This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Read the latest issue online

Gold, incentives and meh

Physician associates should be subject to mandatory regulation

Dr Zishan Syed has started a petition campaigning for physician associates to be subject to mandatory regulation

From Dr Zishan Syed, GP Partner, Maidstone, Kent

General practice as a speciality may soon become extinct and GPs are letting it happen right under their noses. The latest sticking plaster solution touted by Mr Hunt is that of physician associates.

Physician associates have not sat the applied knowledge test nor the clinical skills assessment - both essential (and expensive) components of the MRCGP exam, which GP trainees have to pass to qualify. It is an unacceptable threat to patient safety to allow other professionals to work in GP-like roles without being assessed in this way.

Furthermore there is no equivalent regulatory body, such as the GMC, to oversee physician associates. In the absence of a body with the same strict attitude towards regulation that the GMC has towards doctors (who are highly trained and competent professionals) I feel it is unacceptable for reasons of patient safety to have physician associates operating in the high-risk environment of general practice. This is especially the case when they have not gone through the same rigorous training as GPs.

Why should there be a two-tier system of working in general practice? With additional training for doctors to practise in a GP surgery but physician associates actively seeing patients after a two-year course.

And when things go wrong, as they often do in a high-pressured environment, it is the doctor who will take culpability.

As a clinician, I argue it is unacceptable for society to promote a system where one professional sees a patient and blame is divested onto a doctor when things go wrong.

If society is to promote physician associates then it must promote a fair system of law where such individuals take full responsibility for the patients they see rather than scapegoating GPs. In the present environment it is ridiculous to claim, as some clinicians do, that they are able to supervise physician associates while simultaneously seeing patients with complex problems in the outdated 10-minute appointment system.

Somehow in primary care we have got used to dangerous sticking plaster solutions such as these. Fundamentally, we need to make working conditions better for GPs and GP trainees rather than doing our utmost to make working conditions better for other professionals who want to work in general practice without taking the full medico-legal responsibility that it entails.

Physician associates will pose a threat to the future jobs of qualified doctors as the government will inevitably employ them for reasons of cost rather than quality.

At present the regulation of physician associates is done through a voluntary register. This register does not have the force of the law, meaning that physician associates can see patients even if they are not registered. This poses an unacceptable risk to patient safety in GP surgeries.

I have therefore set up a petition to call for a proper mandatory registration process for physician associates and I encourage all who are interested in patient safety to sign it.

Rate this article  (4.33 average user rating)

Click to rate

  • 1 star out of 5
  • 2 stars out of 5
  • 3 stars out of 5
  • 4 stars out of 5
  • 5 stars out of 5

0 out of 5 stars

Readers' comments (25)

  • These people cant be protected by us they need to stand on their own two feet.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Here here. I would not employ a physicians associate as a GP partner. They are being lined up to run ooh, walk in centers and private company run GP surgeries. The outcome will be more referrals or see your own GP this evening. Already done by nurse practitioners in ooh setting, a+e and will just get worse. Access in only name, not in quality.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Physician associates as a profession has been demanding statutory regulation for the last ten years. We will continue to do so.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I totally agree with you.But one have to question the authority of impotent RCGP.To be honest these Gp exams are good money making business for RCGP.
    These exams will go on even if there was no one to opt for GP training.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I am actually one of the UK trained and practising Physician Associates and know I am speaking on behalf of all Physician Associates when I say I strongly agree regarding the necessity of statutory regulation and it is something we as a profession have been continually campaigning and pushing for for years, certainly in the interests of patient safety as well as for ensuring clearly set standards for our profession.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I'm totally gobsmacked to hear that they aren't!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • We have got to a point where there is an unbelievably strict and complex regulatory system for GP's, the strictest in the world. These allied health professionals have nothing. It is ridiculous.

    I have thought for a long time that it is important we don't take on any more risk by accepting any extra responsibility for these workers.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Oh dear, if passing the MRCGP is the only yardstick for the assumption that one can practise safely as a GP, then there are a lot of doctors out there who should not be practising at all!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Please check your facts *It is a 2 year Postgraduate course covering 90-95% of medicine.
    Also do you even have any experience of working with PAs? It sounds like you don't and have a very superficial misconception of the role, the relationship and the legalities.

    ''Physician associates will pose a threat to the future jobs of qualified doctors as the government will inevitably employ them for reasons of cost rather than quality'' - Exceeding negative and judgemental. We are here to provide quality healthcare. Why on earth do you think we would want to be a cheap or poor quality alternative?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

    'Physician associate training lasts two years,'

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 results per page20 results per page50 results per page

Have your say