This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Perhaps the GMC should perform a self-examination?

Copperfield

copperfield duo 1500x1000px

I love doing the irony, so here goes, even if it is a bit late. The GMC is spending lots of our hards-earned subs on private screening for its employees, courtesy of BMI healthcare.

I’ve just scanned, like many private screening medicals do, what’s on offer. And I’m particularly thrilled to note it includes ‘Breast cancer awareness’ and ‘testicular cancer awareness’.

For the avoidance of doubt, going by the words of BMI’s own health pages, the former means: ‘We recommend that you check your breasts a few days after your period… and get in the habit of looking and feeling for any change regularly.’

And for the latter: ‘Get into the habit of checking your testicles on a regular basis.’

I'm sure Duties of a Doctor says something about practising in an evidence-based way

Well, GMC/BMI healthcare, have I got a learning need for you.

Regular testicular self-examination is an entirely non evidence-based activity which is not recommended by authoritative screening bodies. And regular breast self-examination was discredited years ago on the basis that, not only is it ineffective, it actually causes harm through increasing anxiety and unnecessary biopsies.

Life’s too short to plough through GMC’s Duties of a Doctor, especially when I’ve got patients to not manslaughter, but I’m sure it says something about practising in an evidence-based way. So the GMC is, via its employer perk, encouraging medical activity which contravenes its own guidance. And I think this means I could report the GMC to the GMC.

Or, at the very least, make it aware that it has made a total tit/testicle of itself.

Dr Tony Copperfield is a GP in Essex 

 

Rate this article  (4.8100000000000005 average user rating)

Click to rate

  • 1 star out of 5
  • 2 stars out of 5
  • 3 stars out of 5
  • 4 stars out of 5
  • 5 stars out of 5

0 out of 5 stars

Readers' comments (6)

  • Superb!
    Of course the GMC should be reported to the Professional Standards Authority - as the regulators' regulator. And (very seriously) why not? We would be strung up by our nethers for such misdemeanours - after an agonising and life-changing wait, of course.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Essentially the GMC is saying- look I know doctors surgeries are a bit threadbare and some of the patients smell a bit but if you work for us you can see the nice doctor in a suit in the fancy hospital with a coffee machine. And we don’t mind shafting the doctors working in those surgeries they’re just scum who don’t know what they’re doing - they massively overrefer/underefer* (*delete as appropriate according to the latest views of the daily fail/patient advocacy group)

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • VERY GOOD

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The GMC loves self-examination; they visually inspect their own sigmoid colon ever so frequently.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Has anyone ever noticed that the GMC's rhetoric has a very similar flavour to Vladimir Putin's. Their statements are always laced with threatening and sinister inferences.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Tony - do you have any objection to me quoting your article to the GMC, as I very prepared to raise a formal complaint to them - fight fire with fire

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say