michael Woodhead investigates

GP-based vaccination programmes have historically been a huge public health success in preventing disease. But cracks are beginning to show.

After a year in which vaccine shortages, infectious disease outbreaks, and major changes to the oversight of public health have all put pressure on the system, GPs could be forgiven for hoping for a few months of stability.

But they would be disappointed. There will be two new immmunisations introduced this year – rotavirus in the infant schedule and herpes zoster for the elderly – while the vaccination of children against flu will begin possibly as early as next year.

Beyond that, there are a number of major vaccination programmes on the horizon that could see GP practices involved.

They all offer more opportunities to prevent important diseases – but with an already crowded vaccination programme, will practices be able to cope?

Outbreaks

Last year saw GPs battling on several fronts, with flu vaccines being recalled, a surge in whooping cough cases and a measles outbreak in north-west England.

The emergency whooping cough campaign – introduced in October to combat a fourfold increase in pertussis infection rates compared with the previous year – had an immediate impact.

GPs helped achieve uptake rates of 40%, even though practices in some areas were hampered by their removal from antenatal care and a lack of support from midwives, who said they didn’t have the capacity or training to provide the vaccine.

There were problems with the flu vaccination campaign, with the recall of batches of flu vaccine from manufacturer Crucell in the autumn leaving practices short of supplies at the beginning of the flu season. This led to criticism that the DH had not stockpiled any emergency supplies.

New jabs

This year sees the continuation of the whooping cough programme in pregnant women, and some major changes to the immunisation programme delivered by GPs.

Rotavirus vaccination will be added to the infant schedule from September 2013 for babies aged under four months, to reduce cases of gastroenteritis. Immunisation against herpes zoster in patients aged 70–79 years will also be introduced this year, although exactly when has yet to be finalised because of uncertainty about vaccine stocks.

The immunisation schedule for meningococcal disease is also likely to change substantially in the near future, with the first vaccine for the B strain licensed by European authorities last month and changes to the timing of the vaccine that protects against meningitis C.

Infants currently receive two doses of meningitis C vaccine at three and four months, and a booster at 12 months, but this booster is now to be moved to the teenage years, in a schools-based programme that will lighten the load for GPs.

Influenza is another area where GPs will see major changes. The DH plans to roll out annual flu vaccination for all children from the age of two to 17 years in 2014 at the earliest.

The nasal vaccine is likely to be delivered through a school nurse-based programme for those aged five upwards, while GPs would be expected to vaccinate the pre-school-age groups.

However, a shortage of school nurses could see GPs mopping up work in the older age group too.

A crowded schedule

The raft of changes has led the GPC to warn that any future changes will need to be worked out very carefully with the profession in advance.

Dr Bill Beeby, who chairs the GPC’s clinical and prescribing subcommittee, believes GPs will be able to manage the imminent changes, but warns the current schedule is already ‘about as crowded as it’s possible to be’.

He says: ‘It has been changed several times. So any new changes need to be talked over with the GPC, to discuss
how we are going to introduce new vaccines.

‘There are always going to be complex [immunisation] routines and if they do introduce new vaccines, such as rotavirus, then it is going to be helpful if they introduce them at points when we are already doing something. 

‘It’s not too difficult to design a schedule that doesn’t involve multiple visits.’

Dr Beeby also warns that while parents with young children usually follow GPs’ vaccination advice, they may struggle if repeated visits are required.

He says: ‘If the schedule becomes too complicated, there’s a risk that parents just won’t be able to keep up with it. The immunisation schedule needs to be kept sensible so that it is easy for parents to make sure their children become fully immunised.’

NHS reforms

The great unknown over the next few years is how national immunisation programmes are going to fare after the reorganisation of the NHS, with responsibility for overseeing vaccinations transferring from the Department of Health and PCTs to Public Health England and CCGs.

Dr John Middleton, vice-president of the UK Faculty of Public Health, warns the changes will make the immunisation system much more fragmented.

‘This is going to make it extremely hard to bring in new programmes,’ he says. ‘In fact, it’s going to be difficult enough to keep up levels with the existing immunisations that we have already got.’

But Dr Beeby is more optimistic, saying: ‘There shouldn’t be any difficulty with any of the things as we transfer over.

‘PCTs don’t have any direct role in the day-to-day running of the vaccination programme, and I don’t think [the transition] will interfere at all with vaccine giving by GPs.’

 

 

Readers' comments (8)

  • Dont be so sure the people who consult you are as satisfied with the lack of committment .a major discontent is the lack of continuity and the never ending small errors and changes made by different locums who dont know people as individuals.not all are bothered but a sizeable number are sad that they dont get to know a GP as a person either

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I think it's good to have insight into what suits you best in your career.

    Many of us just know how to be a GP partner, and that's all! It takes so much to be a GP and get to know your patients and get old along them. That's nice, but not ideal for everyone.

    People like Libby enjoy varierty and more balance in work life interface. They would probably put their potentials into practice in various areas and I admire people who are brave enough to admit GP principal role as it is now, with all the pressures and challenges, is not for them.

    After all, people are different and it's good to find out what type of work makes you the optimal 'serving machine' in this world, keeping you healthy and productive at the same time! We should not misuse the concept of 'continuity' which is desirable but not always essential; we are not there to make people 'happy', just to help maintain their help.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I meant health!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • As stated Babak.not everybody needs and many certainly dont want ,a relationship with a GP but those who do expect and need this continuity lament the way things are going.lets all have a right state our views without getting needlessly defensive...Libby is perfectly entitled to run her own life as she wishes

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Interesting slip Babak, Thing is 'help' 'health' and 'happiness' are inextricably linked at times!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Interesting slip Babak, Thing is 'help' 'health' and 'happiness' are inextricably linked at times!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • It's about finding the right working style for you - one is not better than another. We're all different and we're fortunate to be in a profession that allows us many choices. You can contact me through my website if you're interested in talking further about this:
    www.libbyhodges.com

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I wonder how many GPs give child imms?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say