This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Sometimes only a patient complaint will work

Dr David Turner

Dr david turner duo 3x2

‘Threaten to make a complaint.’

I never thought I would ever utter these words to a patient, but I’m afraid it’s sometimes the only way to get hospitals to stand to attention and take notice.

I’m sure you have all experienced the situation weekly if not daily: a patient who has been an inpatient, or attended an outpatient clinic appointment, had a scan or other investigation in hospital and been told they will be followed up in clinic – but (surprise, surprise) no appointment is forthcoming.

The patient’s next response is to book an appointment with us, with the request we chase it up for them.

The health service should not work only when shouted at and threatened

My reply to these requests is often along the lines: ‘Well we can ask our admin team to phone up for you, but to be honest the hospitals are more likely to respond to patients than GPs.

‘My advice is to phone up the consultant’s secretary daily and if possible go in person to see them; a physical presence is harder to ignore than a phone call or email. If that fails, say you are going to make a complaint – that usually kicks them into action.’

It should not be like this. The health service should not work only when shouted at and threatened.

Yes, hospitals are over stretched and underfunded, but so are we – and in all but rare exceptions we make follow-up appointments for our patients to discuss tests we have organised.

Many hospitals are trying to do follow-up on a shoestring with nurse-led virtual phone clinics, which are cheap fob-offs. If a consultant has ordered an investigation, that consultant, or a doctor in their team, needs to sit down face-to-face with that patient and discuss the results and follow-up plan.

This is a fundamental part of medicine, which cannot and must not be cut out just to save money.

It is not only rude and inappropriate to dump follow-up of hospital investigations on the GP, it also contravenes safe medical practice.

So while there is very little chance of hospital practice improving in this regard, we should fight back and perhaps like toilet training dogs in less sensitive times, ‘rub their noses in their own mess’.

It might be crude but certainly keeps your carpets cleaner.

Dr David Turner is a GP in north-west London

 

Rate this article  (5 average user rating)

Click to rate

  • 1 star out of 5
  • 2 stars out of 5
  • 3 stars out of 5
  • 4 stars out of 5
  • 5 stars out of 5

0 out of 5 stars

Readers' comments (4)

  • "If a consultant has ordered an investigation, that consultant, or a doctor in their team, needs to sit down face-to-face with that patient and discuss the results and follow-up plan."

    I can't really agree with this. If I arranged a face-to-face discussion of results for every test I ordered, my surgeries would be fully booked well into 2019.

    Sometimes I text patients, sometimes I write to them, sometimes I phone them, sometimes I ask reception to pass on messages... and it seems a bit unfair not to allow the same leeway to our secondary care colleagues.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • @Dylan
    You're right, but I think the point David is making is that we are not their house officers and they should really tidy up after themselves. Patient safety being the cardinal issue here.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Bornjovial

    Agree with Dylan,
    There are not enough doctors to sit and explain every test face to face. Although it is not our fault that the situation is that way, we have to make the best of the available resources and arrange for follow up via any appropriate medium - including Nurse clinics, Phone calls from junior doctors, SMS to inform scan/test was normal etc etc.
    What is NOT acceptable is allowing patient to be on tenterhooks about a result with no follow up booked in as it seems to be often the case at present

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • doctordog.

    It is still the clinician who ordered the test that is responsible for its follow up.
    We have had a number of SEAs due to secondary care’s failure to do this.
    Worse still, we are often blamed.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say