This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Read the latest issue online

GPs buried under trusts' workload dump

Just because you’re paranoid…

Editor’s blog

We have had two stories over the past week that have made me think that the paranoia around commissioners wanting small practices to close might actually have something in it.

In the first story, a practice had to close after the death of a single-hander. There was someone who was ready to take over immediately. However, commissioners failed to get the paperwork signed by the single-hander before he sadly passed away. So now the practice is closing.

In the second story, the LMC is claiming that the local CCG is not stumping up the funding needed to save a ‘vital’ small rural surgery. They say that the procurement process to take over the practice is not enough, and is being rushed – with the aim of the practice having to close.

These CCGs’ actions have suggested that, yes, small practices might be paranoid, but it doesn’t mean they are not out to get them

In both these instances, it wouldn’t take much to save these practices. Yet, in both cases, the CCGs are not willing to take this action.

When Pulse last year revealed Dr Arvind Madan, the former NHS England director of primary care, said GPs should be ‘pleased’ when small practices closed, it could at least be rationalised as pushing for them to work in networks.

Yet these CCGs’ actions have suggested that if GPs in small practices thought they were being paranoid, it doesn’t mean someone's not out to get them.

Jaimie Kaffash is editor of Pulse. Follow him on Twitter @jkaffash or email him at editor@pulsetoday.co.uk

Rate this article  (5 average user rating)

Click to rate

  • 1 star out of 5
  • 2 stars out of 5
  • 3 stars out of 5
  • 4 stars out of 5
  • 5 stars out of 5

0 out of 5 stars

Readers' comments (2)

  • Vinci Ho

    Remember section 75 of the Health and Social Care Act and the story behind how it was established?
    CCGs simply have become the subordinates of NHSE aka Ministry of Plenty (Newspeak: Miniplenty) . Without Madangate , one could still argue about giving the benefit of doubt to these bureaucrats and technocrats for the ideology of clinical commissioning run by GPs . What is the reality revealed by history?
    ‘’Useless laws weaken the necessary laws.”
    Montesquieu

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Peter Swinyard

    Yes. Paranoia is not sectionable here. The Family Doctor Association is happy to use its national influence to help preserve smaller practices for the benefit of its members. All practices in good standing with the FDA will get all our support to the best outcome - we are happy to engage with the bureaucrats on their behalf and provide vital support.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say