This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

pul jul aug2020 cover 80x101px
Read the latest issue online

Independents' Day

Letter of the month: The CQC is too much work for us, especially now

Dr Fiona Cornish admits, it might be time for GPs to boycott the scheme

Dr Copperfield warned us about the Care Quality Commission (CQC) with words of wisdom back in August 2012. His prophesy has now become reality and is hitting us in the face; in fact it is getting so far up my nasal passages, it has practically hit cerebrospinal fluid.

Documenting policies and procedures in the name of patient safety has become bread and butter work to GPs, and it is more exhausting not to conform than to tick the boxes and move on. Like the European Working Time Directive it is probably open to interpretation, but most PCTs seem to be going for the hook line and sinker approach anyway.

The time and expense of the regulations, just when we are trying to save millions for the NHS, and coping with the massive reorganisation, seem to hit a raw nerve. We’re already busy preparing for revalidation, and the new contract has us doing back-of-a-napkin calculations to see whether we’d be better off giving up our surgery to become salaried doctors. We don’t need another headache on top of those.

It might be that we’ve lost our sense of humour, but some of the diktats which have reached my surgery are beyond a joke.

For example we can’t have toys in the waiting room or consulting room unless they can be wiped. Books are also thought to be dangerous. I wonder how many children have developed septicaemia from touching my treasured plastic crocodile. I have insisted on keeping my toy basket, which provides an essential part of a decent consultation with children. Besides, which member of staff should be deployed to wipe said toys?

Another PCT principle demands that every member of staff in our practice, including receptionists, receive a list of online learning requirements. At the last count this was 23 hours of modules on topics as exciting as ‘Handling of NHS Records’ and the only way to achieve this is for staff to have allocated time during the working day. It doesn’t take a lot of mental maths to work out that this is a lot of time. The GPs, of course, are invited to indulge in this leisure activity when not at work, making for several thrilling Saturday afternoons.  And, oh yes – this has to be done every year, just in case we might forget which colour of bin in which to hurl the rarest type of hazardous waste. I can’t count the hours I’ve spent reading about manual handling, fire safety, infection control, and equality and diversity, followed by assessments in which (for example) you have to know that it is acceptable to describe a patient as an ‘older’ person, but unacceptable to call them old.The certificates can only be printed when you have passed and, if your mind wanders at any stage during the assessment and you ‘fail’ it, you have to take it all over again.

I would love to know who dreamt up such rules as, not allowing perfumed liquid soap in soap dispensers. We happened to have invested in a large batch of mildly aromatic blue liquid soap, which was duly threatened with a one-way ticket to the bin (I wonder which colour bin?). When I enquired about the threat to Health and Safety from this mildly-scented soap, there seemed to be no answer.

Unfortunately, being bemused and baffled by the logic of some of the regulations does not solve my problems. Sometimes I can’t help wondering why we have agreed to them. Boris Johnson’s description of members of the London Assembly as ‘great, supine, protoplasmic, invertebrate jellies’ might equally apply to doctors in their response to CQC and the creeping, dictator-like imposition of daft PCT rules and regulations.

Perhaps Dr Copperfield’s suggestion that we boycott the CQC would galvanise the whole profession into action. We ought to stick up for ourselves and for what really matters, which is looking after the patients.

Dr Fiona Cornish is a GP in Cambridge and chair of the Medical Women’s Federation.

Readers' comments (5)

  • It was clearly obvious that if the BMA had any spine it would have done the following when being threatened with an imposed contract.

    1. Not co-operate with CQC

    2. Not take part in CCG's

    Nobody would have been harmed and we would have at least got some free time to see patients. Instead they DID NOTHING.

    I have taken the best route. I start early retirement on Friday :))))))

    Time to hand the baton on.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The CQC have already said over and again they don't really care about infection control issues with carpets and toys, so why get stressed about it?

    If you read the pilot inspections, they are taking a really soft touch approach with GPs; they've given extra time for the 500 GP practices who "forgot" to register; the fees are cheaper than any other profession; and more.

    Chillax and be grateful you didn't train to be a dentist!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I have backed out too - occasional locums for me only now... and I just hope that there are still some sane and sentient doctors out there when I need them in my dotage. and, as a doctor said recently - the things happening to medicine are, frankly, Stalinist. I need say no more.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Yes I've just taken my 24hr retirement, but (perhaps foolishly) have decided to continue part-time, for now at least. Having 1 foot out of the door feels better already even after 1 week, but perhaps doing locums would feel even better. CCGs, the new contract and CQC are a sinister threat to traditional general practice. So despite the privilege of getting to know my patient population over the last 30 years this vestige of traditional general practice may have to be sacrificed to maintain my health & sanity. What a shame for our patients .

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • >Chillax and be grateful you didn't train to be a dentist!

    Yes, because dentists are doing so badly at the moment.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say