This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Go back to basics for revalidation feedback

Dr Hank Beerstecher, a GP in Sittingbourne, Kent discusses the pitfalls of digital questionnaires

Multi-source feedback (MSF) is an obligatory part of revalidation. It consists of patient and peer feedback using approved questionnaires. GMC guidance says this feedback should be evaluated by an outside organisation rather than by doctors themselves.

Paper-based questionnaires are accepted for patients, but most providers only offer an online option for colleague feedback.

I am a single-handed GP in Kent and used two providers for colleague feedback, one email-based and the other paper-based. My local area team had requested a minimum of 15 peer responses. I provided the email MSF provider with the email adresses of the practice staff and the secretaries of consultants and practitioners I had referred patients to in the past year.

The email feedback resulted in six responses - four from my own practice staff and one locum, and just two responses and one refusal from approximately 40 hospital colleagues.

My concern grew as the appraisal date drew closer, with my appraiser warning me that no MSF meant no revalidation.

So I found a company that would process a paper-based colleague MSF. We sent out a similar number of questionnaires (43) and received 33 responses. I included the local care homes as their healthcare assistants probably have a better view of patient consultations than anyone else.

In my experience of approaching a more or less random sample of recent peers instead of asking acquaintances, the paper version brings a markedly higher response - 77% - compared with 5% from an email-based service.

Readers' comments (4)

  • I absolutely agree with you. Especially is rural areas, e mail culture is very poor.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • basics always best

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I had similar experience but email response from colleagues was fine,patient's questionnaire response was slow.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Well, well, well come back Harold Shipman.
    You got us into this mess so you can now be lead revalidator, as you would probably have been all along.
    In my bag, I have some diamorph which you may borrow.

    I find that, in general, appraisers are pompous , athough not all. My current one is great.

    What really irks for a GP with nearly 35 years experience is that some appraisers do not even look toilet trained.

    The best revalidator is the number of complaints.

    I love the job and would love to go on beyond my current 65 but this will become increasingly difficult.

    Will I be lost? Not exactly because I can always venture down to Newmarket to see racing the offspring of my double world champion mare, Soviet Song.

    By the way, Sovie, were you revalidated?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say