This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

pul jul aug2020 cover 80x101px
Read the latest issue online

Independents' Day

I voted Brexit for the NHS – now show us the money

Dr Kailash Chand

Let me confess. I voted for Brexit, on a single issue – the promise of £350 million a week for the NHS made by Brexiteers led by Boris Johnson. The now foreign secretary stated in an article for the Daily Telegraph: ‘Once we have settled our accounts, we will take back control of roughly £350m per week. It would be a fine thing, as many of us have pointed out, if a lot of that money went on the NHS.’

NHS England chief Simon Stevens has now articulated the views of many like me, using an image of the notorious Vote Leave battle bus, saying: ‘The NHS wasn’t on the ballot paper but it was on the Battle Bus. Vote Leave for a better funded health service – £350m a week.

‘Rather than criticising these clear Brexit funding commitments to NHS patients – promises entered into by cabinet ministers and by MPs – the public wants to see them honoured.’

Historically, the service has enjoyed rises of around 4% to cover the cost of the ageing population and new drugs. There is a £30bn gap to fill and we should be increasing the UK’s health spending by at least £10.3bn to match that of other leading European economies.

The health and social care system is a mess. Net expenditure on social care has dropped in real terms from £8.1bn in 2005/06 to £6.3bn in 2014/15, a drop of more than 20%. The Department of Health’s budget will increase by just over £4 billion in real terms between 2015/16 and 2020/21. This is not enough to maintain standards of NHS care, meet rising demand from patients and deliver the transformation in services outlined in Simon Steven’s Five Year Forward View. The pressures on the NHS will peak in 2018/19 and 2019/20, when there is almost no planned growth in real-terms funding.

If Simon Steven’s request is not heeded by the Chancellor, the intense pressures on the NHS and social care services will continue to grow. Already, two-thirds of NHS trusts (65%) and NHS foundation trusts (66%) reported deficits in 2015/16, up from 44% of NHS trusts and 51% of NHS foundation trusts in the previous financial year. The number of CCGs reporting cumulative deficits was 32 in 2015/16, up from 19 in both 2014/15 and 2013/14.

This massive funding shortfall means hospital authorities have no choice but cutting bed numbers and already a third of A&Es are set to close to cope with rising hospital deficits. Vulnerable elderly and disabled people will pay the price for a lack of new investment in social care, according to the Nuffield Trust. The government is asking GP practices to provide more services, including many involving the transfer of hospital care into the community, without the resources required to successfully deliver them. Primary care is imploding faster than people realise and patients are already bearing the brunt of the problem.

A combined financial and staffing crisis could cause ongoing chaos for years and ultimately kill off the NHS for good. It’s impossible to see how the NHS will get through the year 2018/19, when spending per person will fall. Something will have to give, whether it’s ballooning waiting lists, record deficits, or having to refuse patients new drugs.

I echo the statement of BMA chair, Dr Chaand Nagpaul: ‘The promise of extra funding for the NHS was a key issue at the ballot box during the Brexit referendum, and people rightly expect that promise to be honoured.’

‘With the budget only weeks away, bold action to deliver on this pledge, as proposed by Simon Stevens, is urgently needed and has the backing of the BMA. This is vital in order to address the current crisis in our health service, protect and improve patient care and put the NHS on a sustainable footing for the future.’

We have been squeezing the lemon for ‘efficiency savings’ for years. But it is getting to the stage where there is nothing left to squeeze.

Dr Kailash Chand is a retired GP from Tameside and is honorary vice-president of the BMA

 

Rate this article  (2.2800000000000002 average user rating)

Click to rate

  • 1 star out of 5
  • 2 stars out of 5
  • 3 stars out of 5
  • 4 stars out of 5
  • 5 stars out of 5

0 out of 5 stars

Readers' comments (25)

  • at 9.02, mark your typo of £350 per week is probably spot on

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • David Banner

    Re Albert 9/11/17

    The criticism of the author of this article is that he voted Brexit for the NHS, NOT that he voted Brexit. I am no fan of the undemocratic and dictatorial EU, and the issue is FAR from the black & white polarised "in or out" that it has sadly become. There were plenty of reasons to vote Brexit, but to do so to protect the NHS was naive at best.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Slogan on bus:
    "We send the EU £350 million a week
    Let's fund our NHS instead"
    At no time did I (or anyone I know) interpret that as a 'Brexit funding commitment' that an extra £350 million a week might be spent on the NHS, but that increased funding of the NHS would be more easily afforded.
    Even if it had been a commitment, the time to 'make good' on it would only be once the UK stops paying for EU membership.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Bob Hodges

    Democracy - 60% of of the population, who are largely uninformed, vote in what they perceive to be their self-interest by choosing between a range of equally uniformed candidates who are utterly unqualifed for the job.

    What's so great about that?

    We need a technocracy.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • AlanAlmond

    “Let’s ditch democracy”
    The clarion call of the remoaners.
    QED

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page50 results per page

Have your say