This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

pul jul aug2020 cover 80x101px
Read the latest issue online

Independents' Day

The Scottish contract doesn’t work for millennial GPs

Dr Punam Krishan

punam krishan 3 x 2

This year we in Scotland welcomed a new GP contract. At the time of negotiations, I was a partner and – from my perspective – the new contract seemed fair. Abolishing QOF and introducing collaborative multidisciplinary working across practices within designated postcode boundaries seemed like a step forward.

A designated GP practice quality lead would meet with their ‘cluster’ of practices on a monthly basis to discuss barriers to quality care delivery in the hope of unifying health messages across the board. The cost for premises would soon be abolished and, for the first time, GPs would be given the recognition of being expert medical generalists.

All these changes were made to empower existing GPs, by helping to lessen the burdensome workload and by enticing new doctors to become GP partners.

Fast forward a few months, I’m now a sessional GP and I view the contract differently. I am, of course, an expert medical generalist and I want to know what’s happening with the new contract developments that influence the care that I deliver to my patients. I want to know what system changes are happening because, for example, although QOF was onerous, it was familiar. However, there are now whispers at the top that are not reaching everyone on the ground.

I'm now viewed as a petulant truant who will soon return to partnership

I recently asked an important person why the new contract didn’t feature the role of the sessional GP. I was amused at the response: ‘You’ll find out when you decide to become a partner.’

Well, you see, I was a partner and I recently resigned because, for me, the pressure and pace of both managing and running the practice was too much. I needed to regain control. I wanted to find balance again, to enjoy the work. To have time to pursue specialist interests that had been suppressed for too long due to mounting pressures of never ending practice related work.

For these reasons I do not want to return to running a business anytime soon, but that doesn’t make me any less of an expert medical generalist. Yet, even though I have more experience than a number of my partner peers, I’m now viewed as a petulant truant who will soon return to partnership.

Portfolio sessional working has become a way of life in the modern age. As well as being young GPs, we want to travel having spent years studying in the one place. We want to explore our options because we are raised on options. It is common to rent a home before buying one. Same goes for dating before settling down. Why then would we want to qualify and become partners in a practice, fixed in one base, for the rest of our life?

Premises or no premises cost, leadership entitlements or additional allied professional support, none of this holds appeal to the millennial doctors to whom I speak. Who would want to take on partnerships where the daily business tasks detract from the reason we went into healthcare in the first place?

The reality is that partnerships are a lot more complex and politically charged than the new contract addresses. Partnership, frankly, was a stress best avoided in my own case. Let’s not forget the financial implications of partnership which can be a nightmare to break free from. The contract offers no help on this.

Sessional GPs have varying roles, some permanently based within a practice, some permanently working between practices within a designated cluster and others providing services wider still. These GPs have far more knowledge and experience of systems that work and systems that really ought to be shut down.

The contract is disappointing because it fails to acknowledge one of the fastest growing career choice – the portfolio sessional GP. These are GPs with medical generalist expertise gained travelling to various practices providing support, cover and care across the country. To not feature their contributions, to not give them a seat at cluster level negotiations and to not acknowledge them as an equal expert is a stark flaw in the new Scottish contract and must be rectified.

Dr Punam Krishan is a sessional GP in Glasgow


Related images

  • punam krishan 3 x 2

Rate this article  (3.74 average user rating)

Click to rate

  • 1 star out of 5
  • 2 stars out of 5
  • 3 stars out of 5
  • 4 stars out of 5
  • 5 stars out of 5

0 out of 5 stars

Readers' comments (16)

  • I enjoyed this article - thanks.

    I also enjoyed the comments, just disappointed one of the more critical comments didn't start with "In my day....

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Make partnership attractive again and they'll come. The system doesn't care about the well being of the practitioners in it..... so needless to say it''ll get the same back from the practitioners. The job was good 20 years ago... its not now.... GPs are being crushed under the failing NHS, expected to pick up the pieces for nowt, whilst the specialists make a fortune in their private clinics..... we can all see the benefits for the NHS/patients in partnership.... we just can't see the benefits for the doctor..... we're not mother Theresa and we have bills to pay.......

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I agree that current contracts are nonsense. Been a partner, felt the wind blowing towards burnout and bankruptcy. Quit.
    If you are a partner and enjoying it, good on you. Hostile environment and falling take home pushed me out.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • 'The scottish contract doesn't work for millenial GPs'
    How do we possibly know that yet?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Good article.
    You millennials have more in common with older ex partners than you think.
    (Was a senior partner, got no support at all in a recruitment crisis and am now proving my services at market rate. I still provide continuity and good medicine... but I won’t sacrifice my life for a failing and perverse system)

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Partnerships, what is left of them are supporting a failing system, just look at what NHS boards are paying in locum fees for directly managed practices! If we all resigned and handed our contracts back, we would be able to achieve a proper market rate for our services, rather than accepting dwindling practice profits and jumping through any arbitrary hoops devised to make our lot joyless. Partnerships will soon be dead (hopefully)

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page

Have your say