This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Read the latest issue online

Gold, incentives and meh

Government immigration plans risk unravelling the NHS

Dr Kailash Chand

Dr Kailash Chand

The government’s plan to limit immigration is finally published today. We need to consider urgently the massive implications for the NHS of the proposal to implement a £30,000 salary threshold for entry to the UK.

Remember many nurses, junior doctors, physiotherapists, dietitians and radiographers earn less than £30,000 a year. Workforce is the biggest problem facing the NHS right now and our current immigration rules are already too restrictive. Nurses and GPs are the two most obvious areas for concern.

Approximately one quarter of the NHS workforce is non-British. The proportion rises to a third if we focus on doctors, including locums. And, according to figures from NHS Professionals, non-British staff also account for a significant proportion of agency staff working in the NHS – over a third of nursing shifts covered by agency staff over the past few years were worked by foreign staff on temporary visas.

The NHS survives because of them: make it harder for them to stay or more unpleasant to work here so they choose to leave and the NHS will unravel. The Government’s own impact analysis shows the policy will cut the number of healthcare professionals coming here from the EU by more than a quarter.

Existing immigration policies in the UK are completely out of sync with the demands of the NHS

We are witnessing a huge recruitment crisis in general practice in particular. Nearly every GP surgery is missing a doctor, set against an increasing GP workload due to changing health needs and policies designed to develop more primary and community-based health care. According to the BMA we need at least 10,000 GPs to meet ever increasing demand.

The health secretary’s pledge of £3.5bn extra to build up more services in the community, announced last month, is welcome. But it does not create one extra GP or nurse. Even if there is money for this plan, where are the staff to deliver it?

The existing immigration policies in the UK are completely out of sync with the demands of the NHS, especially when general practice does not even figure in the Home Office’s list of categories that are facing a workforce shortage. The home secretary needs to push for GPs to be on the migration advisory committee’s shortage occupation list, in order to make it easier to recruit from abroad.

Confirmation that the Tier 2 visa cap for skilled workers will be lifted is welcome, but GP services are still disadvantaged by the visa system because surgeries have to pay about £2,000 to sponsor a non-EEA doctor they wish to recruit. This fee needs abolishing.

Recruitment and retention in the NHS is a huge issue: with more than one in 10 clinical posts now vacant and everything from Brexit to burnout pushing the numbers in the wrong direction, the NHS desperately needs a long-term workforce strategy.

The government must vocally acknowledge the benefits to the NHS from immigration. Relaxing migration policy for the NHS would be one step in the right direction.

Dr Kailash Chand is a retired GP in Tameside


Rate this article  (3.5 average user rating)

Click to rate

  • 1 star out of 5
  • 2 stars out of 5
  • 3 stars out of 5
  • 4 stars out of 5
  • 5 stars out of 5

0 out of 5 stars

Readers' comments (6)

  • AlanAlmond

    How many GPs earn less than £30,000? You cite GP shortages as a central theme in your argument but this part of it is pretty irrelevant. I don’t take issue with the general thrust of what your saying but you confuse the issue by bringing this in. It’s no wonder we are routinely shafted by the government given the low quality and sloppy reasoning of so many of those who have a history of ‘leadership roles’. Drs are supposed to be clever, it ain’t alway so. So many of those so expert at climbing the greasy pole of influence lack basic facilities in reasoned argument. Apologies but it’s a recurrent theme in much of your output.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Agree. Your argument is ‘pretty irrelevant’. There are so many factors pushing primary care over the edge. The main one being lack of leadership from BMA, RCGP, et al and those agencies persistent waffling.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • In any case, why would you want to bring doctors here to face a DR Bawa Garba reality ?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Foreign-born GPs are bearing the brunt of public hostility in the climate of austerity [ Pulse]

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Kailash clearly still lives in the dream of comprehensive socialised medicine being good for everyone. And he is clearly a patriot in that rather than training our own staff, he'd rather import unknown numbers of foreigners, brain-draining their own home nations, with occasionally questionable qualifications, and driving down wages of workers here. Comprehensive socialised medicine is a bad idea, and we see the results of it all around us. Time to wake up people.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • You clearly didn’t thought this through, even if an IMG gets a visa the hostility remains , the reason so many of trained img GPs have left Uk . There were times when surplus doctors were aviailable in thousands about 15 years ago so what’s the point of repeating the same . The most important issue here is retention , to be honest don’t enter to work for long , this the spirit now .

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say