This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

pul jul aug2020 cover 80x101px
Read the latest issue online

Independents' Day

New GPs face a baptism of fire - we must think differently

Dr Des Spence

I remember when we had phone boxes that took 2p pieces, fruit that only came in cans (we generally discarded the fruit and drank the syrup), margarine, lolly sticks stuck in bike spokes, home taping, smoking on buses, football casuals, random street violence, two-bar fires, Betamax tape video recorders, the overnight bus to London, launderettes and I especially remember hating boring Sundays. I should also remember that no one actually cares about any of this. People care about the now.

I also remember being a GP trainee.

I got vomited out of medical school and then eventually spewed out of my GP trainee years. Was I prepared for full-time general practice and out-of-hours work? I was experienced by modern standards, but 100% I was not. I made errors, there was little support and it was very isolating. When I think about it even now, I can touch the stress. It took me a further five years after training to become a competent GP. There wasn’t an option, just put up and shut up.

Modern training actually hasn’t changed much. Trainees spill out of training ill-prepared for the swirling throttling chaos that is the current working life of a GP. And this chaos is fuelling the current recruitment problems in general practice. Post training there is no structure, no career path and the available opportunities just seem isolating and limiting to many GPs. Who wants to be in small practice where you never see anyone (especially anyone your own age). Where the admin staff are too afraid to knock on your door and feel unable to call you by your first name. Where you have to dress like your grandma.

The height of your postgraduate training is some drug rep's curling sandwiches or a droning monologue from a consultant spouting unrealistic, impractical and irreverent dogma about conditions he knows nothing about in a primary care setting. Many newly trained GPs think this simply isn’t what they signed up for at the age of 18.

So here’s an idea. Lots of the universities offer GP academic fellowships and these positions are oversubscribed (even if the feedback is decidedly mixed). There clearly is a real appetite for more support and continuing education after GP training. Why not offer something similar targeted at GPs who have just completed their training?

We have coined the fantastically unimaginative job title for this position of a ‘GP internship’. Our practice is offering these GPs seven clinical sessions and two educational sessions a week. Pay is better than that offered by universities. We are offering a £5K educational budget, paid indemnity and attendance at the RCGP conference.

The intention is that the time and money is used by new GPs to pursue relevant Diplomas (or even complete research projects or clinical improvement initiatives). All this within the protection of a large training practice environment. They will be free of the relentless fake reflection and the hoop jumping of their training years. They might actually have an opportunity to learn some practical skills!

Now this is just one idea. What is certain is we need some new thinking and ideas about what is on offer to trainees when they finish for partnership: simply offering salaried or locuming options isn’t working. This is the here and now, and now is the time for action.

If not we might in the future reflect that we remember something called general practice.

Dr Des Spence is a GP in Maryhill, Glasgow

Related images

  • dr des spence duo 3x2

Rate this article  (4.42 average user rating)

Click to rate

  • 1 star out of 5
  • 2 stars out of 5
  • 3 stars out of 5
  • 4 stars out of 5
  • 5 stars out of 5

0 out of 5 stars

Readers' comments (6)

  • Also it would be great if existing GPs could get some further training mid-career. I see hospital consultants being encouraged to develop new skills and procedures and allowed protected time but for us this is out of the question or simply personally unaffordable.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I agree and have been loosely involved in designing something like this recently.

    What Des was really trying to say is what I've thought for a while. Newly qualified GP's don't want to work in small practices (

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Sorry - submission error

    What Des was really trying to say is what I've thought for a while. Newly qualified GP's don't want to work in small practices (less than 8,000) as the peer support just isn't there and tbh it can be a bit lonely.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Lovely to see positive thinking from an old soldier. Unfortunately it's still wishful thinking.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Vinci Ho

    I said something similar on a previous comment on the MRCGP exam:
    Funding more education programmes to help new MRCGPs for further development in general practice is more essential. Learning never stops after completing an examination.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • In Denmark surprise surprise they do it better. new gps just out of training have a centrally subsidised development programme with frequent meetings with peers. Now why didn't we think of that!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say