Cookie policy notice

By continuing to use this site you agree to our cookies policy below:
Since 26 May 2011, the law now states that cookies on websites can ony be used with your specific consent. Cookies allow us to ensure that you enjoy the best browsing experience.

This site is intended for health professionals only

At the heart of general practice since 1960

Placing caps on community surgery will not benefit patients or the NHS

Professor Vijay Kumar argues against limiting the number of vasectomies carried out

From Professor Vijay Kumar, President of the Association of Surgeons in Primary Care (ASPC)

In a world where transformational care and patient-centred care are in vogue, it makes no sense to place limits or bans on the numbers of vasectomies carried out.

I have worked as a community surgeon for 14 years and hold several national and regional roles, including President of the Association of Surgeons in Primary Care, Chairman of Royal College of GPs Yorkshire, and board member for the Association of Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland, but I should stress the views I present here are my own.

We should be very proud to say that surgical procedures have been carried out in the community for many years in Britain. GP surgeons have been paid only a fraction of the money that hospitals charge to carry out vasectomies. I am aware in some parts of the country GPs are paid less than 30% of the cost for a vasectomy in the community compared to those carried out in hospital. We should truly embrace a service that provides local services by local doctors at the local practice, at a convenient time and so on, but the cuts do not fit in with this model. Nor do they fit with vertical integration of seamless care delivery, removing inappropriate services from secondary to primary care.

Several reports including the Five Year Plan by Simon Stevens have recognised that procedures carried out in primary care are very cost effective and are done at fraction of the tariff.

Capping the number of vasectomies will not benefit the patient or the NHS. The cost of carrying out the procedure in secondary care is higher and so is the cost to the patient in terms of travel, parking charges, taking time out of work, as well as suffering long waiting lists. It certainly discriminates against couples where the woman is unable to use other methods of contraception as the cost of an unplanned pregnancy is colossal.

The ASPC (alongside the RCGP and ASGBI) has been at the forefront of providing services in the community that are cost affective, truly patient centred, and improve patient satisfaction as well as supporting community surgeons (both GP surgeons and consultants) who operate in the community.

Given the additional burden in costs and manpower that will be incurred by secondary care as a result of such caps, removing such services would be doing a disservice to the patients, staff working in the community and to the NHS as a whole.

Rate this article  (4.33 average user rating)

Click to rate

  • 1 star out of 5
  • 2 stars out of 5
  • 3 stars out of 5
  • 4 stars out of 5
  • 5 stars out of 5

0 out of 5 stars

Readers' comments (2)

  • yes that is true -- has been tried in so many disguises
    and it still ain't work

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • In our area they are capping them for all providers. So instead we'll spend the money on terminations and mental health services when it goes wrong.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

IMPORTANT: On Wednesday 7 December 2016, we implemented a new log in system, and if you have not updated your details you may experience difficulties logging in. Update your details here. Only GMC-registered doctors are able to comment on this site.