This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

pulse june2020 80x101px
Read the latest issue online

GPs go forth

Sometimes, doctor does know best

Dr David Turner

Dr david turner duo 3x2

Any GPs out there of a particular nervous disposition may wish to stop reading now, as what I am about to say may offend.

We sometimes need to be totally doctor-centred and tell patients what is best for them.

A recent example of why this is sometimes the case is the shocking news that measles is on the rise again. There were 828 confirmed cases this year in the UK up to 13 August, and 37 deaths from the disease across Europe.

For those young GPs out there who may have still been at school at the time, this problem started in 1998 because of the actions of the disgraced and discredited doctor, Andrew Wakefield. He published a now retracted paper in The Lancet, which claimed to link MMR vaccine to autism and colitis.

None of us has the time in a ten-minute consultation to begin to debunk the myths about vaccination

We dissected this paper at the time it was published in my GP VTS group and even then we considered it to be dangerous nonsense. Sadly we were proven correct.

However, a large sector of the public it would seem, prefer to believe anecdote, hearsay and the ramblings of self-promoting zealots rather than boring old statistics. For example the stale old fact that the serious complication rate with MMR vaccination is less than one in a million, a lower risk than dying in an aeroplane crash. I wonder how many people who refuse the MMR on behalf of their child will be jetting off on holiday somewhere this summer?

None of us has the time in a ten-minute consultation to begin to debunk the myths about vaccination that sectors of the population have been brainwashed with by social media and poor journalism, so I would propose when it comes to MMR, we just have to become militant and tell parents that sorry but we do know what is best for your child and that is to be vaccinated against potentially fatal diseases, with vaccines that have been extensively used and have an excellent safety record.

I say this because most decisions in healthcare affect only the individual making them, but vaccination does not. For MMR to be effective we need 95% herd immunity and this dropped to 80% in the UK in 2003.

So no, vaccination is ‘not just about you’, it is about us all. Some European countries will not allow children to enter the state education system without evidence of vaccination. I can see no reason why this would not be a reasonable policy in the UK.

Similarly, is it fair the unvaccinated can sit in hospital and GP waiting rooms putting potentially vulnerable patients at risk from disease?

Ultimately we do all have free will, and parents still sadly have the right to make idiotic choices on behalf of their children. But equally, the state has the obligation to protect the many, even sometimes at the expense of the few.

I did warn you this one was not for the faint hearted.

Dr David Turner is a GP in north west London

Rate this article  (4.64 average user rating)

Click to rate

  • 1 star out of 5
  • 2 stars out of 5
  • 3 stars out of 5
  • 4 stars out of 5
  • 5 stars out of 5

0 out of 5 stars

Readers' comments (8)

  • Dont forget the role of the Daily Mail in this saga.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Agreed, one of the VERY few occasions where I would advocate state intervention. Unfortunately, of course, as a result of subsidizing parenthood/promoting poor parenting skills

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • before going for - or waiting for -state action , just speculating on possibility of mobilising parent power-eg if all childrens activities organisers /private nurseries/primary schools/sports clubs/Brownies etc were pushed by vaccinating-parents demand into providing vaccinated-only activities/classrooms for their
    children to protect those who didn't respond, vaccine -declining parents( ?the pc name for these)retain the choice-and may still think its a fair exchange for the added difficuties of helping to run the 'non-vaccinated under- 8s' football team or r very tiny '1st non-vaccinated beaverscout pack',and those with woollier or personal organisation reasons for not getting the vaccine would be much more likely to get it done.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Yes state action- no vaccine no school, no benefits, nothing. Dead children means we need to be tough.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Easy. Link it to child benefit. Have the vaccine, get the benefit. Refuse the vaccine (so parental choice allowed, no benefit.

    Problem solved.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • @epicureedward
    OK- see your point- but some of the biggest idiots out there won't be affected by losing child benefit and their children don't go to state school. How do we sort them too to make it fair?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Simple. No vaccination, no taxpayer funded education. GPs can have a go at this but the politicians could sort it out pretty easily.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I agree!
    No Vaccination-No State Support/Education
    Herd Immunity matters!
    Poor Parenting in this case Can Be Managed!
    Politicians should "Man Up"!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say